Fidelity and the Speed of the Treadmill: The Combined Impact of Population Size, Transmission Fidelity, and Selection on the Accumulation of Cultural Complexity

Human culture signifies the emergence of an entirely new domain of existence: an event in natural history that is paralleled only by the Cambrian Explosion in terms of creativity and scope. The question of how human culture as opposed to its animal counter parts came to become open-endedly creative and cumulative is therefore one of wide and general scientific importance. Several causal factors have been proposed to date to explain this unique quality, including population size, transmission fidelity, pedagogy, and creativity. Inquiries, however, tend to focus exclusively on one factor at a time, leaving us blind to important issues regarding their relative roles and combined action. We here combine two models, one focusing on population size and the other on imitation fidelity, as constraints and enablers of evolutionary cumulativity. We explore how these factors interact to promote and inhibit evolutionary cumulativity and how the synthetic model compares to the original models individually and to empirical and experimental data. We report several findings that do not emerge in the models that we combine individually. For example, group size is found to be important for small but not for larger groups, an observation that moreover substantially improves agreement with data.

[1]  Alex Mesoudi,et al.  An experimental demonstration of the effect of group size on cultural accumulation , 2014 .

[2]  Lydia M. Hopper,et al.  Emulation, imitation, over-imitation and the scope of culture for child and chimpanzee , 2009, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[3]  A. Bell Cultural evolution and the way we count , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[4]  E. Chaisson Practical Applications of Cosmology to Human Society , 2014, 1406.6328.

[5]  E. Domingo,et al.  Viral Quasispecies Evolution , 2012, Microbiology and Molecular Reviews.

[6]  Human evolution: Group size determines cultural complexity , 2013, Nature.

[7]  Dwight Read,et al.  Group size and cultural complexity , 2014, Nature.

[8]  Dan Sperber,et al.  Imitation explains the propagation, not the stability of animal culture , 2010, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[9]  Kim Sterelny,et al.  From hominins to humans: how sapiens became behaviourally modern , 2011, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[10]  Wataru Nakahashi,et al.  The effect of cultural interaction on cumulative cultural evolution. , 2014, Journal of theoretical biology.

[11]  A. Bell Linking Observed Learning Patterns to the Evolution of Cultural Complexity , 2015, Current Anthropology.

[12]  S. Shennan Demography and Cultural Innovation: a Model and its Implications for the Emergence of Modern Human Culture , 2001, Cambridge Archaeological Journal.

[13]  J. Henrich Demography and Cultural Evolution: How Adaptive Cultural Processes Can Produce Maladaptive Losses—The Tasmanian Case , 2004, American Antiquity.

[14]  K. Vaesen,et al.  Complexity and Demographic Explanations of Cumulative Culture , 2014, PloS one.

[15]  E. Carbonell,et al.  Sleeping Activity Area within the Site Structure of Archaic Human Groups , 2010, Current Anthropology.

[16]  Jamshid J. Tehrani,et al.  Towards an archaeology of pedagogy: learning, teaching and the generation of material culture traditions , 2008 .

[17]  K. Vaesen The cognitive bases of human tool use , 2012, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[18]  Dwight Read,et al.  An Interaction Model for Resource Implement Complexity Based on Risk and Number of Annual Moves , 2008, American Antiquity.

[19]  G. Csibra,et al.  Natural pedagogy , 2009, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[20]  A. Brooks,et al.  The revolution that wasn't: a new interpretation of the origin of modern human behavior. , 2000, Journal of human evolution.

[21]  Dwight W Read,et al.  A multitrajectory, competition model of emergent complexity in human social organization , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[22]  M. Eigen Selforganization of matter and the evolution of biological macromolecules , 1971, Naturwissenschaften.

[23]  G. Csibra,et al.  Natural pedagogy as evolutionary adaptation , 2011, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[24]  R. Baldini Revisiting the effect of population size on cumulative cultural evolution , 2013, bioRxiv.

[25]  Dwight Read,et al.  Tasmanian Knowledge and Skill: Maladaptive Imitation or Adequate Technology? , 2006, American Antiquity.

[26]  Magnus Enquist,et al.  One cultural parent makes no culture , 2010, Animal Behaviour.

[27]  Adam Powell,et al.  Late Pleistocene Demography and the Appearance of Modern Human Behavior , 2009, Science.

[28]  L. Keeley Hunter-gatherer economic complexity and “population pressure”: A cross-cultural analysis , 1988 .

[29]  M. Eigen,et al.  The Hypercycle: A principle of natural self-organization , 2009 .

[30]  Nicholas Shea,et al.  Imitation as an inheritance system , 2009, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[31]  Dwight W. Read,et al.  The Emergence of Order from Disorder as a Form of Self Organization , 2003, Comput. Math. Organ. Theory.

[32]  Kevin E. Langergraber,et al.  Inconclusive evidence for patrilocality in Neandertals , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[33]  Eske Willerslev,et al.  Genetic evidence for patrilocal mating behavior among Neandertal groups , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[34]  M. Tomasello,et al.  Ratcheting up the ratchet: on the evolution of cumulative culture , 2009, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[35]  R. Boyd,et al.  Population size predicts technological complexity in Oceania , 2010, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[36]  R. Alexander Bentley,et al.  Stimulated Variation and Cascades: Two Processes in the Evolution of Complex Technological Systems , 2011 .

[37]  Yutaka Kobayashi,et al.  Innovativeness, population size and cumulative cultural evolution. , 2012, Theoretical population biology.

[38]  A. Whiten,et al.  Causal knowledge and imitation/emulation switching in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and children (Homo sapiens) , 2005, Animal Cognition.

[39]  M. Moffett Human Identity and the Evolution of Societies , 2013, Human Nature.

[40]  Maxime Derex,et al.  Experimental evidence for the influence of group size on cultural complexity , 2013, Nature.

[41]  M Nilsson,et al.  Error thresholds for quasispecies on dynamic fitness landscapes. , 1999, Physical review letters.

[42]  Peter Richerson,et al.  Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence , 2014, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[43]  J. Drake Rates of spontaneous mutation among RNA viruses. , 1993, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[44]  M. J. O’Brien,et al.  Population Size as an Explanation for Patterns in the Paleolithic Archaeological Record , 2013, Current Anthropology.

[45]  D. Read,et al.  The Evolution of Cultural Complexity: Not by the Treadmill Alone , 2016, Current Anthropology.