Evaluating critical success factors for implementing smart devices in the construction industry

Purpose The decentralisation of information and high rate of mobile content access in the construction industry provides an ideal scenario for improvement of processes via the implementation of the paradigm of the Internet of Things (IoT). Smart devices are considered as the objects interconnected in the IoT; therefore, they play a fundamental role in the implementation of digital solutions during the execution of construction projects. The purpose of this paper is to assess the critical factors for a successful implementation of smart devices in the construction industry. Design/methodology/approach An empirical study was performed in the Dominican Republic. This country, located at the heart of the Caribbean, presents an economy that strongly relies on the construction industry. Following a systematic approach, a qualitative data collection and analysis was performed based on semi-structured interviews and content analysis to professionals of construction companies in the Dominican Republic, enquiring the concept of smart devices and critical success factors for implementing the devices in the industry. Findings The key success factors obtained from the contestants were leadership, technology awareness, company size, usability of proposed solution, cost of implementation and interoperability. Originality/value This paper provides information to clients of the construction sector regarding the benefits of embedding smart devices into their business activities. Furthermore, this study provides a better understanding of the key factors to be considered by construction organisations when embedding smart devices into their projects. This study also provides recommendations for distinct stakeholders of the construction sector, such as policy makers, clients and technology consultants. Policy makers should especially consider factors such as technology awareness and leadership to develop the right policies for the integration of the IoT in construction projects. Technology consultants should be aware of the latest case studies of successful implementation of smart devices and IoT systems in the world in order to adapt and implement smart devices and IoT in their projects.

[1]  Piller,et al.  Business Model Innovation for Industrie 4.0: Why the 'Industrial Internet' Mandates a New Perspective on Innovation , 2015 .

[2]  Yves Ducq,et al.  Organisational interoperability characterisation and evaluation using enterprise modelling and graph theory , 2018, Comput. Ind..

[3]  Suresh Renukappa,et al.  What is a smart device? - a conceptualisation within the paradigm of the internet of things , 2018 .

[4]  Xiangyu Wang,et al.  An explanatory case study on cloud computing applications in the built environment , 2014 .

[5]  Geoffrey Qiping Shen,et al.  An Internet of Things-enabled BIM platform for on-site assembly services in prefabricated construction , 2018 .

[6]  Siniša Husnjak,et al.  Possibilities of using Speech Recognition Systems of Smart Terminal Devices in Traffic Environment , 2014 .

[7]  Javier Irizarry,et al.  Integrating BIM and GIS to improve the visual monitoring of construction supply chain management , 2013 .

[8]  Mani Golparvar-Fard,et al.  Research in Visualization Techniques for Field Construction , 2011 .

[9]  Mahesh Pal,et al.  Construction schedule review in GIS with a navigable 3D animation of project activities , 2009 .

[10]  Nam K Tran,et al.  Development of novel smart device based application for serial wound imaging and management. , 2013, Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries.

[11]  Ikujiro Nonaka,et al.  A THEORY OF ORGANIZATIONAL KNOWLEDGE CREATION , 2014 .

[12]  Subashini Suresh,et al.  Mobile Computing in the Construction Industry: Main Challenges and Solutions , 2017 .

[13]  Xiangyu Wang,et al.  Optimizing lift operations and vessel transport schedules for disassembly of multiple offshore platforms using BIM and GIS , 2018, Automation in Construction.

[14]  Richard Joiner,et al.  Constantly connected - The effects of smart-devices on mental health , 2014, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[15]  Zhihan Lv,et al.  Extending touch-less interaction on vision based wearable device , 2015, 2015 IEEE Virtual Reality (VR).

[16]  J. Grimshaw,et al.  What is an adequate sample size? Operationalising data saturation for theory-based interview studies , 2010, Psychology & health.

[17]  Anuradha Mathrani,et al.  The Perceived Benefits of Apps by Construction Professionals in New Zealand , 2017 .

[18]  寺口 季,et al.  John W. Creswell, "Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design : Choosing Among Five Approaches.", SAGE, 2013 , 2017 .

[19]  Marilyn Domas White,et al.  Content Analysis: A Flexible Methodology , 2006, Libr. Trends.

[20]  Iliya Markov,et al.  Risk perception and risk management in cloud computing: Results from a case study of Swiss companies , 2013, Int. J. Inf. Manag..

[21]  V. K. Bansal Potential of GIS to Find Solutions to Space Related Problems in Construction Industry , 2007 .

[22]  Kire Trivodaliev,et al.  A review of Internet of Things for smart home: Challenges and solutions , 2017 .

[23]  Xiangyu Wang,et al.  Research trends and opportunities of augmented reality applications in architecture, engineering, and construction , 2013 .

[24]  Vijay Sivaraman,et al.  Smart IoT Devices in the Home: Security and Privacy Implications , 2018, IEEE Technology and Society Magazine.

[25]  Naihua Duan,et al.  Purposeful Sampling for Qualitative Data Collection and Analysis in Mixed Method Implementation Research , 2015, Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research.

[26]  A. Mills,et al.  Measuring the occupational health and safety performance of construction companies in Australia , 2001 .