Chapter Four - Assessment and Recognition of Rivals in Anuran Contests

[1]  G. Bourne,et al.  Advertisement Call Variation in the Golden Rocket Frog (Anomaloglossus beebei): Evidence for Individual Distinctiveness , 2013 .

[2]  M. Ryan,et al.  Female preferences for socially variable call characters in the cricket frog, Acris crepitans , 2004, Animal Behaviour.

[3]  E. Hebets,et al.  An introduction to multimodal communication , 2013, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[4]  J. Konieczka,et al.  Agonistic encounters in a cricket frog (Acris crepitans) chorus: Behavioral outcomes vary with local competition and within the breeding season , 1999 .

[5]  C. Boake.  Repeatability: Its role in evolutionary studies of mating behavior , 1989, Evolutionary Ecology.

[6]  Donald E. Kroodsma,et al.  Suggested experimental designs for song playbacks , 1989, Animal Behaviour.

[7]  W. Cade,et al.  Does signalling mitigate the cost of agonistic interactions? A test in a cricket that has lost its song , 2010, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[8]  R. F. Thompson,et al.  Habituation: a model phenomenon for the study of neuronal substrates of behavior. , 1966, Psychological review.

[9]  M. Cummings,et al.  A multifunctional warning signal behaves as an agonistic status signal in a poison frog , 2015 .

[10]  R. Elwood,et al.  Assessment of fighting ability in animal contests , 2009, Animal Behaviour.

[11]  Peter K. McGregor,et al.  Design of Playback Experiments: The Thornbridge Hall NATO ARW Consensus , 1992 .

[12]  Claude E. Shannon,et al.  A mathematical theory of communication , 1948, MOCO.

[13]  William E. Wagner.  Graded aggressive signals in Blanchard's cricket frog: vocal responses to opponent proximity and size , 1989, Animal Behaviour.

[14]  Donald A. Wilson,et al.  Habituation revisited: An updated and revised description of the behavioral characteristics of habituation , 2009, Neurobiology of Learning and Memory.

[15]  B. Seidel.  Water-wave Communication between Territorial Male Bombina variegata , 1999 .

[16]  A. Mason,et al.  Assessment during aggressive contests between male jumping spiders , 2008, Animal Behaviour.

[17]  Anthony Arak,et al.  Sexual selection by male–male competition in natterjack toad choruses , 1983, Nature.

[18]  F. Nottebohm,et al.  Repeated exposure to one song leads to a rapid and persistent decline in an immediate early gene's response to that song in zebra finch telencephalon , 1995, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[19]  G. Johnston,et al.  Vibrational Signaling in the Agonistic Interactions of Red-Eyed Treefrogs , 2010, Current Biology.

[20]  Jack W. Bradbury,et al.  Principles of Animal Communication , 1998 .

[21]  Henrik Brumm,et al.  Animal Communication and Noise , 2013, Animal Signals and Communication.

[22]  J. Bruce Falls,et al.  Individual recognition by song in white-throated sparrows. I. Discrimination of songs of neighbors and strangers , 1975 .

[23]  Aggressive Thresholds of Male Pacific Treefrogs for Advertisement Calls Vary with Amplitude of Neighbors' Calls , 2010 .

[24]  M. Pagel,et al.  Why do animals repeat displays? , 1997, Animal Behaviour.

[25]  K. Wells,et al.  Vocal communication in a neotropical treefrog, Hyla ebraccata: responses of females to advertisement and aggressive calls , 1987 .

[26]  S. C. Humfeld,et al.  Context-dependent plasticity of aggressive signalling in a dynamic social environment , 2009, Animal Behaviour.

[27]  J. Robertson.  Male territoriality, fighting and assessment of fighting ability in the Australian frog Uperoleia rugosa , 1986, Animal Behaviour.

[28]  F. James Rohlf,et al.  Biometry: The Principles and Practice of Statistics in Biological Research , 1969 .

[29]  M. Ryan,et al.  Information transfer during cricket frog contests , 2002, Animal Behaviour.

[30]  Eliot A. Brenowitz,et al.  Plasticity of aggressive thresholds in Hyla regilla discrete accommodation to encounter calls , 1997, Animal Behaviour.

[31]  F. H. Test.  Social aggressiveness in an amphibian. , 1954, Science.

[32]  N. Davies,et al.  Deep croaks and fighting assessment in toads Bufo bufo , 1978, Nature.

[33]  T. Clutton‐Brock,et al.  THE ROARING OF RED DEER AND THE EVOLUTION OF HONEST ADVERTISEMENT , 1979 .

[34]  P. Marler,et al.  Communication Goes Multimodal , 1999, Science.

[35]  K. Wells,et al.  Vocal behavior of the neotropical treefrog Hyla phlebodes , 1984 .

[36]  T. Grafe.  Graded Aggressive Calls in the African Painted Reed Frog Hyperolius marmoratus (Hyperoliidae) , 2010 .

[37]  Donald E. Kroodsma.  Inappropriate experimental designs impede progress in bioacoustic research: A reply , 1989, Animal Behaviour.

[38]  O. Leimar,et al.  Evolution of Fighting Behaviour: Decision Rules and Assessment of Relative Strength , 1983 .

[39]  Gareth Arnott,et al.  Information gathering and decision making about resource value in animal contests , 2008, Animal Behaviour.

[40]  G. Parker,et al.  Assessment strategy and the evolution of fighting behaviour. , 1974, Journal of theoretical biology.

[41]  H. Heying.  Social and reproductive behaviour in the Madagascan poison frog, Mantella laevigata, with comparisons to the dendrobatids , 2001, Animal Behaviour.

[42]  S. Riechert.  Maynard Smith & Parker's (1976) rule book for animal contests, mostly , 2013, Animal Behaviour.

[43]  G. Parker,et al.  Role assessment, reserve strategy, and acquisition of information in asymmetric animal conflicts , 1981, Animal Behaviour.

[44]  D. Brust.  Maternal Brood Care by Dendrobates pumilio: A Frog That Feeds Its Young , 1993 .

[45]  A. Feng,et al.  Diversity of the Vocal Signals of Concave-Eared Torrent Frogs (Odorrana tormota): Evidence for Individual Signatures , 2009 .

[46]  J. MacDougal,et al.  Territoriality and Homing Behavior in the Poison Dart Frog (Dendrobates pumilio) , 1981 .

[47]  Mace A. Hack,et al.  Assessment strategies in the contests of male crickets, Acheta domesticus (L.) , 1997, Animal Behaviour.

[48]  K. Prestwich,et al.  The Energetics of Acoustic Signaling in Anurans and Insects , 1994 .

[49]  W. Hödl,et al.  Who is Calling? Intraspecific Call Variation in the Aromobatid Frog Allobates femoralis , 2009 .

[50]  M. A. Bee,et al.  Habituation and sensitization of aggression in bullfrogs (Rana catesbeiana): testing the dual-process theory of habituation. , 2001, Journal of comparative psychology.

[51]  R. Nelson,et al.  Neural mechanisms of aggression , 2007, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[52]  R. Haven Wiley,et al.  Noise Matters: The Evolution of Communication , 2015 .

[53]  J. Stynoski.  Discrimination of offspring by indirect recognition in an egg-feeding dendrobatid frog, Oophaga pumilio , 2009, Animal Behaviour.

[54]  S. A. Perrill,et al.  Habituation in the green frog, Rana clamitans , 1998, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[55]  W. Hödl,et al.  From uni- to multimodality: towards an integrative view on anuran communication , 2014, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[56]  Arnold G. Kluge,et al.  The life history, social organization, and parental behavior of Hyla rosenbergi Boulenger, a nest-building gladiator frog. , 1981 .

[57]  L. Petrinovich.  CHAPTER 2 – A Two-Factor Dual-Process Theory of Habituation and Sensitization , 1984 .

[58]  To beg or to freeze: multimodal sensory integration directs behavior in a tadpole , 2012, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[59]  D. A. Nelson,et al.  'Intentional' signaling in Animal communication. , 1991, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[60]  C. Catchpole.  Pseudoreplication and external validity: Playback experiments in avian bioacoustics , 1989 .

[61]  M. D. Beecher.  Kin recognition: Successes and failures of parent–offspring recognition in animals , 1991 .

[62]  A neural and behavioral study of auditory habituation in the bullfrog,Rana catesbeiana , 1983, Journal of comparative physiology.

[63]  W F Martin,et al.  Mechanics of sound production in toads of the genus Bufo: passive elements. , 1971, The Journal of experimental zoology.

[64]  D. Stuart-Fox.  Testing game theory models: fighting ability and decision rules in chameleon contests , 2006, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[65]  W. Hödl,et al.  Parental investment, potential reproductive rates, and mating system in the strawberry dart-poison frog, Dendrobates pumilio , 1999, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[66]  J. Alcock.  Animal Behavior: An Evolutionary Approach , 1975 .

[67]  R. H. Wiley,et al.  Recognition of Neighbors' Duets By Stripe-Backed Wrens Campylorhynchus Nuchalis , 1977 .

[68]  T. Gentner.  Neural Systems for Individual Song Recognition in Adult Birds , 2004, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[69]  H. Carl Gerhardt,et al.  Multiple messages in acoustic signals , 1992 .

[70]  D. Kroodsma.  Using appropriate experimental designs for intended hypotheses in ‘song’ playbacks, with examples for testing effects of song repertoire sizes , 1990, Animal Behaviour.

[71]  The significance of water surface-waves in the communication of fire-bellied toads , 2004, Naturwissenschaften.

[72]  M. D. Beecher.  Signalling systems for individual recognition: an information theory approach , 1989, Animal Behaviour.

[73]  J. Bradbury,et al.  Principles of animal communication, 2nd ed. , 2011 .

[74]  M. A. Donnelly.  Demographic Effects of Reproductive Resource Supplementation in a Territorial Frog, Dendrobates Pumilio , 1989 .

[75]  William A. Searcy,et al.  Song as an aggressive signal in songbirds , 2009, Animal Behaviour.

[76]  Call timing is determined by response call type, but not by stimulus properties, in the treefrog Dendropsophus ebraccatus , 2012, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[77]  M. Ryan,et al.  Functional Mapping of the Auditory Midbrain during Mate Call Reception , 2004, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[78]  T. Getty.  Dear Enemies and the Prisoner's Dilemma: Why Should Territorial Neighbors Form Defensive Coalitions? , 1987 .

[79]  C. M. Lessells,et al.  Unrepeatable repeatabilities: a common mistake , 1987 .

[80]  K. Wells,et al.  Interspecific acoustic interactions of the neotropical treefrog Hyla ebraccata , 1984, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[81]  R. D. Howard.  The Influence of Male-Defended Oviposition Sites on Early Embryo Mortality in Bullfrogs , 1978 .

[82]  D. Papaj,et al.  Complex signal function: developing a framework of testable hypotheses , 2004, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[83]  H. Pröhl,et al.  Female activity patterns and aggressiveness in the strawberry poison frog Dendrobates pumilio (Anura: Dendrobatidae) , 2002 .

[84]  N. Davies,et al.  Competitive mate searching in male common toads, Bufo bufo , 1979, Animal Behaviour.

[85]  S. Shettleworth.  Cognition, evolution, and behavior , 1998 .

[86]  Neil B. Metcalfe,et al.  Fighting in fiddler crabs Uca mjoebergi: what determines duration? , 2005, Animal Behaviour.

[87]  O. Leimar,et al.  A TEST OF THE SEQUENTIAL ASSESSMENT GAME: FIGHTING IN THE BOWL AND DOILY SPIDER FRONTINELLA PYRAMITELA , 1991, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[88]  H. Pröhl.  Variation in Male Calling Behaviour and Relation to Male Mating Success in the Strawberry Poison Frog (Dendrobates pumilio) , 2003 .

[89]  E. N. Sokolov,et al.  Perception and the Conditioned Reflex , 1965 .

[90]  Intrasexual competition, territoriality and acoustic communication in male strawberry poison frogs (Oophaga pumilio) , 2012, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[91]  J. Schwartz.  Male Advertisement and Female Choice in Frogs: Recent Findings and New Approaches to the Study of Communication in a Dynamic Acoustic Environment , 1994 .

[92]  D. Kemp,et al.  Sequential size assessment and multicomponent decision rules mediate aerial wasp contests , 2006, Animal Behaviour.

[93]  E. Shy.  Individuality in the mating calls of the treefrog Hyla arborea savignyi , 1985 .

[94]  T. A. Jenssen,et al.  Size-Related Variation in the Advertisement Call of Rana clamitans (Anura: Ranidae), and Its Effect on Conspecific Males , 1983 .

[95]  K. Wells,et al.  The effect of social interactions on calling energetics in the gray treefrog (Hyla versicolor) , 1986, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[96]  D. Lesbarrères,et al.  Variations in male calls and responses to an unfamiliar advertisement call in a territorial breeding anuran, Rana dalmatina: evidence for a “dear enemy” effect , 2002 .

[97]  K. Wells,et al.  Vocal communication in a neotropical treefrog, Hyla ebraccata: Advertisement calls , 1984, Animal Behaviour.

[98]  William E. Wagner.  Social Correlates of Variation in Male Calling Behavior in Blanchard's Cricket Frog, Acris crepitans blanchardi , 2010 .

[99]  E. Temeles.  The role of neighbours in territorial systems: when are they 'dear enemies'? , 1994, Animal Behaviour.

[100]  W. Hödl,et al.  Site fidelity and patterns of short- and long-term movement in the brilliant-thighed poison frog Allobates femoralis (Aromobatidae) , 2009, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[101]  Bernd Fritzsch,et al.  The Evolution of the amphibian auditory system , 1988 .

[102]  R. Brooks,et al.  Individual recognition by song in white-throated sparrows. II. Effects of location , 1975 .

[103]  Y. Hsu,et al.  Switching assessment strategy during a contest: fighting in killifish Kryptolebias marmoratus , 2008, Animal Behaviour.

[104]  D. Siddle,et al.  Orienting, habituation, and resource allocation: an associative analysis. , 1991, Psychophysiology.

[105]  P. M. Narins,et al.  The rôle of call frequency and the auditory papillae in phonotactic behavior in male Dart-poison frogs Epipedobates femoralis (Dendrobatidae) , 2004, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[106]  M. Ferragamo,et al.  Auditory nerve representation of a complex communication sound in background noise. , 1992, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[107]  A. Pyron,et al.  A large-scale phylogeny of Amphibia including over 2800 species, and a revised classification of extant frogs, salamanders, and caecilians. , 2011, Molecular phylogenetics and evolution.

[108]  J M Smith,et al.  Evolution and the theory of games , 1976 .

[109]  William E. Wagner.  Deceptive or honest signalling of fighting ability? A test of alternative hypotheses for the function of changes in call dominant frequency by male cricket frogs , 1992, Animal Behaviour.

[110]  A M Simmons,et al.  Periodicity extraction in the anuran auditory nerve. II: Phase and temporal fine structure. , 1993, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[111]  L. L. Wolf,et al.  Modulation of aggressive behaviour by fighting experience: mechanisms and contest outcomes , 2005, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[112]  H. Pröhl.  Population differences in female resource abundance, adult sex ratio, and male mating success in Dendrobates pumilio , 2002 .

[113]  M. E. Roithmair.  Territoriality and Male Mating Success in the Dart-poison Frog, Epipedobates femoralis (Dendrobatidae, Anura) , 2010 .

[114]  Mark Pagel,et al.  Escalation and Time Costs in Displays of Endurance , 1996 .

[115]  H. Gerhardt,et al.  Female mate choice in treefrogs: static and dynamic acoustic criteria , 1991, Animal Behaviour.

[116]  John Maynard Smith,et al.  The logic of asymmetric contests , 1976, Animal Behaviour.

[117]  E. Gering,et al.  APOSEMATIC SIGNAL VARIATION PREDICTS MALE–MALE INTERACTIONS IN A POLYMORPHIC POISON FROG , 2011, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[118]  M. F. Given.  Territoriality and Aggressive Interactions of Male Carpenter Frogs, Rana virgatipes , 1988 .

[119]  A. Feng,et al.  Vocal acrobatics in a Chinese frog, Amolops tormotus , 2002, Naturwissenschaften.

[120]  W. Hamilton,et al.  The Evolution of Cooperation , 1984 .

[121]  M. A. Bee,et al.  Size assessment in simulated territorial encounters between male green frogs (Rana clamitans) , 1999, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[122]  M. Reichert.  Aggressive thresholds in Dendropsophus ebraccatus: habituation and sensitization to different call types , 2010, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[123]  Peter M. Narins,et al.  Ultrasonic communication in frogs , 2006, Nature.

[124]  Peter M. Narins,et al.  Seismic Communication in Anuran AmphibiansWhite-lipped frogs thump the ground as they chirp , 1990 .

[125]  M. Ryan.  The Reproductive Behavior of the Bullfrog (Rana catesbeiana) , 1980 .

[126]  M. Taborsky,et al.  What sets the odds of winning and losing? , 2006, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[127]  M. A. Bee,et al.  Territorial male bullfrogs (Rana catesbeiana) do not assess fighting ability based on size- related variation in acoustic signals , 2002 .

[128]  J. W. Whitlow.  CHAPTER 4 – Memory and Habituation , 1984 .

