A Pilot Study of Varying Thoracic and Abdominal Compression in a Reconfigurable Trunk Exoskeleton During Different Activities

Objective: Trunk exoskeletons are a new technology with great promise for human rehabilitation, assistance and augmentation. However, it is unclear how different exoskeleton features affect the wearer's body during different activities. This study thus examined how varying a trunk exoskeleton's thoracic and abdominal compression affects trunk kinematics and muscle demand during several activities. Methods: We developed a trunk exoskeleton that allows thoracic and abdominal compression to be changed quickly and independently. To evaluate the effect of varying compression, 12 participants took part in a two-session study. In the first session, they performed three activities (walking, sit-to-stand, lifting a box). In the second session, they experienced unexpected perturbations while sitting. This was done both without the exoskeleton and in four exoskeleton configurations with different thoracic and abdominal compression levels. Trunk flexion angle, low back extension moment and the electromyogram of the erector spinae and rectus abdominis were measured in both sessions. Results: Different exoskeleton compression levels resulted in significantly different peak trunk flexion angles and peak electromyograms of the erector spinae. However, the effects of compression differed significantly between activities. Conclusion: Our results indicate that a trunk exoskeleton's thoracic and abdominal compression affect the wearer's kinematics and muscle demand; furthermore, a single compression configuration is not appropriate for all activities. Significance: The study suggests that future trunk exoskeletons should either be able to vary their compression levels to suit different activities or should have the compression designed for a specific activity in order to be beneficial to the wearer.

[1]  J. H. van Dieen,et al.  SPEXOR: Towards a Passive Spinal Exoskeleton , 2017 .

[2]  Bram Vanderborght,et al.  Passive Back Support Exoskeleton Improves Range of Motion Using Flexible Beams , 2018, Front. Robot. AI.

[3]  I. Kingma,et al.  Validation of a full body 3-D dynamic linked segment model , 1996 .

[4]  Sunil K. Agrawal,et al.  Robotic Spine Exoskeleton (RoSE): Characterizing the 3-D Stiffness of the Human Torso in the Treatment of Spine Deformity , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[5]  Annette Kienle,et al.  Effect of 2 Different Thoracolumbar Orthoses on the Stability of the Spine During Various Body Movements , 2013, Spine.

[6]  J. Ashton-Miller,et al.  Active Spinal Orthosis to Reduce Lumbar Postural Muscle Activity in Flexed Postures , 2016 .

[7]  Sarah L. Logan,et al.  A Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Extensible and Inextensible Lumbosacral Orthoses and Standard Care Alone in the Management of Lower Back Pain , 2014, Spine.

[8]  Kenton R Kaufman,et al.  Video Fluoroscopic Analysis of the Effects of Three Commonly-Prescribed Off-the-Shelf Orthoses on Vertebral Motion , 2010, Spine.

[9]  Karl E. Zelik,et al.  Feasibility of a Biomechanically-Assistive Garment to Reduce Low Back Loading During Leaning and Lifting , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[10]  J. Chenot,et al.  Non-Specific Low Back Pain. , 2017, Deutsches Arzteblatt international.

[11]  Robert Riener,et al.  A lower limb exoskeleton research platform to investigate human-robot interaction , 2015, 2015 IEEE International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics (ICORR).

[12]  Gary Burnett,et al.  Translational Motion Tracking of Leg Joints for Enhanced Prediction of Walking Tasks , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[13]  Bram Vanderborght,et al.  Metabolic Effects Induced by a Kinematically Compatible Hip Exoskeleton During STS , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[14]  Timothy J Wilt,et al.  Noninvasive Treatments for Acute, Subacute, and Chronic Low Back Pain: A Clinical Practice Guideline From the American College of Physicians. , 2017, Annals of internal medicine.

[15]  H. Houdijk,et al.  The effect of a passive trunk exoskeleton on functional performance in healthy individuals. , 2018, Applied ergonomics.

[17]  M. de Looze,et al.  Assessment of an active industrial exoskeleton to aid dynamic lifting and lowering manual handling tasks. , 2018, Applied Ergonomics.

[18]  Martin Underwood,et al.  Non-specific low back pain , 2012, The Lancet.

[19]  W. Marras,et al.  Cost-benefit of muscle cocontraction in protecting against spinal instability. , 2000, Spine.

[20]  Conor Walsh,et al.  Physical interface dynamics alter how robotic exosuits augment human movement: implications for optimizing wearable assistive devices , 2017, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[21]  P. Willems.  Decision Making in Surgical Treatment of Chronic Low Back Pain: The performance of prognostic tests to select patients for lumbar spinal fusion , 2013, Acta orthopaedica. Supplementum.

[22]  J. Cholewicki,et al.  Can lumbosacral orthoses cause trunk muscle weakness? A systematic review of literature. , 2017, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.

[23]  Frank Krause,et al.  Exoskeletons for industrial application and their potential effects on physical work load , 2016, Ergonomics.

[24]  Rachel Senden,et al.  Evaluating the Immobilization Effect of Spinal Orthoses Using Sensor-Based Motion Analysis , 2016 .

[25]  T. Hewett,et al.  Deficits in Neuromuscular Control of the Trunk Predict Knee Injury Risk , 2007, The American journal of sports medicine.

[26]  T. Vos,et al.  Global, regional, and national incidence and prevalence, and years lived with disability for 328 diseases and injuries in 195 countries, 1990-2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016 , 2017 .

[27]  P. Leva.  Adjustments to Zatsiorsky-Seluyanov's segment inertia parameters. , 1996 .

[28]  Darwin G. Caldwell,et al.  Rationale, Implementation and Evaluation of Assistive Strategies for an Active Back-Support Exoskeleton , 2018, Front. Robot. AI.

[29]  Yanxin Zhang,et al.  Estimation of lumbar spinal loading and trunk muscle forces during asymmetric lifting tasks: application of whole-body musculoskeletal modelling in OpenSim , 2017, Ergonomics.

[30]  Alan D. Lopez,et al.  The Global Burden of Disease Study , 2003 .

[31]  Domen Novak,et al.  Design and Pilot Evaluation of a Reconfigurable Spinal Exoskeleton , 2018, 2018 40th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC).