Increasing population size can inhibit cumulative cultural evolution

Significance Cumulative cultural evolution (CCE)—the social-learning process through which adaptive modifications accumulate over historical time—is crucial to the advancement of the human species, and yet little is known about the factors important to CCE. Larger populations may enhance CCE, although this is contentious. We report a large-scale experiment that manipulates population size and tests its effect on artefact performance using a paper plane construction task. Over the experimental generations, smaller populations showed the strongest improvements in plane performance (indexed by flight distance). We conclude that larger populations do not enhance artefact performance via CCE and that it may be only under certain specific conditions that larger population sizes enhance CCE. The extent to which larger populations enhance cumulative cultural evolution (CCE) is contentious. We report a large-scale experiment (n = 543) that investigates the CCE of technology (paper planes and their flight distances) using a transmission-chain design. Population size was manipulated such that participants could learn from the paper planes constructed by one, two, or four models from the prior generation. These social-learning conditions were compared with an asocial individual-learning condition in which individual participants made repeated attempts at constructing a paper plane, without having access to any planes produced by other participants. Larger populations generated greater variation in plane performance and gave participants access to better-adapted planes, but this did not enhance CCE. In fact, there was an inverse relationship between population size and CCE: plane flight distance did not improve over the experimental generations in the 2-Model and 4-Model conditions, but did improve over generations in the 1-Model social-learning condition. The incremental improvement in plane flight distance in the 1-Model social-learning condition was comparable to that in the Individual Learning condition, highlighting the importance of trial-and-error learning to artifact innovation and adaptation. An exploratory analysis indicated that the greater variation participants had access to in the larger populations may have overwhelmed their working memory and weakened their ability to selectively copy the best-adapted plane(s). We conclude that larger populations do not enhance artifact performance via CCE, and that it may be only under certain specific conditions that larger population sizes enhance CCE.

[1]  William M. Fields,et al.  The Cultural Origins of Human Cognition. , 2000 .

[2]  Luke Rendell,et al.  Social Learning Strategies: Bridge-Building between Fields , 2018, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[3]  Christine A Caldwell,et al.  Social Learning Mechanisms and Cumulative Cultural Evolution , 2009, Psychological science.

[4]  N. Charness,et al.  Expert Performance Its Structure and Acquisition , 2002 .

[5]  A. Ingham,et al.  The Ringelmann effect: Studies of group size and group performance , 1974 .

[6]  M. Tomasello The Cultural Origins of Human Cognition , 2000 .

[7]  Robert Boyd,et al.  Partial connectivity increases cultural accumulation within groups , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[8]  J. Henrich,et al.  Innovation in the collective brain , 2016, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[9]  N. Kerr,et al.  Group performance and decision making. , 2004, Annual review of psychology.

[10]  W. Dixon,et al.  Efficient analysis of experimental observations. , 1980, Annual review of pharmacology and toxicology.

[11]  Alex Thornton,et al.  What is cumulative cultural evolution? , 2018, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[12]  T. M. Ellison,et al.  The sky is falling: evidence of a negativity bias in the social transmission of information , 2017 .

[13]  Michael Muthukrishna,et al.  Sociality influences cultural complexity , 2014, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[14]  Alberto Acerbi,et al.  Cultural complexity and demography: The case of folktales , 2017 .

[15]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[16]  K. Vaesen,et al.  The empirical case against the ‘demographic turn’ in Palaeolithic archaeology , 2016, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[17]  Simon Garrod,et al.  The Interactive Evolution of Human Communication Systems , 2010, Cogn. Sci..

[18]  C. Caldwell,et al.  Experimental models for testing hypotheses about cumulative cultural evolution , 2008 .

[19]  Andy P. Field,et al.  Discovering Statistics Using SPSS , 2000 .

[20]  Yoshihisa Kashima,et al.  Maintaining Cultural Stereotypes in the Serial Reproduction of Narratives , 2000 .

