Design and Operational Elements of the Robotic Subsystem for the e.deorbit Debris Removal Mission

This paper presents a robotic capture concept that was developed as part of the e.deorbit study by ESA. The defective and tumbling satellite ENVISAT was chosen as a potential target to be captured, stabilized, and subsequently de-orbited in a controlled manner. A robotic capture concept was developed that is based on a chaser satellite equipped with a seven degrees-of-freedom dexterous robotic manipulator, holding a dedicated linear two-bracket gripper. The satellite is also equipped with a clamping mechanism for achieving a stiff fixation with the grasped target, following their combined satellite-stack de-tumbling and prior to the execution of the de-orbit maneuver. Driving elements of the robotic design, operations and control are described and analyzed. These include pre and post-capture operations, the task-specific kinematics of the manipulator, the intrinsic mechanical arm flexibility and its effect on the arm's positioning accuracy, visual tracking, as well as the interaction between the manipulator controller and that of the chaser satellite. The kinematics analysis yielded robust reachability of the grasp point. The effects of intrinsic arm flexibility turned out to be noticeable but also effectively scalable through robot joint speed adaption throughout the maneuvers. During most of the critical robot arm operations, the internal robot joint torques are shown to be within the design limits. These limits are only reached for a limiting scenario of tumbling motion of ENVISAT, consisting of an initial pure spin of 5 deg/s about its unstable intermediate axis of inertia. The computer vision performance was found to be satisfactory with respect to positioning accuracy requirements. Further developments are necessary and are being pursued to meet the stringent mission-related robustness requirements. Overall, the analyses conducted in this study showed that the capture and de-orbiting of ENVISAT using the proposed robotic concept is feasible with respect to relevant mission requirements and for most of the operational scenarios considered. Future work aims at developing a combined chaser-robot system controller. This will include a visual servo to minimize the positioning errors during the contact phases of the mission (grasping and clamping). Further validation of the visual tracking in orbital lighting conditions will be pursued.

[1]  David W. Miller,et al.  SPHERES Reconfigurable Framework and Control System Design for Autonomous Assembly , 2009 .

[2]  Máximo A. Roa,et al.  Reachability and Capability Analysis for Manipulation Tasks , 2013, ROBOT.

[3]  Giorgio Panin,et al.  Vision-based localization for on-orbit servicing of a partially cooperative satellite , 2015 .

[4]  Kazuya Yoshida Space Robot Dynamics and Control: To Orbit, From Orbit, and Future , 2000 .

[5]  Marco De Stefano,et al.  Coupled Control of Chaser Platform and Robot Arm for the e.Deorbit Mission , 2017 .

[6]  J. Liou An active debris removal parametric study for LEO environment remediation , 2011 .

[7]  Michèle Lavagna,et al.  e.Deorbit Mission: OHB Debris Removal Concepts , 2015 .

[8]  Alin Albu-Schäffer,et al.  The OOS-SIM: An on-ground simulation facility for on-orbit servicing robotic operations , 2015, 2015 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA).

[9]  Michael Osborn,et al.  Micro-Satellite Technology Experiment (MiTEx) Upper Stage Propulsion System Development , 2007 .

[10]  Felix Huber,et al.  On-Orbit Servicing Missions: Challenges and Solutions for Spacecraft Operations , 2010 .

[11]  Renuganth Varatharajoo,et al.  SPHERES interact—Human–machine interaction aboard the International Space Station , 2012, J. Field Robotics.

[12]  Alin Albu-Schäffer,et al.  DLR's robotics technologies for on-orbit servicing , 2004, Adv. Robotics.

[13]  Tamim Asfour,et al.  Robot placement based on reachability inversion , 2013, 2013 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[14]  Gerd Hirzinger,et al.  Generating feasible trajectories for autonomous on-orbit grasping of spinning debris in a useful time , 2013, 2013 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[15]  Marco De Stefano,et al.  An Energy-Based Approach for the Multi-Rate Control of a Manipulator on an Actuated Base , 2018, 2018 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA).