[129]  A. Feng,et al.  Active control of ultrasonic hearing in frogs , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[130]  M. Reichert.  Sources of variability in advertisement and aggressive calling in competitive interactions in the grey treefrog, Hyla versicolor , 2013 .

[131]  R. A. Pereira,et al.  Mortal combat and competition for oviposition sites in female pollinating fig wasps , 2015 .

[132]  A. Dhondt,et al.  Individual Voice Discrimination in Birds , 1995 .

[133]  Peter Marler,et al.  The perception of birdsong and an ecological concept of signal space. , 1990 .

[134]  H. Gerhardt,et al.  Behavioral strategies and signaling in interspecific aggressive interactions in gray tree frogs , 2014 .

[135]  A test of the "dear enemy effect" in the strawberry dart-poison frog (Dendrobates pumilio) , 2003, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[136]  L. Giraldeau,et al.  Neighbours, strangers, and the asymmetric war of attrition , 1988, Animal Behaviour.

[137]  M. E. Roithmair.  Field studies on reproductive behaviour in two dart-poison frog species (Epipedobates femoralis, Epipedobates trivittatus) in Amazonian Peru , 1994 .

[138]  Edwin R. Lewis,et al.  Acoustically induced call modification in the white-lipped frog, Leptodactylus albilabris , 1988, Animal Behaviour.

[139]  O. Sexton.  Some Aspects of the Behavior and of the Territory of A Dendrobatid Frog, Prostherapis Trinitatis , 1960 .

[140]  P. Groves,et al.  Habituation: a dual-process theory. , 1970, Psychological review.

[141]  G. Klump,et al.  THE VOCAL BEHAVIOUR OF MALE EUROPEAN TREEFROGS (HYLA ARBOREA): IMPLICATIONS FOR INTER- AND INTRASEXUAL SELECTION , 2002 .

[142]  Andrea Megela Simmons,et al.  ATMOSPHERIC AND UNDERWATER PROPAGATION OF BULLFROG VOCALIZATIONS , 1999 .

[143]  P. Hurd.  Resource holding potential, subjective resource value, and game theoretical models of aggressiveness signalling. , 2006, Journal of theoretical biology.

[144]  R. Dawkins,et al.  Animal signals: information or manipulation? , 1978 .

[145]  T. Wiewandt.  Vocalization, Aggressive Behavior, and Territoriality in the Bullfrog, Rana catesbeiana , 1969 .

[146]  A. Feng,et al.  Neighbor-Stranger Discrimination in Concave-Eared Torrent Frogs, Odorrana tormota , 2009 .

[147]  R. Elwood,et al.  Understanding how animals fight with Lloyd Morgan's canon , 2012, Animal Behaviour.

[148]  H. Gerhardt,et al.  Individual voice recognition in a territorial frog (Rana catesbeiana) , 2002, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[149]  John Alcock.  Animal behavior: An evolutionary approach, 4th ed. , 1989 .

[150]  S. Nowicki,et al.  The Evolution of Animal Communication: Reliability and Deception in Signaling Systems: Reliability and Deception in Signaling Systems , 2005 .

[151]  K. Wells.  The Ecology and Behavior of Amphibians , 2007 .

[152]  G. Bourne,et al.  Quantitative acoustic analysis of the vocal repertoire of the golden rocket frog (Anomaloglossus beebei). , 2012, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[153]  A. Feng,et al.  Ultrasonic communication in concave-eared torrent frogs (Amolops tormotus) , 2008, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[154]  M. A. Bee,et al.  Within-individual variation in bullfrog vocalizations: implications for a vocally mediated social recognition system. , 2004, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[155]  G. Bourne,et al.  Vocal Communication and Reproductive Behavior of the Frog Colostethus beebei in Guyana , 2001 .

[156]  S. C. Humfeld,et al.  Plasticity of aggressive signalling and its evolution in male spring peepers, Pseudacris crucifer , 2003, Animal Behaviour.

[157]  Walter Hödl,et al.  Phonotactic approach pattern in the neotropical frog Allobates femoralis: A spatial and temporal analysis , 2009 .

[158]  H. Jasper,et al.  Habituation of the arousal reaction. , 1956, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[159]  P. Bunnell.  Vocalizations in the Territorial Behavior of the Frog Dendrobates pumilio , 1973 .

[160]  William E. Wagner.  Fighting, assessment, and frequency alteration in Blanchard's cricket frog , 1989, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[161]  K. Wells.  The social behaviour of anuran amphibians , 1977, Animal Behaviour.

