Location of a grasped object’s effector influences perception of the length of that object via dynamic touch

Perception of properties of a grasped object via dynamic touch (wielding) contributes to dexterity in tool use (e.g., using a hammer, screwdriver) and sports (e.g., hockey, tennis). These activities differ from simple object manipulation in that they involve making contact with an intended target. In the present study, we examined whether and how making (percussive) contact with a target influences perception of the length of a grasped object via dynamic touch. Making contact with a target by the tip resulted in a more accurate perception of the length than simple wielding. However, making contact with the target at a point along the length did not influence the accuracy of perception. These findings suggest that the location of a grasped object’s effector influences perception of properties of that object via dynamic touch. We discuss these findings in terms of time-varying properties of vibrations generated by the percussive contact of the grasped object and target.

[1]  A. Smitsman,et al.  Affordances, perceptual complexity, and the development of tool use. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[2]  Claudia Carello,et al.  Haptic selective attention by foot and by hand , 2007, Neuroscience Letters.

[3]  M T Turvey,et al.  Haptic probing: Perceiving the length of a probe and the distance of a surface probed , 1992, Perception & psychophysics.

[4]  Steven J. Harrison,et al.  Comparison of Dynamic (Effortful) Touch by Hand and Foot , 2007, Journal of motor behavior.

[5]  K. Newell,et al.  Perception of the length of an object through dynamic touch is invariant across changes in the medium , 2017, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[6]  J. Achenbach.  Wave propagation in elastic solids , 1962 .

[7]  M T Turvey,et al.  Role of the inertia tensor in haptically perceiving where an object is grasped. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[8]  J. Wagman,et al.  Task specificity and anatomical independence in perception of properties by means of a wielded object. , 2014, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[9]  Rob Withagen,et al.  Transfer of calibration in length perception by dynamic touch , 2004, Perception & psychophysics.

[10]  Chris Baber.  Cognition and Tool Use: Forms of Engagement in Human and Animal Use of Tools , 2003 .

[11]  Michael T. Turvey,et al.  Perceiving the Lengths of Rods That are Held But Not Wielded , 1990 .

[12]  M. Turvey,et al.  Eigenvalues of the inertia tensor and exteroception by the “muscular sense” , 1994, Neuroscience.

[13]  Michael T. Turvey,et al.  Effortful touch with minimal movement , 1992 .

[14]  E. Reed.  The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception , 1989 .

[15]  Raoul M. Bongers,et al.  Joint-Angle Coordination Patterns Ensure Stabilization of a Body-Plus-Tool System in Point-to-Point Movements with a Rod , 2016, Front. Psychol..

[16]  C. Carello,et al.  Perception of Object Length by Sound , 1998 .

[17]  M T Turvey,et al.  Can shape be perceived by dynamic touch? , 1990, Perception & psychophysics.

[18]  K. Newell,et al.  Temperature influences perception of the length of a wielded object via effortful touch , 2018, Experimental Brain Research.

[19]  S. Lederman,et al.  Human Hand Function , 2006 .

[20]  C Carello,et al.  Selective perception by dynamic touch , 1996, Perception & psychophysics.

[21]  M T Turvey,et al.  Perceiving the width and height of a hand-held object by dynamic touch. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[22]  Drew H. Abney,et al.  Transfer of recalibration from audition to touch: modality independence as a special case of anatomical independence. , 2012, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[23]  J. Wagman,et al.  Getting off on the right (or left) foot: perceiving by means of a rod attached to the preferred or non-preferred foot , 2014, Experimental Brain Research.

[24]  M T Turvey,et al.  Eigenvectors of the inertia tensor and perceiving the orientation of a hand-held object by dynamic touch , 1992, Perception & psychophysics.

[25]  Michael T Turvey,et al.  The Medium of Haptic Perception: A Tensegrity Hypothesis , 2014, Journal of motor behavior.

[26]  J. Gibson.  The Senses Considered As Perceptual Systems , 1967 .

[27]  Madhur Mangalam,et al.  Transforming the body-only system into the body-plus-tool system , 2016, Animal Behaviour.

[28]  M T Turvey,et al.  Tensorial basis to the constancy of perceived object extent over variations of dynamic touch , 1993, Perception & psychophysics.

[29]  M T Turvey,et al.  Perceptual independence of whole length, partial length, and hand position in wielding a rod. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[30]  M T Turvey,et al.  Principles of Part–Whole Selective Perception by Dynamic Touch Extend to the Torso , 2011, Journal of motor behavior.

[31]  T. Higuchi,et al.  Turning perception on its head: cephalic perception of whole and partial length of a wielded object , 2016, Experimental Brain Research.

[32]  M T Turvey,et al.  Role of the inertia tensor in perceiving object orientation by dynamic touch. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[33]  Self-trained perception need not be veridical: striking can exaggerate judgment by wielding and can transfer exaggeration to new stimuli , 2015, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[34]  M T Turvey,et al.  Obtaining information by dynamic (effortful) touching , 2011, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[35]  Michael T. Turvey,et al.  Perceiving extents of rods by wielding: haptic diagonalization and decomposition of the inertia tensor. , 1989 .

[36]  Michael T. Turvey,et al.  Rotational Invariants and Dynamic Touch , 2003 .