Communicating intent to develop shared situation awareness and engender trust in human-agent teams

Abstract This paper addresses issues related to integrating autonomy-enabled, intelligent agents into collaborative, human-machine teams. Interaction with intelligent machine agents capable of making independent, goal-directed decisions in human-machine teaming operations constitutes a major change from traditional human-machine interaction involving teleoperation. Communicating the machine agent’s intent to human counterparts becomes increasingly important as independent machine decisions become subject to human trust and mental models. The authors present findings from their research that suggest existing user display technologies, tailored with context-specific information and the human’s knowledge level of the machine agent’s decision process, can mitigate misperceptions of the appropriateness of agent behavioral responses. This is important because misperceptions on the part of human team members increases the likelihood of trust degradation and unnecessary interventions, ultimately leading to disuse of the agent. Examples of possible issues associated with communicating agent intent, as well as potential implications for trust calibration are provided.

[1]  Florian Jentsch,et al.  Cognitive Models of Decision Making Processes for Human-Robot Interaction , 2013, HCI.

[2]  Muhammad Awais,et al.  Human-Robot Interaction in an Unknown Human Intention Scenario , 2013, 2013 11th International Conference on Frontiers of Information Technology.

[3]  Niels van Berkel,et al.  The influence of approach speed and functional noise on users' perception of a robot , 2013, 2013 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[4]  Paul Nielsen,et al.  Defense Science Board Summer Study on Autonomy , 2016 .

[5]  B. Scassellati,et al.  Challenges in Shared-Environment Human-Robot Collaboration , 2013 .

[6]  Sebastian Thrun,et al.  Toward a Framework for Human-Robot Interaction , 2004, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[7]  Michael A. Goodrich,et al.  Validating human-robot interaction schemes in multitasking environments , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics - Part A: Systems and Humans.

[8]  Michael A. Rupp,et al.  Intelligent Agent Transparency in Human–Agent Teaming for Multi-UxV Management , 2016, Hum. Factors.

[9]  Duncan W. Haldane,et al.  Performance analysis and terrain classification for a legged robot over rough terrain , 2012, 2012 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[10]  Michael A. Goodrich,et al.  Seven principles of efficient human robot interaction , 2003, SMC'03 Conference Proceedings. 2003 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics. Conference Theme - System Security and Assurance (Cat. No.03CH37483).

[11]  Mica R. Endsley,et al.  Toward a Theory of Situation Awareness in Dynamic Systems , 1995, Hum. Factors.

[12]  Daniel Polani,et al.  Towards socially adaptive robots: A novel method for real time recognition of human-robot interaction styles , 2008, Humanoids 2008 - 8th IEEE-RAS International Conference on Humanoid Robots.

[13]  Thomas Hellström,et al.  On the moral responsibility of military robots , 2013, Ethics and Information Technology.

[14]  Kristin E. Schaefer,et al.  Will passengers trust driverless vehicles? Removing the steering wheel and pedals , 2016, 2016 IEEE International Multi-Disciplinary Conference on Cognitive Methods in Situation Awareness and Decision Support (CogSIMA).

[15]  Daniel Barber,et al.  Defining next-generation multi-modal communication in human robot interaction: (578902012-095) , 2011 .

[16]  Cristiano Castelfranchi,et al.  Guarantees for Autonomy in Cognitive Agent Architecture , 1995, ECAI Workshop on Agent Theories, Architectures, and Languages.

[17]  Ewart de Visser,et al.  Measurement of trust in human-robot collaboration , 2007, 2007 International Symposium on Collaborative Technologies and Systems.

[18]  John D. Lee,et al.  Trust, self-confidence, and operators' adaptation to automation , 1994, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[19]  Joseph B. Lyons,et al.  Human–Human Reliance in the Context of Automation , 2012, Hum. Factors.

[20]  John D. Lee,et al.  Trust in Automation: Designing for Appropriate Reliance , 2004 .

[21]  Jessie Y.C. Chen,et al.  Effects of imperfect automation and individual differences on concurrent performance of military and robotics tasks in a simulated multitasking environment , 2009, Ergonomics.

[22]  Edward Straub The Impact of Autonomy-Enabled Vehicles and System Controls on Non-Users in Semi-Controlled Environments , 2015 .

[23]  David B. Kaber,et al.  Team situation awareness for process control safety and performance , 1998 .

[24]  Florian Jentsch,et al.  Determinants of system transparency and its influence on trust in and reliance on unmanned robotic systems , 2014, Defense + Security Symposium.

[25]  Kristin E. Schaefer,et al.  Relinquishing Manual Control: Collaboration Requires the Capability to Understand Robot Intent , 2016, 2016 International Conference on Collaboration Technologies and Systems (CTS).

[26]  Stephen M. Fiore,et al.  Effects of Robot Gaze and Proxemic Behavior on Perceived Social Presence during a Hallway Navigation Scenario , 2013 .

[27]  William Evans. Investigating the Usefulness of Operator Aids for Autonomous Unmanned Ground Vehicles Performing Reconnaissance Tasks , 2013 .

[28]  Sebastian Thrun,et al.  Spontaneous, short-term interaction with mobile robots , 1999, Proceedings 1999 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (Cat. No.99CH36288C).

[29]  Andrea Klug,et al.  Understanding Social Networks Theories Concepts And Findings , 2016 .

[30]  Joseph P. Simmons,et al.  Understanding Algorithm Aversion: Forecasters Erroneously Avoid Algorithms After Seeing them Err , 2014 .

[31]  Jessie Y. C. Chen,et al.  Human–Agent Teaming for Multirobot Control: A Review of Human Factors Issues , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems.