[162]  T. Peake,et al.  Animal Communication Networks: Eavesdropping in communication networks , 2005 .

[163]  S. A. Perrill,et al.  Responses To Conspecific Advertisement Calls in the Green Frog (Rana Clamitans) and Their Role in Male-Male Communication , 1996 .

[164]  J. M. Smith,et al.  Do animals convey information about their intentions , 1982 .

[165]  Olaf Berke,et al.  Spatial distributions of male and female strawberry poison frogs and their relation to female reproductive resources , 2001, Oecologia.

[166]  J. Rillich,et al.  Assessment strategy of fighting crickets revealed by manipulating information exchange , 2007, Animal Behaviour.

[167]  J. Schwartz,et al.  Graded aggressive calls of the spring peeper, Pseudacris crucifer , 1989 .

[168]  H. Endepols,et al.  Central Auditory Pathways in Anuran Amphibians: The Anatomical Basis of Hearing and Sound Communication , 2007 .

[169]  J. Krebs,et al.  Spacing and calling in Pacific tree frogs, Hyla regilla , 1975 .

[170]  A. Feng,et al.  Old world frog and bird vocalizations contain prominent ultrasonic harmonics. , 2004, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[171]  N. Davies,et al.  Optimal mate selection in the toad Bufo bufo , 1977, Nature.

[172]  A. Feng,et al.  Voices of the dead: complex nonlinear vocal signals from the larynx of an ultrasonic frog , 2006, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[173]  Mark A. Bee,et al.  Anuran Acoustic Signal Production in Noisy Environments , 2013 .

[174]  J. Krebs,et al.  An introduction to behavioural ecology , 1981 .

[175]  M. Reichert.  Playback tests and studies of animal contest dynamics: concepts and an example in the gray tree frog , 2014 .

[176]  R. Elwood,et al.  The mismeasure of animal contests , 2003, Animal Behaviour.

[177]  R. D. Howard.  THE EVOLUTION OF MATING STRATEGIES IN BULLFROGS, RANA CATESBEIANA , 1978, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[178]  John Prenter,et al.  Self-assessment by males during energetically costly contests over precopula females in amphipods , 2006, Animal Behaviour.

[179]  R. D. Howard,et al.  Individual variation in male vocal traits and female mating preferences in Bufo americanus , 1998, Animal Behaviour.

[180]  A. Bond.  Toward a Resolution of the Paradox of Aggressive Displays: II. Behavioral Efference and the Communication of Intentions , 2010 .

[181]  R. Elwood,et al.  Difficulties remain in distinguishing between mutual and self-assessment in animal contests , 2009, Animal Behaviour.

[182]  H. Gerhardt,et al.  Socially mediated plasticity in call timing in the gray tree frog, Hyla versicolor , 2013 .

[183]  T. Grafe.  Animal Communication Networks: Anuran choruses as communication networks , 2005 .

[184]  S. West,et al.  Fighting strategies in two species of fig wasp , 2008, Animal Behaviour.

[185]  W. Wheeler,et al.  PHYLOGENETIC SYSTEMATICS OF DART-POISON FROGS AND THEIR RELATIVES (AMPHIBIA: ATHESPHATANURA: DENDROBATIDAE) , 2006 .

[186]  H. Pröhl.  Territorial Behavior in Dendrobatid Frogs , 2005 .

[187]  D. Falconer,et al.  Introduction to Quantitative Genetics. , 1962 .

[188]  Aggressive calls improve leading callers’ attractiveness in the treefrog Dendropsophus ebraccatus , 2011 .

[189]  S. Castellano,et al.  Stabilizing and directional female choice for male calls in the European green toad , 1998, Animal Behaviour.

[190]  Chiaki I. Yasuda,et al.  Assessment strategy in male–male contests of the hermit crab Pagurus middendorffii , 2012, Animal Behaviour.

[191]  K. Wells,et al.  Intra- and Interspecific Vocal Behavior of the Neotropical Treefrog Hyla microcephala , 1985 .

[192]  H. Gerhardt,et al.  Gray tree frogs, Hyla versicolor, give lower-frequency aggressive calls in more escalated contests , 2013, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[193]  C. Marler,et al.  Arginine Vasotocin Injection Increases Probability of Calling in Cricket Frogs, but Causes Call Changes Characteristic of Less Aggressive Males , 1995, Hormones and Behavior.

