Localized Delay-bounded and Energy-efficient Data Aggregation in low-traffic request-driven wireless sensor and actor networks

We propose a localized Delay-bounded and Energy-efficient Data Aggregation scheme (DEDA) for wireless sensor and actor networks that are modeled as undirected graphs (URG). The scheme is based on a novel concept of Desired Hop Progress (DHP) and designed for low-traffic, request-driven network scenarios, where delay is proportional to hop count [10]. It builds a local minimal spanning tree (LMST) sub-graph of the network with links weighted by transmission powers. Using edges from LMST, it constructs a shortest path (thus energy-efficient) tree rooted at actor (sink) for data aggregation. The tree is used as is if it generates acceptable delay. Otherwise, it is adjusted by replacing LMST sub-paths with URG edges. The adjustment is done locally, according to the DHP value at each node, with hop count reduction corresponding to the delay allowance per hop (ratio of current LMST delay over maximal allowed one). Through extensive simulation, we show that DEDA may save 25–75% energy per node on average and extend up to 150% network life, depending on network conditions, in comparison with the only existing competing localized solution [11].

[1]  Ivan Stojmenovic,et al.  Localized sensor area coverage with low communication overhead , 2006, Fourth Annual IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications (PERCOM'06).

[2]  Ajay D. Kshemkalyani,et al.  Clock synchronization for wireless sensor networks: a survey , 2005, Ad Hoc Networks.

[3]  Shaojie Tang,et al.  A Delay-Efficient Algorithm for Data Aggregation in Multihop Wireless Sensor Networks , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems.

[4]  D. Malone,et al.  Modeling the 802.11 Distributed Coordination Function in Nonsaturated Heterogeneous Conditions , 2007, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking.

[5]  Viktor K. Prasanna,et al.  Energy-latency tradeoffs for data gathering in wireless sensor networks , 2004, IEEE INFOCOM 2004.

[6]  Gaetano Borriello,et al.  Location Systems for Ubiquitous Computing , 2001, Computer.

[7]  Ivan Stojmenovic,et al.  Geocasting with guaranteed delivery in sensor networks , 2004, IEEE Wireless Communications.

[8]  Wendi Heinzelman,et al.  Energy-efficient communication protocol for wireless microsensor networks , 2000, Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[9]  Lui Sha,et al.  Design and analysis of an MST-based topology control algorithm , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[10]  Peter Deuflhard,et al.  Numerische Mathematik. I , 2002 .

[11]  Dario Pompili,et al.  A distributed coordination framework for wireless sensor and actor networks , 2005, MobiHoc '05.

[12]  Raghupathy Sivakumar,et al.  Practical limits on achievable energy improvements and useable delay tolerance in correlation aware data gathering in wireless sensor networks , 2005, 2005 Second Annual IEEE Communications Society Conference on Sensor and Ad Hoc Communications and Networks, 2005. IEEE SECON 2005..

[13]  David Simplot-Ryl,et al.  Energy-efficient area monitoring for sensor networks , 2004, Computer.

[14]  Ivan Stojmenovic,et al.  A Distributed and Dynamic Data Gathering Protocol for Sensor Networks , 2007, 21st International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications (AINA '07).

[15]  Edsger W. Dijkstra,et al.  A note on two problems in connexion with graphs , 1959, Numerische Mathematik.

[16]  Gregory G. Finn,et al.  Routing and Addressing Problems in Large Metropolitan-Scale Internetworks. ISI Research Report. , 1987 .

[17]  Teresa H. Meng,et al.  Minimum energy mobile wireless networks , 1998, ICC '98. 1998 IEEE International Conference on Communications. Conference Record. Affiliated with SUPERCOMM'98 (Cat. No.98CH36220).

[18]  Deborah Estrin,et al.  The impact of data aggregation in wireless sensor networks , 2002, Proceedings 22nd International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems Workshops.