[21]  Shane L. Rogers,et al.  Stick or Switch: A Selection Heuristic Predicts when People Take the Perspective of Others or Communicate Egocentrically , 2016, PloS one.

[22]  Helena Miton,et al.  Cumulative culture in the laboratory: methodological and theoretical challenges , 2018, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[23]  T. Mark Ellison,et al.  The Cultural Evolution of Human Communication Systems in Different Sized Populations: Usability Trumps Learnability , 2013, PloS one.

[24]  Hae-Young Kim Statistical notes for clinical researchers: assessing normal distribution (2) using skewness and kurtosis , 2013, Restorative dentistry & endodontics.

[25]  H. J. Arnold Introduction to the Practice of Statistics , 1990 .

[26]  Alex Mesoudi,et al.  Variable Cultural Acquisition Costs Constrain Cumulative Cultural Evolution , 2011, PloS one.

[27]  Simon Garrod,et al.  Applying the cultural ratchet to a social artefact: The cumulative cultural evolution of a language game , 2018, Evolution and Human Behavior.

[28]  Adam Powell,et al.  Late Pleistocene Demography and the Appearance of Modern Human Behavior , 2009, Science.

[29]  Alex Mesoudi,et al.  An experimental demonstration of the effect of group size on cultural accumulation , 2014 .

[30]  T. M. Ellison,et al.  Cultural selection drives the evolution of human communication systems , 2014, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[31]  Michael Muthukrishna,et al.  Understanding cumulative cultural evolution , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[32]  Andrea Baronchelli,et al.  The spontaneous emergence of conventions: An experimental study of cultural evolution , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[33]  David Lindley,et al.  Introduction to the Practice of Statistics , 1990, The Mathematical Gazette.

[34]  Simon Garrod,et al.  The fitness and functionality of culturally evolved communication systems , 2008, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[35]  R. Boyd,et al.  The foundations of the human cultural niche , 2015, Nature Communications.

[36]  K. Vaesen,et al.  Population size does not explain past changes in cultural complexity , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[37]  付伶俐 打磨Using Language,倡导新理念 , 2014 .

[38]  G. W. Hill Group versus individual performance: are n + 1 heads better than one?" psychological bulletin , 1982 .

[39]  J. Henrich Demography and Cultural Evolution: How Adaptive Cultural Processes Can Produce Maladaptive Losses—The Tasmanian Case , 2004, American Antiquity.

[40]  Lydia M. Hopper,et al.  Observational learning of tool use in children: Investigating cultural spread through diffusion chains and learning mechanisms through ghost displays. , 2010, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[41]  N. Cowan,et al.  The Magical Mystery Four , 2010, Current directions in psychological science.

[42]  Reply to Henrich et al.: The Tasmanian effect and other red herrings , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[43]  D. Lindley Introduction to the Practice of Statistics , 1990, Mathematical Gazette.

[44]  K. Laland,et al.  Experimental Evidence for the Co-Evolution of Hominin Tool-Making Teaching and Language , 2014, Nature Communications.

[45]  C. Caldwell,et al.  Human cumulative culture in the laboratory: Effects of (micro) population size , 2010, Learning & behavior.

[46]  Karl H. Schlag,et al.  Which One Should I Imitate , 1999 .

[47]  N. Cowan The magical number 4 in short-term memory: A reconsideration of mental storage capacity , 2001, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[48]  Maxime Derex,et al.  Experimental evidence for the influence of group size on cultural complexity , 2013, Nature.

[49]  K. Schlag Why Imitate, and If So, How?, : A Boundedly Rational Approach to Multi-armed Bandits , 1998 .

[50]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  ELECTRONIC BRAINSTORMING AND GROUP SIZE , 1992 .

[51]  I. Steiner Group process and productivity , 1972 .

[52]  G. Lupyan,et al.  Language Structure Is Partly Determined by Social Structure , 2010, PloS one.