Suppose that a seller and a buyer have private valuations for a good, and that their respective utilities from a trading mechanism are given by us and ub. (These utilities are determined by the valuation for the good, by whether a trade occurs, and by the price which is paid.) Consider the problem of maximizing E[λus + (1 − λ)ub] for some weight λ in the unit interval. It is shown in this article that, if λ is sufficiently close to zero or one, then the maximum value of this objective function attainable by a static revelation mechanism can be arbitrarily closely approximated by equilibria of the sequential bargaining games in which only a single player makes offers. That is, the welfare bound implied by the revelation principle is virtually attainable in offer/counteroffer bargaining. The main condition needed for this result is a monotone-hazard-rate assumption about the distribution of types. A class of examples is presented in which the result holds for all λ (i.e. the entire ex ante Pareto frontier).
[1]
A. Rubinstein.
Perfect Equilibrium in a Bargaining Model
,
1982
.
[2]
M. Satterthwaite,et al.
Efficient Mechanisms for Bilateral Trading
,
1983
.
[3]
D. Fudenberg,et al.
Infinite-Horizon Models of Bargaining with One-Sided Incomplete Information
,
1985
.
[4]
Peter Cramton,et al.
Sequential Bargaining Mechanisms
,
1985
.
[5]
Robert B. Wilson,et al.
Foundations of Dynamic Monopoly and the Coase Conjecture
,
1986
.
[6]
Steven R. Williams.
Efficient performance in two agent bargaining
,
1987
.
[7]
Lawrence M. Ausubel,et al.
Stationary Sequential Equilibria in Bargaining With Two-Sided Incomplete Information
,
1988
.
[8]
Faruk Gul,et al.
On Delay in Bargaining with One-Sided Uncertainty
,
1988
.
[9]
Lawrence M. Ausubel,et al.
REPUTATION IN BARGAINING AND DURABLE GOODS MONOPOLY
,
1989
.