Perceived Depth in Natural Images Reflects Encoding of Low-Level Luminance Statistics

Sighted animals must survive in an environment that is diverse yet highly structured. Neural-coding models predict that the visual system should allocate its computational resources to exploit regularities in the environment, and that this allocation should facilitate perceptual judgments. Here we use three approaches (natural scenes statistical analysis, a reanalysis of single-unit data from alert behaving macaque, and a behavioral experiment in humans) to address the question of how the visual system maximizes behavioral success by taking advantage of low-level regularities in the environment. An analysis of natural scene statistics reveals that the probability distributions for light increments and decrements are biased in a way that could be exploited by the visual system to estimate depth from relative luminance. A reanalysis of neurophysiology data from Samonds et al. (2012) shows that the previously reported joint tuning of V1 cells for relative luminance and binocular disparity is well matched to a predicted distribution of binocular disparities produced by natural scenes. Finally, we show that a percept of added depth can be elicited in images by exaggerating the correlation between luminance and depth. Together, the results from these three approaches provide further evidence that the visual system allocates its processing resources in a way that is driven by the statistics of the natural environment.

[1]  H. Egusa,et al.  Effect of Brightness on Perceived Distance as a Figure—Ground Phenomenon , 1982, Perception.

[2]  Richard Szeliski,et al.  A Taxonomy and Evaluation of Dense Two-Frame Stereo Correspondence Algorithms , 2001, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[3]  W. Geisler Visual perception and the statistical properties of natural scenes. , 2008, Annual review of psychology.

[4]  Jake K. Aggarwal,et al.  Model-based object recognition in dense-range images—a review , 1993, CSUR.

[5]  F. Sumner,et al.  Relation of the brightness differences of color to their apparent distances. , 1948, The Journal of psychology.

[6]  I. Ohzawa,et al.  Stereoscopic depth discrimination in the visual cortex: neurons ideally suited as disparity detectors. , 1990, Science.

[7]  Eero P. Simoncelli,et al.  Implicit encoding of prior probabilities in optimal neural populations , 2010, NIPS.

[8]  Inez Taylor,et al.  Actual Brightness and Distance of Individual Colors when Their Apparent Distance is Held Constant , 1945 .

[9]  Nicolas Brunel,et al.  Mutual Information, Fisher Information, and Population Coding , 1998, Neural Computation.

[10]  Rafal Mantiuk,et al.  Evaluation of monocular depth cues on a high-dynamic-range display for visualization , 2013, TAP.

[11]  E H Adelson,et al.  Spatiotemporal energy models for the perception of motion. , 1985, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[12]  Eero P. Simoncelli,et al.  Cardinal rules: Visual orientation perception reflects knowledge of environmental statistics , 2011, Nature Neuroscience.

[13]  Hendrik P. A. Lensch,et al.  Real‐Time Disparity Map‐Based Pictorial Depth Cue Enhancement , 2012, Comput. Graph. Forum.

[14]  J. Dowling,et al.  Organization of the retina of the mudpuppy, Necturus maculosus. II. Intracellular recording. , 1969, Journal of neurophysiology.

[15]  A. Ames Depth in Pictorial Art , 1925 .

[16]  Thomas Euler,et al.  A Tale of Two Retinal Domains: Near-Optimal Sampling of Achromatic Contrasts in Natural Scenes through Asymmetric Photoreceptor Distribution , 2013, Neuron.

[17]  Alan C. Bovik,et al.  Natural scene statistics of color and range , 2011, 2011 18th IEEE International Conference on Image Processing.

[18]  Charless C. Fowlkes,et al.  Natural-Scene Statistics Predict How the Figure–Ground Cue of Convexity Affects Human Depth Perception , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[19]  G. Sperling,et al.  Tradeoffs between stereopsis and proximity luminance covariance as determinants of perceived 3D structure , 1986, Vision Research.

[20]  R. Shapley,et al.  “Black” Responses Dominate Macaque Primary Visual Cortex V1 , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[21]  S. Blackburn,et al.  Contrast as a depth cue , 1994, Vision Research.

[22]  D G Pelli,et al.  The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[23]  H. Kolb,et al.  Intracellular staining reveals different levels of stratification for on- and off-center ganglion cells in cat retina. , 1978, Journal of neurophysiology.

