The weight of time: gravitational force enhances discrimination of visual motion duration.

In contrast with the anisotropies in spatial and motion vision, anisotropies in the perception of motion duration have not been investigated to our knowledge. Here, we addressed this issue by asking observers to judge the duration of motion of a target accelerating over a fixed length path in one of different directions. Observers watched either a pictorial or a quasi-blank scene, while being upright or tilted by 45° relative to the monitor and Earth's gravity. Finally, observers were upright and we tilted the scene by 45°. We found systematic anisotropies in the precision of the responses, the performance being better for downward motion than for upward motion relative to the scene both when the observer and the scene were upright and when either the observer or the scene were tilted by 45°, although tilting decreased the size of the effect. We argue that implicit knowledge about gravity force is incorporated in the neural mechanisms computing elapsed time. Furthermore, the results suggest that the effects of a virtual gravity can be represented with respect to a vertical direction concordant with the visual scene orientation and discordant with the direction of Earth's gravity.

[1]  Roberto Arrighi,et al.  Spatiotopic selectivity of adaptation-based compression of event duration. , 2011, Journal of vision.

[2]  A. Johnston,et al.  Retinotopic adaptation-based visual duration compression. , 2010, Journal of vision.

[3]  L. Harris,et al.  How different types of scenes affect the Subjective Visual Vertical (SVV) and the Perceptual Upright (PU) , 2010, Vision Research.

[4]  Dorita H. F. Chang,et al.  Frames of reference for biological motion and face perception. , 2010, Journal of vision.

[5]  Dorita H. F. Chang,et al.  Visual sensitivity to acceleration: Effects of motion orientation, velocity, and size , 2010 .

[6]  Jessica A. Cardin,et al.  Cellular Mechanisms of Temporal Sensitivity in Visual Cortex Neurons , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[7]  O. Blanke,et al.  Gravity and observer's body orientation influence the visual perception of human body postures. , 2009, Journal of vision.

[8]  F. Lacquaniti,et al.  Visuo-motor coordination and internal models for object interception , 2009, Experimental Brain Research.

[9]  Francesco Lacquaniti,et al.  Contributions of the Human Temporoparietal Junction and MT/V5+ to the Timing of Interception Revealed by Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[10]  I. Israël,et al.  One second interval production task during post-rotatory sensation. , 2008, Journal of vestibular research : equilibrium & orientation.

[11]  F. Lacquaniti,et al.  Internal models and prediction of visual gravitational motion , 2008, Vision Research.

[12]  D. Eagleman Human time perception and its illusions , 2008, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[13]  Vincenzo Maffei,et al.  Vestibular nuclei and cerebellum put visual gravitational motion in context. , 2008, Journal of neurophysiology.

[14]  W P Medendorp,et al.  Shared computational mechanism for tilt compensation accounts for biased verticality percepts in motion and pattern vision. , 2008, Journal of neurophysiology.

[15]  G. Taga,et al.  Frame of reference for visual perception in young infants during change of body position , 2007, Experimental Brain Research.

[16]  Heinrich H. Bülthoff,et al.  A Bayesian model of the disambiguation of gravitoinertial force by visual cues , 2007, Experimental Brain Research.

[17]  Deborah Giaschi,et al.  The role of cortical area V5/MT+ in speed-tuned directional anisotropies in global motion perception , 2007, Vision Research.

[18]  Mazyar Fallah,et al.  A Motion-Dependent Distortion of Retinotopy in Area V4 , 2006, Neuron.

[19]  Francesco Lacquaniti,et al.  Anticipating the effects of gravity when intercepting moving objects: differentiating up and down based on nonvisual cues. , 2005, Journal of neurophysiology.

[20]  T. Hubbard Representational momentum and related displacements in spatial memory: A review of the findings , 2005, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[21]  P. R. Davidson,et al.  Widespread access to predictive models in the motor system: a short review , 2005, Journal of neural engineering.

[22]  D. Bradley,et al.  Structure and function of visual area MT. , 2005, Annual review of neuroscience.

[23]  F. Lacquaniti,et al.  Representation of Visual Gravitational Motion in the Human Vestibular Cortex , 2005, Science.

[24]  Dale Purves,et al.  Natural-scene geometry predicts the perception of angles and line orientation. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[25]  Edward A Essock,et al.  A horizontal bias in human visual processing of orientation and its correspondence to the structural components of natural scenes. , 2004, Journal of vision.

[26]  Laurence R Harris,et al.  Shape-from-Shading Depends on Visual, Gravitational, and Body-Orientation Cues , 2004, Perception.