[32]  Kristin E. Schaefer,et al.  Individual Differences, Trust, and Vehicle Autonomy , 2015 .

[33]  Peter A. Hancock,et al.  Trust in Unmanned Aerial Systems: A Synthetic, Distributed Trust Model , 2011 .

[34]  Kaoru Hirota,et al.  Abstract—An intent expression system using eye robots is proposed for a mascot robot system from a viewpoint of humatronics. The eye robot aims at providing a basic interface method for an information , 2007 .

[35]  Cynthia Breazeal,et al.  Recognition of Affective Communicative Intent in Robot-Directed Speech , 2002, Auton. Robots.

[36]  Norman I. Badler,et al.  Defining Next-Generation Multi-Modal Communication in Human Robot Interaction , 2011 .

[37]  Terrence Fong,et al.  Advanced Interfaces for Vehicle Teleoperation: Collaborative Control, Sensor Fusion Displays, and Web-based Tools , 2000 .

[38]  Florian Jentsch,et al.  From Tools to Teammates , 2011 .

[39]  James L. Szalma,et al.  A Meta-Analysis of Factors Influencing the Development of Trust in Automation: Implications for Human-Robot Interaction , 2014 .

[40]  E. Salas,et al.  Shared mental models in expert team decision making. , 1993 .

[41]  Karon E. MacLean,et al.  The Role of Affective Touch in Human-Robot Interaction: Human Intent and Expectations in Touching the Haptic Creature , 2012, Int. J. Soc. Robotics.

[42]  Mica R. Endsley,et al.  Design and Evaluation for Situation Awareness Enhancement , 1988 .

[43]  E. Salas,et al.  Toward an understanding of team performance and training. , 1992 .

[44]  Siddhartha S. Srinivasa,et al.  Learning the communication of intent prior to physical collaboration , 2012, 2012 IEEE RO-MAN: The 21st IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication.

[45]  James L. Szalma,et al.  A Meta-Analysis of Factors Influencing the Development of Trust in Automation , 2016, Hum. Factors.

[46]  Travis J. Wiltshire,et al.  Toward understanding social cues and signals in human–robot interaction: effects of robot gaze and proxemic behavior , 2013, Front. Psychol..

[47]  Andrea L. Thomaz,et al.  Anticipation in Robot Motion , 2011 .

[48]  I. Ajzen The theory of planned behavior , 1991 .

[49]  Kristin E. Schaefer,et al.  The Perception And Measurement Of Human-robot Trust , 2013 .

[50]  Gita Sukthankar,et al.  Literature Review of Teamwork Models , 2006 .

[51]  Matt Richtel,et al.  Google’s Driverless Cars Run into Problem: Cars with Drivers , 2015 .

[52]  Howie Choset,et al.  Design and architecture of the unified modular snake robot , 2012, 2012 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[53]  Marius S. Vassiliou,et al.  Practical Considerations for Use of Mobile Apps at the Tactical Edge , 2014 .

[54]  Matthias Scheutz,et al.  First steps toward natural human-like HRI , 2007, Auton. Robots.

[55]  Kerstin Dautenhahn,et al.  Hey! There is someone at your door. A hearing robot using visual communication signals of hearing dogs to communicate intent , 2013, 2013 IEEE Symposium on Artificial Life (ALife).

[56]  Bilge Mutlu,et al.  Communication of Intent in Assistive Free Flyers , 2014, 2014 9th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[57]  Jessie Y. C. Chen,et al.  Human Performance Issues and User Interface Design for Teleoperated Robots , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C (Applications and Reviews).

[58]  Jenay M. Beer,et al.  Toward a framework for levels of robot autonomy in human-robot interaction , 2014, Journal of human-robot interaction.

[59]  Jean Scholtz,et al.  Theory and evaluation of human robot interactions , 2003, 36th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2003. Proceedings of the.

[60]  Jessie Y. C. Chen,et al.  Situation awareness-based agent transparency and human-autonomy teaming effectiveness , 2018 .

[61]  Mark R. Cutkosky,et al.  Integrated Ground Reaction Force Sensing and Terrain Classification for Small Legged Robots , 2016, IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters.

[62]  Judee K. Burgoon,et al.  Application of Expectancy Violations Theory to communication with and judgments about embodied agents during a decision-making task , 2016, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[63]  Jessie Y. C. Chen,et al.  Intelligent Agent Transparency , 2016 .

[64]  Terrence Fong,et al.  Advanced Interfaces for Vehicle Teleoperation: Collaborative Control, Sensor Fusion Displays, and Remote Driving Tools , 2001, Auton. Robots.

[65]  Edward Mottern,et al.  Moving Technology Forward by Putting Robots to Work on Military Installations: Autonomous Warrior Transport On‐base (AWTO) , 2016 .

[66]  Charles A. DiBerardino,et al.  Robotic collaborative technology alliance: an open architecture approach to integrated research , 2014, Defense + Security Symposium.

[67]  Thomas B. Sheridan,et al.  Telerobotics, Automation, and Human Supervisory Control , 2003 .

[68]  Roland Siegwart,et al.  Navigation planning for legged robots in challenging terrain , 2016, IROS 2016.

[69]  M. Cummings Management of Multiple Dynamic Human Supervisory Control Tasks for UAVs , 2005 .

[70]  Fredrik Rehnmark,et al.  Robonaut: NASA's Space Humanoid , 2000, IEEE Intell. Syst..

[71]  Jessie Y. C. Chen,et al.  Agent Transparency and the Autonomous Squad Member , 2016 .