Knowledge Adquisition in a Cooperative and Competitive Framework

There are several literature references which deal with interchange of tangible goods (see e.g. López, Núñez, Rodríguez, & Rubio, 2002). However, when the nature of interchangeable goods is more complex, such as knowledge, some considerations must be taken into account. In case of information " interchange " , it is compulsory to consider that to supply it does not imply that the initial owner losses it. This is radically different from the treatment of physical resources, since when, for instance, a person exchange a horse for a car, she has not got the horse any more. This difference , which seems simple at first sight, entails great and radical changes when dealing with interchange systems where the changeable goods may include knowledge. When tackling interchange systems, a crucial point is the process that leads users to make their ABSTRACT In this chapter, we modelize an interchange commerce system basen on the economic concept of utility function. A cognitive agent controls the interchanges of the clients in her market. When interchanges are not possible any more, the agent becomes a client of a higher market, giving place to a hierarchical market system. Now, she behaves according to what she has learned from her clients. Apart from physical resources, intangible goods such as knowledge are also interchanged. This cooperative and competitive structure is formalized via process algebra.

[1]  Hong Lin,et al.  Designing Multiagent-Based Education Systems for Navigation Training , 2006, 2006 5th IEEE International Conference on Cognitive Informatics.

[2]  Kenji Sugawara,et al.  Interactive Design Method of Agent System for Symbiotic Computing , 2007, 6th IEEE International Conference on Cognitive Informatics.

[3]  Catholijn M. Jonker,et al.  Modeling User Preferences and Mediating Agents in Electronic Commerce , 2001, AgentLink.

[4]  Ke-Jia Chen,et al.  Giving Personal Assistant Agents a Case-Based Memory , 2010, Int. J. Cogn. Informatics Nat. Intell..

[5]  Wynn C. Stirling,et al.  Satisficing Equilibria: A Non-Classical Theory of Games and Decisions , 2002, Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems.

[6]  Lars Rasmusson,et al.  Agents, self-interest and electronic markets , 1999, The Knowledge Engineering Review.

[7]  Ismael Rodríguez,et al.  Testing Entities in a Parallel Cognitive Language , 2006, 2006 5th IEEE International Conference on Cognitive Informatics.

[8]  Yingxu Wang,et al.  On Laws of Work Organization in Human Cooperation , 2007, Int. J. Cogn. Informatics Nat. Intell..

[9]  Andrew Targowski Cognitive Informatics and Wisdom Development: Interdisciplinary Approaches , 2010 .

[10]  Jon Doyle,et al.  Utility Functions for Ceteris Paribus Preferences , 2004, Comput. Intell..

[11]  Leon van der Torre,et al.  Utilitarian Desires , 2002, Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems.

[12]  Roderic A. Girle,et al.  Methodological Issues for the Logic of Questions and Commands , 2012, Int. J. Cogn. Informatics Nat. Intell..

[13]  Sarit Kraus,et al.  Negotiation and Cooperation in Multi-Agent Environments , 1997, Artif. Intell..

[14]  Moshe Tennenholtz,et al.  Game Theory and Artificial Intelligence , 2002, Foundations and Applications of Multi-Agent Systems.

[15]  Yingxu Wang,et al.  Formal Modeling and Specification of Design Patterns Using RTPA , 2008, Int. J. Cogn. Informatics Nat. Intell..

[16]  Torsten Eymann Markets without Makers - A Framework for Decentralized Economic Coordination in Multiagent Systems , 2001, WELCOM.

[17]  Michael Wooldridge,et al.  Game Theory and Decision Theory in Multi-Agent Systems , 2002, Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems.

[18]  Ismael Rodríguez,et al.  Testing learning strategies , 2005, Fourth IEEE Conference on Cognitive Informatics, 2005. (ICCI 2005)..

[19]  Gordon D. Plotkin,et al.  A structural approach to operational semantics , 2004, J. Log. Algebraic Methods Program..

[20]  Phyllis Chiasson,et al.  Relational Thinking Styles and Natural Intelligence: Assessing Inference Patterns for Computational Modeling , 2012 .

[21]  Tuomas Sandholm Agents in Electronic Commerce: Component Technologies for Automated Negation and Coalition Formation , 1998, CIA.

[22]  Yingxu Wang,et al.  The Cognitive Process of Decision Making , 2007, Int. J. Cogn. Informatics Nat. Intell..

[23]  Phan Cong-Vinh Categorical Approaches to Models and Behaviors of Autonomic Agent Systems , 2009 .

[24]  Junsheng Zhang,et al.  Semantically Linking Information Resources for Web-Based Sharing , 2013, Int. J. Cogn. Informatics Nat. Intell..

[25]  Jeroen Keppens,et al.  A Calculus of Partially Ordered Preferences for Compositional Modelling and Configuration , 2002 .