[27]  Randolph Blake,et al.  Physics embedded in visual perception of three-dimensional shape from motion , 2004, Nature Neuroscience.

[28]  David M. Eagleman,et al.  Time perception is distorted during slow motion sequences in movies , 2004 .

[29]  H. Krist,et al.  When is the ball going to hit the ground? Duration estimates, eye movements, and mental imagery of object motion. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[30]  F. Lacquaniti,et al.  Internal models of target motion: expected dynamics overrides measured kinematics in timing manual interceptions. , 2004, Journal of neurophysiology.

[31]  A. Georgopoulos,et al.  Neural responses during interception of real and apparent circularly moving stimuli in motor cortex and area 7a. , 2004, Cerebral cortex.

[32]  M. Shadlen,et al.  Representation of Time by Neurons in the Posterior Parietal Cortex of the Macaque , 2003, Neuron.

[33]  Nikolaus F Troje,et al.  Reference Frames for Orientation Anisotropies in Face Recognition and Biological-Motion Perception , 2003, Perception.

[34]  Alan Agresti,et al.  Categorical Data Analysis , 2003 .

[35]  W. Friedman Arrows of Time in Infancy: The Representation of Temporal–Causal Invariances , 2002, Cognitive Psychology.

[36]  Christian Darlot,et al.  Using sensory weighting to model the influence of canal, otolith and visual cues on spatial orientation and eye movements , 2002, Biological Cybernetics.

[37]  Jeff Miller,et al.  On the analysis of psychometric functions: The Spearman-Kärber method , 2001, Perception & psychophysics.

[38]  Anne-Marie Brouwer,et al.  Perception of acceleration with short presentation times: Can acceleration be used in interception? , 2001, Perception & psychophysics.

[39]  F. Lacquaniti,et al.  Does the brain model Newton's laws? , 2001, Nature Neuroscience.

[40]  S. McKee,et al.  The use of an implicit standard for measuring discrimination thresholds , 2000, Vision Research.

[41]  J. V. Van Gisbergen,et al.  Properties of the internal representation of gravity inferred from spatial-direction and body-tilt estimates. , 2000, Journal of neurophysiology.

[42]  N. Qian,et al.  Axis-of-motion affects direction discrimination, not speed discrimination , 1999, Vision Research.

[43]  B. L. Gros,et al.  Anisotropies in visual motion perception: a fresh look. , 1998, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[44]  T. Hubbard,et al.  Environmental invariants in the representation of motion: Implied dynamics and representational momentum, gravity, friction, and centripetal force , 1995, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[45]  Jane E. Raymond,et al.  Directional anisotropy of motion sensitivity across the visual field , 1994, Vision Research.

[46]  P. Werkhoven,et al.  Visual processing of optic acceleration , 1992, Vision Research.

[47]  E S Spelke,et al.  Infants' sensitivity to effects of gravity on visible object motion. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[48]  F. Lacquaniti,et al.  The role of preparation in tuning anticipatory and reflex responses during catching , 1989, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[49]  G. Orban,et al.  Human velocity and direction discrimination measured with random dot patterns , 1988, Vision Research.

[50]  R. Sekuler,et al.  Direction-specific improvement in motion discrimination , 1987, Vision Research.

[51]  S. Appelle Perception and discrimination as a function of stimulus orientation: the "oblique effect" in man and animals. , 1972, Psychological bulletin.

[52]  F. Campbell,et al.  The effect of orientation on the visual resolution of gratings , 1966, The Journal of physiology.

[53]  Guy Orban,et al.  Processing of targets in smooth or apparent motion along the vertical in the human brain: an fMRI study. , 2010, Journal of neurophysiology.

[54]  F A Wichmann,et al.  Ning for Helpful Comments and Suggestions. This Paper Benefited Con- Siderably from Conscientious Peer Review, and We Thank Our Reviewers the Psychometric Function: I. Fitting, Sampling, and Goodness of Fit , 2001 .

[55]  Eero P. Simoncelli,et al.  Natural image statistics and neural representation. , 2001, Annual review of neuroscience.

[56]  A Semjen,et al.  Temporal control and motor control: two functional modules which may be influenced differently under microgravity. , 1998, Human movement science.

[57]  Y. Benjamini,et al.  Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing , 1995 .

[58]  George Casella,et al.  Statistical Inference , 1990 .

[59]  M K Kaiser,et al.  Visual acceleration detection: Effect of sign and motion orientation , 1989, Perception & psychophysics.

[60]  L. Kaufman,et al.  Handbook of perception and human performance , 1986 .

[61]  H. Akaike,et al.  Information Theory and an Extension of the Maximum Likelihood Principle , 1973 .