[16]  Ou Ma,et al.  A review of space robotics technologies for on-orbit servicing , 2014 .

[17]  R. W. Madison Micro-satellite based, on-orbit servicing work at the Air Force Research Laboratory , 2000, 2000 IEEE Aerospace Conference. Proceedings (Cat. No.00TH8484).

[18]  Y. Umetani,et al.  Continuous Path Control of Space Manipulators Mounted on OMV , 1987 .

[19]  Mikel Sagardia,et al.  Robotic Capture and De-Orbit of a Heavy, Uncooperative and Tumbling Target in Low Earth Orbit , 2015 .

[20]  Thomas M. Davis,et al.  XSS-10 microsatellite flight demonstration program results , 2004, SPIE Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[21]  Giorgio Panin,et al.  Model-based Visual Tracking: The OpenTL Framework , 2011 .

[22]  Kazuya Yoshida,et al.  Engineering Test Satellite VII Flight Experiments for Space Robot Dynamics and Control: Theories on Laboratory Test Beds Ten Years Ago, Now in Orbit , 2003, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[23]  James Shoemaker,et al.  Orbital express space operations architecture program , 2004, SPIE Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[24]  Clemens Kaiser,et al.  VIBANASS Test Results and Impacts On Kayser-Threde Active Debris Removal Strategy , 2013 .

[25]  Raja Mukherji,et al.  Special Purpose Dexterous Manipulator (SPDM) Advanced Control Features and Development Test Results , 2001 .

[26]  R. O. Ambrose,et al.  Robonaut 2 — Initial activities on-board the ISS , 2012, 2012 IEEE Aerospace Conference.

[27]  J.J. Biesiadecki,et al.  The Mars Exploration Rover surface mobility flight software driving ambition , 2006, 2006 IEEE Aerospace Conference.

[28]  B. Aikenhead,et al.  Canadarm and the space shuttle , 1983 .

[29]  Alin Albu-Schäffer,et al.  DLR's torque-controlled light weight robot III-are we reaching the technological limits now? , 2002, Proceedings 2002 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (Cat. No.02CH37292).

[30]  Gerd Hirzinger,et al.  Sensor-based space robotics-ROTEX and its telerobotic features , 1993, IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom..

[31]  Ella M. Atkins,et al.  The Ranger Robotic Satellite Servicer and Its Autonomous Software-Based Safety System , 2004, IEEE Intell. Syst..

[32]  Daniel Leidner,et al.  Exploiting structure in two-armed manipulation tasks for humanoid robots , 2010, 2010 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[33]  Marco De Stefano,et al.  GNC Architecture for the e.Deorbit Mission , 2017 .

[34]  T. Matsueda,et al.  JEMRMS system design and development status , 1991, NTC '91 - National Telesystems Conference Proceedings.

[35]  H. Werstiuk,et al.  The role of the mobile servicing system on space station , 1987, Proceedings. 1987 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[36]  Roberto Lampariello,et al.  Velocity matching compliant control for a space robot during capture of a free-floating target , 2018, 2018 IEEE Aerospace Conference.

[37]  Kenji Nagaoka,et al.  Impedance-based contact control of a free-flying space robot with a compliant wrist for non-cooperative satellite capture , 2012, 2012 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[38]  Alin Albu-Schäffer,et al.  ROKVISS - robotics component verification on ISS current experimental results on parameter identification , 2006, Proceedings 2006 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2006. ICRA 2006..

[39]  Richard T. Howard,et al.  Advanced Video Guidance Sensor (AVGS) development testing , 2004, SPIE Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[40]  Sarah Greaves,et al.  Orbiter Boom Sensor System and Shuttle Return to Flight: Operations Analyses , 2005 .

[41]  Mitsushige Oda,et al.  ETS-VII, space robot in-orbit experiment satellite , 1996, Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[42]  Alessandro Massimo Giordano,et al.  On-ground experimental verification of a torque controlled free-floating robot , 2015 .