[194]  T. Schachtman,et al.  Is habituation a mechanism for neighbor recognition in green frogs? , 2000, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[195]  A. Simmons.  “To Ear is Human, to Frogive is Divine”: Bob Capranica’s legacy to auditory neuroethology , 2012, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[196]  D. M. Allan.  Some relationships of vocalization tó behavior in the Pacific treefrog, Hyla regilla , 1973 .

[197]  L. Dugatkin,et al.  On Wars of Attrition Without Assessment , 1996 .

[198]  A. Feng,et al.  Ultrasound-evoked immediate early gene expression in the brainstem of the Chinese torrent frog, Odorrana tormota , 2011, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[199]  R. J. Payne,et al.  Gradually escalating fights and displays: the cumulative assessment model , 1998, Animal Behaviour.

[200]  H. Gerhardt,et al.  Trade-Offs and Upper Limits to Signal Performance during Close-Range Vocal Competition in Gray Tree Frogs Hyla versicolor , 2012, The American Naturalist.

[201]  M. L. Crump.  Aggression in harlequin frogs: male-male competition and a possible conflict of interest between the sexes , 1988, Animal Behaviour.

[202]  M. A. Bee,et al.  Individual variation in advertisement calls of territorial male green frogs, Rana clamitans : implications for individual discrimination , 2001 .

[203]  J. Schwartz.  The importance of spectral and temporal properties in species and call recognition in a neotropical treefrog with a complex vocal repertoire , 1987, Animal Behaviour.

[204]  Donald E. Kroodsma,et al.  Pseudoreplication in playback experiments, revisited a decade later , 2001, Animal Behaviour.

[205]  K. Wells.  Territoriality in the green frog (Rana clamitans): Vocalizations and agonistic behaviour , 1978, Animal Behaviour.

[206]  R. Jaeger.  Dear Enemy Recognition and the Costs of Aggression between Salamanders , 1981, The American Naturalist.

[207]  P. Backwell,et al.  Residency and size affect fight duration and outcome in the fiddler crab Uca annulipes , 1996 .

[208]  M. Ryan,et al.  Temporal call changes and prior experience affect graded signalling in the cricket frog , 1999, Animal Behaviour.

[209]  Peter M. Narins,et al.  Ultrasonic frogs show hyperacute phonotaxis to female courtship calls , 2008, Nature.

[210]  Mark A. Bee,et al.  Neighbour–stranger discrimination by territorial male bullfrogs (Rana catesbeiana): I. Acoustic basis , 2001, Animal Behaviour.

[211]  H. Kokko.  Dyadic contests: modelling flights between two individuals , 2013 .

[212]  E. Wilson.  Sociobiology: The New Synthesis , 1976 .

[213]  M. A. Bee,et al.  Assessing Acoustic Signal Variability and the Potential for Sexual Selection and Social Recognition in Boreal Chorus Frogs (Pseudacris maculata) , 2010 .

[214]  P. Owen,et al.  The effect of perceived intruder proximity and resident body size on the aggressive responses of male green frogs, Rana clamitans (Anura: Ranidae) , 2005, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[215]  Mark A. Bee,et al.  Experience-based plasticity of acoustically evoked aggression in a territorial frog , 2003, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[216]  J. Maynard Smith,et al.  Must reliable signals always be costly? , 1994, Animal Behaviour.

[217]  J. Rillich,et al.  Adding up the odds—Nitric oxide signaling underlies the decision to flee and post-conflict depression of aggression , 2015, Science Advances.

[218]  D. Lesbarrères,et al.  Multiple paternity in Rana dalmatina, a monogamous territorial breeding anuran , 2003, Naturwissenschaften.

[219]  M Briffa,et al.  Cumulative or sequential assessment during hermit crab shell fights: effects of oxygen on decision rules , 2000, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[220]  Eliot A. Brenowitz.  Neighbor Call Amplitude Influences Aggressive Behavior and Intermale Spacing in Choruses of the Pacific Treefrog (Hyla regilla) , 2010 .

[221]  G. Fellers.  Aggression, territoriality, and mating behaviour in North American treefrogs , 1979, Animal Behaviour.

[222]  G. Orians,et al.  Familiar neighbors enhance breeding success in birds. , 1989, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[223]  M. F. Given.  Male response to female vocalizations in the carpenter frog, Rana virgatipes , 1993, Animal Behaviour.

[224]  M. Mesterton-Gibbons,et al.  Variation between Self- and Mutual Assessment in Animal Contests , 2013, The American Naturalist.