[24]  Matthew Anderson,et al.  Proposal for a Standard Default Color Space for the Internet - sRGB , 1996, CIC.

[25]  Tai Sing Lee,et al.  Statistical correlations between two-dimensional images and three-dimensional structures in natural scenes. , 2003, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[26]  Charles P. Ratliff,et al.  Retina is structured to process an excess of darkness in natural scenes , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[27]  Eero P. Simoncelli,et al.  Natural image statistics and neural representation. , 2001, Annual review of neuroscience.

[28]  Andrew S. Glassner,et al.  Introduction to computer graphics , 2013, SIGGRAPH '13.

[29]  V. S. Ramachandran,et al.  Perception of shape from shading , 1988, Nature.

[30]  D H Brainard,et al.  The Psychophysics Toolbox. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[31]  A. Nieder Stereoscopic Vision: Solving the Correspondence Problem , 2003, Current Biology.

[32]  David R. Badcock,et al.  Global motion perception: Interaction of the ON and OFF pathways , 1994, Vision Research.

[33]  Christopher W. Tyler,et al.  Diffuse illumination as a default assumption for shape-from-shading in the absence of shadows , 1997, Electronic Imaging.

[34]  Tomaso Poggio,et al.  Models of object recognition , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[35]  G. Westheimer The ON–OFF dichotomy in visual processing: From receptors to perception , 2007, Progress in Retinal and Eye Research.

[36]  George Sperling,et al.  Black-white asymmetry in visual perception. , 2012, Journal of vision.

[37]  Heiko Hirschmüller,et al.  Evaluation of Cost Functions for Stereo Matching , 2007, 2007 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[38]  J. P. Kalisvaart,et al.  Motion discrimination under uncertainty and ambiguity. , 2011, Journal of vision.

[39]  H R BLACKWELL,et al.  Contrast thresholds of the human eye. , 1946, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[40]  S. M. Shape-from-shading on a cloudy day , 1992 .

[41]  H. Bülthoff,et al.  Depth Discrimination from Shading under Diffuse Lighting , 2000, Perception.

[42]  Albert Yonas,et al.  Infants and adults use line junction information to perceive 3D shape. , 2012, Journal of vision.

[43]  Alan C. Bovik,et al.  Color and Depth Priors in Natural Images , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[44]  G. Sperling,et al.  Luminance controls the perceived 3-D structure of dynamic 2-D displays. , 1983 .

[45]  J COULES,et al.  Effect of photometric brightness on judgments of distance. , 1955, Journal of experimental psychology.

[46]  Jason M Samonds,et al.  Relative luminance and binocular disparity preferences are correlated in macaque primary visual cortex, matching natural scene statistics , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[47]  Tai Sing Lee,et al.  Scaling Laws in Natural Scenes and the Inference of 3D Shape , 2005, NIPS.

[48]  Julie M. Harris,et al.  Independent neural mechanisms for bright and dark information in binocular stereopsis , 1995, Nature.

[49]  Justin M. Ales,et al.  Flies and humans share a motion estimation strategy that exploits natural scene statistics , 2014, Nature Neuroscience.

[50]  Christopher Joseph Pal,et al.  Learning Conditional Random Fields for Stereo , 2007, 2007 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[51]  Yang Liu,et al.  Dichotomy between luminance and disparity features at binocular fixations. , 2010, Journal of vision.

[52]  M Farnè,et al.  Brightness as an Indicator to Distance: Relative Brightness per Se or Contrast with the Background? , 1977, Perception.

[53]  H. Egusa,et al.  Effects of Brightness, Hue, and Saturation on Perceived Depth between Adjacent Regions in the Visual Field , 1983, Perception.

[54]  Johannes Burge,et al.  The vertical horopter is not adaptable, but it may be adaptive. , 2011, Journal of vision.

[55]  Jiri Najemnik,et al.  Optimal stimulus encoders for natural tasks. , 2009, Journal of vision.

[56]  M. L. Ashley,et al.  Concerning the Significance of Intensity of LIght in Visual Estimates of Depth. , 1898 .

[57]  Ping-Sing Tsai,et al.  Shape from Shading: A Survey , 1999, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..