A simple model accounts for the response of disparity-tuned V1 neurons to anticorrelated images

Disparity-tuned cells in primary visual cortex (V1) are thought to play a significant role in the processing of stereoscopic depth. The disparity-specific responses of these neurons have been previously described by an energy model based on local, feedforward interactions. This model fails to predict the response to binocularly anticorrelated stimuli, in which images presented to left and right eyes have opposite contrasts. The original energy model predicts that anticorrelation should invert the disparity tuning curve (phase difference π), with no change in the amplitude of the response. Experimentally, the amplitude tends to be reduced with anticorrelated stimuli and a spread of phase differences is observed, although phase differences near π are the most common. These experimental observations could potentially reflect a modulation of the V1 signals by feedback from higher visual areas (because anticorrelated stimuli create a weaker or nonexistent stereoscopic depth sensation). This hypothesis could explain the effects on amplitude, but the spread of phase differences is harder to understand. Here, we demonstrate that changes in both amplitude and phase can be explained by a straightforward modification of the energy model that involves only local processing. Input from each eye is passed through a monocular simple cell, incorporating a threshold, before being combined at a binocular simple cell that feeds into the energy computation. Since this local feedforward model can explain the responses of complex cells to both correlated and anticorrelated stimuli, there is no need to invoke any influence of global stereoscopic matching.

[1]  B. G. Cumming,et al.  Responses of primary visual cortical neurons to binocular disparity without depth perception , 1997, Nature.

[2]  Andrew J. Parker,et al.  Local Disparity Not Perceived Depth Is Signaled by Binocular Neurons in Cortical Area V1 of the Macaque , 2000, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[3]  I. Ohzawa,et al.  Neural mechanisms for processing binocular information II. Complex cells. , 1999, Journal of neurophysiology.

[4]  Ning Qian,et al.  Physiological computation of binocular disparity , 1997, Vision Research.

[5]  I. Ohzawa,et al.  The binocular organization of simple cells in the cat's visual cortex. , 1986, Journal of neurophysiology.

[6]  I. Ohzawa,et al.  Neural mechanisms for encoding binocular disparity: receptive field position versus phase. , 1999, Journal of neurophysiology.

[7]  Izumi Ohzawa,et al.  Mechanisms of stereoscopic vision: the disparity energy model , 1998, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[8]  D. Hubel,et al.  Receptive fields, binocular interaction and functional architecture in the cat's visual cortex , 1962, The Journal of physiology.

[9]  E H Adelson,et al.  Spatiotemporal energy models for the perception of motion. , 1985, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[10]  I. Ohzawa,et al.  Stereoscopic depth discrimination in the visual cortex: neurons ideally suited as disparity detectors. , 1990, Science.

[11]  T. Poggio,et al.  The analysis of stereopsis. , 1984, Annual review of neuroscience.

[12]  Colin Blakemore,et al.  Probing the human stereoscopic system with reverse correlation , 1999, Nature.

[13]  H. Wagner,et al.  Horizontal-disparity tuning of neurons in the visual forebrain of the behaving barn owl. , 2000, Journal of neurophysiology.

[14]  I. Ohzawa,et al.  Neural mechanisms for processing binocular information I. Simple cells. , 1999, Journal of neurophysiology.

[15]  B. Julesz Foundations of Cyclopean Perception , 1971 .

[16]  Richard A Eagle,et al.  Reversed stereo depth and motion direction with anti-correlated stimuli , 2000, Vision Research.

[17]  G. Poggio,et al.  Binocular interaction and depth sensitivity in striate and prestriate cortex of behaving rhesus monkey. , 1977, Journal of neurophysiology.

[18]  R Blake,et al.  Binocular Disparity Processing with Opposite-Contrast Stimuli , 1995, Perception.

[19]  D Marr,et al.  A computational theory of human stereo vision. , 1979, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[20]  G C DeAngelis,et al.  The physiology of stereopsis. , 2001, Annual review of neuroscience.

[21]  Parvati Dev,et al.  Perception of Depth Surfaces in Random-Dot Stereograms: A Neural Model , 1975, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..

[22]  A. Parker,et al.  Quantitative analysis of the responses of V1 neurons to horizontal disparity in dynamic random-dot stereograms. , 2002, Journal of neurophysiology.

[23]  C. Blakemore,et al.  The neural mechanism of binocular depth discrimination , 1967, The Journal of physiology.

[24]  J. Movshon,et al.  Spatial summation in the receptive fields of simple cells in the cat's striate cortex. , 1978, The Journal of physiology.

[25]  H. Wagner,et al.  A threshold explains modulation of neural responses to opposite-contrast stereograms , 2001, Neuroreport.

[26]  Ning Qian,et al.  Binocular Receptive Field Models, Disparity Tuning, and Characteristic Disparity , 1996, Neural Computation.

[27]  B G Cumming,et al.  Disparity Detection in Anticorrelated Stereograms , 1998, Perception.

[28]  A J Parker,et al.  Binocular disparity processing with opposite-contrast stimuli. , 1995 .

[29]  David J. Fleet,et al.  Neural encoding of binocular disparity: Energy models, position shifts and phase shifts , 1996, Vision Research.

[30]  J P Frisby,et al.  PMF: A Stereo Correspondence Algorithm Using a Disparity Gradient Limit , 1985, Perception.

[31]  B. C. Motter,et al.  Responses of neurons in visual cortex (V1 and V2) of the alert macaque to dynamic random-dot stereograms , 1985, Vision Research.

[32]  A. Parker,et al.  Range and mechanism of encoding of horizontal disparity in macaque V1. , 2002, Journal of neurophysiology.

[33]  I. Ohzawa,et al.  Encoding of binocular disparity by complex cells in the cat's visual cortex. , 1996, Journal of neurophysiology.

[34]  P. O. Bishop,et al.  Analysis of retinal correspondence by studying receptive fields of rinocular single units in cat striate cortex , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[35]  P. O. Bishop NEURAL MECHANISMS FOR BINOCULAR DEPTH DISCRIMINATION , 1981 .