[225]  W. Hödl,et al.  Intrusion Experiments to Measure Territory Size: Development of the Method, Tests through Simulations, and Application in the Frog Allobates femoralis , 2011, PloS one.

[226]  K. Wells,et al.  An experimental study of acoustic interference between two species of neotropical treefrogs , 1983, Animal Behaviour.

[227]  Z. T. Halpin.  Individual Odors among Mammals: Origins and Functions , 1986 .

[228]  M. A. Bee,et al.  Male green frogs lower the pitch of acoustic signals in defense of territories: a possible dishonest signal of size? , 2000 .

[229]  M. F. Given.  FREQUENCY ALTERATION OF THE ADVERTISEMENT CALL IN THE CARPENTER FROG, RANA VIRGATIPES , 1999 .

[230]  Inter-male spacing in choruses of the spring peeper, Pseudacris (Hyla) crucifer , 1989, Animal Behaviour.

[231]  M. A. Bee,et al.  Individual Recognition in Animal Species , 2006 .

[232]  O. Leimar,et al.  Evolution of fighting behaviour: The effect of variation in resource value , 1987 .

[233]  H. Gerhardt,et al.  The role of body size on the outcome, escalation and duration of contests in the grey treefrog, Hyla versicolor , 2011, Animal Behaviour.

[234]  A. Simmons,et al.  Encoding of a spectrally-complex communication sound in the bullfrog's auditory nerve , 1990, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[235]  S. Emlen.  Territoriality in the Bullfrog, Rana catesbeiana , 1968 .

[236]  B. Sullivan.  Sexual selection in Woodhouse's toad (Bufo woodhousei) I. Chorus organization , 1982, Animal Behaviour.

[237]  B. Martof.  Territoriality in the Green Frog, Rana Clamitans , 1953 .

[238]  G. Arnott,et al.  Assessments in contests are frequently assumed to be complex when simple explanations will suffice , 2013, Animal Behaviour.

[239]  H. Gerhardt,et al.  Habituation as a mechanism of reduced aggression between neighboring territorial male bullfrogs (Rana catesbeiana). , 2001, Journal of comparative psychology.

[240]  H. V. Peeke,et al.  Chapter 2 – Habituation in Fish with Special Reference to Intraspecific Aggressive Behavior , 1973 .

[241]  D. C. Forester,et al.  Geographic variation in mating call among the four subspecies of the chorus frog: Pseudacris triseriata (Wied) , 1988 .

[242]  T. Ljungberg,et al.  A test of the sequential assessment game: fighting in the cichlid fish Nannacara anomala , 1990, Animal Behaviour.

[243]  K. Wells,et al.  Vocal Communication in a Neotropical Treefrog, Hyla Ebraccata: Aggressive Calls , 1984 .

[244]  Mark S. Davis,et al.  Acoustically mediated neighbor recognition in the North American bullfrog, Rana catesbeiana , 1987, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[245]  L. Sneddon,et al.  Physiological constraints on contest behaviour , 2007 .

[246]  W. Piper,et al.  Fatal battles in common loons: a preliminary analysis , 2008, Animal Behaviour.

[247]  J. Dale,et al.  Individual recognition: it is good to be different. , 2007, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[248]  Donald E. Kroodsma,et al.  The Effect of Large Song Repertoires on Neighbor "Recognition" in Male Song Sparrows , 1976 .

[249]  J. M. Smith,et al.  The Logic of Animal Conflict , 1973, Nature.

[250]  K. Wells.  Territoriality and male mating success in the green frog (Rana clamitans) , 1977 .

[251]  Junxian Shen,et al.  Ultrasonic frogs show extraordinary sex differences in auditory frequency sensitivity. , 2011, Nature communications.

[252]  M. Reichert.  Patterns of variability are consistent across signal types in the treefrog Dendropsophus ebraccatus , 2013 .

[253]  M. A. Donnelly.  Effects of reproductive resource supplementation on space-use patterns in Dendrobates pumilio , 1989, Oecologia.

[254]  J. Swallow,et al.  Sequential analysis of aggressive interactions in the stalk-eyed fly Teleopsis dalmanni , 2011, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[255]  S. Emlen.  Lek organization and mating strategies in the bullfrog , 1976, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[256]  J M Smith.  Game theory and the evolution of behaviour , 1979, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[257]  H. V. Peeke.  CHAPTER 11 – Habituation and the Maintenance of Territorial Boundaries , 1984 .