Human-Inspired Control of Dual-Arm Exoskeleton Robots With Force and Impedance Adaptation

Humans can adapt to complex environments by voluntarily adjusting the impedance parameters and interaction force. Traditional robots perform tasks independently without considering their interactions with the external environment, which leads to poor flexibility and adaptability. Comparatively, humans can adapt to complex environments by voluntarily adjusting the impedance parameters and interaction force. In order to solve the problems of human–robot security and adaptability to unknown environment, a human-inspired control with force and impedance adaptation is proposed to interact with unknown environments and exhibit this biological behavior on the developed dual-arm exoskeleton robots. First, we propose a computationally model utilizing the sampled surface electromyogram (sEMG) signals to calculate the human arm endpoint stiffness and define a co-contraction index to describe the dynamic behaviors of the muscular activities in the tasks. Then, the obtained human limb impedance stiffness parameters and the sampling position information are transferred to the slave arm of the exoskeleton as the input variables of the controller in real-time. In addition, a variable stiffness observer is used here to compensate for the errors of the calculated stiffness by sEMG signals. The experimental studies of human impedance transfer control have been conducted to show the effectiveness of the developed approach. Results of the experimental suggest that the proposed controller can achieve human motor adaptation and enable the subjects to execute a skill transfer control by a dual-arm exoskeleton robot.

[1]  Neville Hogan,et al.  Impedance Control: An Approach to Manipulation: Part I—Theory , 1985 .

[2]  Yu Guo,et al.  Adaptive Prescribed Performance Motion Control of Servo Mechanisms with Friction Compensation , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[3]  Jwu-Sheng Hu,et al.  Design of Sensing System and Anticipative Behavior for Human Following of Mobile Robots , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[4]  Guido Herrmann,et al.  Robust adaptive finite-time parameter estimation and control of nonlinear systems , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Symposium on Intelligent Control.

[5]  Chenguang Yang,et al.  Guest Editorial An Overview of Biomedical Robotics and Bio-Mechatronics Systems and Applications , 2016, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Syst..

[6]  H. Gomi,et al.  Task-Dependent Viscoelasticity of Human Multijoint Arm and Its Spatial Characteristics for Interaction with Environments , 1998, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[7]  M. Turvey Action and perception at the level of synergies. , 2007, Human movement science.

[8]  J. Salisbury,et al.  Active stiffness control of a manipulator in cartesian coordinates , 1980, 1980 19th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control including the Symposium on Adaptive Processes.

[9]  Nikolaos G. Tsagarakis,et al.  Exploring Teleimpedance and Tactile Feedback for Intuitive Control of the Pisa/IIT SoftHand , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Haptics.

[10]  Zhijun Li,et al.  Dynamic Balance Optimization and Control of Quadruped Robot Systems With Flexible Joints , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems.

[11]  Xingsong Wang,et al.  Inverse Transmission Model and Compensation Control of a Single-Tendon–Sheath Actuator , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[12]  Giorgio Grioli,et al.  A Non-invasive Real-Time Method for Measuring Variable Stiffness , 2010, Robotics: Science and Systems.

[13]  Ya-Jun Pan,et al.  A novel adaptive robust control architecture for bilateral teleoperation systems under time‐varying delays , 2015 .

[14]  Shuzhi Sam Ge,et al.  Human–Robot Collaboration Based on Motion Intention Estimation , 2014, IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics.

[15]  Nikolaos G. Tsagarakis,et al.  Tele-impedance: Teleoperation with impedance regulation using a body–machine interface , 2012, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[16]  H. Gomi,et al.  Multijoint muscle regulation mechanisms examined by measured human arm stiffness and EMG signals. , 1999, Journal of neurophysiology.

[17]  Isabel Pedersen,et al.  Exoskeletons, Transhumanism, and Culture: Performing Superhuman Feats , 2017, IEEE Technology and Society Magazine.

[18]  Nikolaos G. Tsagarakis,et al.  A reduced-complexity description of arm endpoint stiffness with applications to teleimpedance control , 2015, 2015 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS).

[19]  Nikolaos G. Tsagarakis,et al.  Tele-impedance based assistive control for a compliant knee exoskeleton , 2015, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[20]  Wei-Der Chang,et al.  A feedforward neural network with function shape autotuning , 1996, Neural Networks.

[21]  Renquan Lu,et al.  Trajectory-Tracking Control of Mobile Robot Systems Incorporating Neural-Dynamic Optimized Model Predictive Approach , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems.

[22]  Rieko Osu,et al.  The central nervous system stabilizes unstable dynamics by learning optimal impedance , 2001, Nature.

[23]  Yong Yang,et al.  Development and Repetitive Learning Control of Lower Limb Exoskeleton Driven by Electrohydraulic Actuators , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[24]  Shuzhi Sam Ge,et al.  Reference Adaptation for Robots in Physical Interactions With Unknown Environments , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics.

[25]  Daisuke Yashiro,et al.  Abstraction of Action Components Unconstrained by Alignment of Haptic Sensing Points , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[26]  Stefano Stramigioli,et al.  Bilateral Telemanipulation With Time Delays: A Two-Layer Approach Combining Passivity and Transparency , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Robotics.

[27]  Inna Sharf,et al.  Contact Stiffness and Damping Estimation for Robotic Systems , 2003, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[28]  Inmin Kao,et al.  Properties of the Grasp Stiffness Matrix and Conservative Control Strategies , 1999, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[29]  Giorgio Grioli,et al.  Variable Stiffness Actuators: Review on Design and Components , 2016, IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics.

[30]  P. Crago,et al.  Multijoint dynamics and postural stability of the human arm , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[31]  Peter J. Beek,et al.  Can co-activation reduce kinematic variability? A simulation study , 2005, Biological Cybernetics.

[32]  Y. Koike,et al.  A myokinetic arm model for estimating joint torque and stiffness from EMG signals during maintained posture. , 2009, Journal of neurophysiology.

[33]  Wenwei Yu,et al.  Variable Impedance Control Based on Impedance Estimation Model with EMG Signals during Extension and Flexion Tasks for a Lower LimbRehabilitation Robotic System , 2013 .

[34]  Alberto Rovetta,et al.  Remote control in telerobotic surgery , 1996, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part A.

[35]  D. J. Bennett Stretch reflex responses in the human elbow joint during a voluntary movement. , 1994, The Journal of physiology.

[36]  Tom Carlson,et al.  Muscular activity and physical interaction forces during lower limb exoskeleton use. , 2016, Healthcare technology letters.

[37]  Jing Na,et al.  RISE-Based Asymptotic Prescribed Performance Tracking Control of Nonlinear Servo Mechanisms , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems.

[38]  S. Ge,et al.  Control of nonlinear systems with time-varying output constraints , 2009, IEEE International Conference on Control and Automation.

[39]  Shuzhi Sam Ge,et al.  Robust adaptive control of uncertain force/motion constrained nonholonomic mobile manipulators , 2008, Autom..

[40]  Mitsuo Kawato,et al.  Internal models for motor control and trajectory planning , 1999, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.