Connected and autonomous vehicles coordinating method at intersection utilizing preassigned slots

Connected and Autonomous Vehicle (CAV) technology contributes to the possibility of slot-based intersections (SIs). SIs allows vehicle to cross the intersection through the gap between two vehicles that are coming from the conflicting direction. A slots preassigning method is proposed in this paper. A status adjusting area is set up to realize the method. When vehicles enter the status adjusting area, manage center begins to calculate the target status that each vehicle should reach and generate vehicle operating suggestions based on method of Location Optimization On Sequence Evaluation (LOOSE) and Cooperative Optimization Method for Previous Allocation Alternatively Transforming (COMPACT). LOOSE is mainly used for keeping vehicles safe. And COMPACT is applied based on LOOSE, to generate vehicle operating suggestions and improve the traffic efficiency. As long as the vehicle follows the suggestions and maintains the optimal speed, the vehicle would cross the intersection without stop and collision. A simulation environment has established to evaluate the effectiveness of the approach. The results showed that capacity of preassigned SIs increases as defined minimum safe gap decreases. The capacity reaches its maximum in the condition that traffic flows from different directions are equivalent. And the proposed method performs better than signal based intersections.

[1]  Subir Biswas,et al.  Vehicle-to-vehicle wireless communication protocols for enhancing highway traffic safety , 2006, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[2]  Feng Yu-qin,et al.  Travel Time Model of Left-Turning Vehicles at Signalized Intersection , 2012 .

[3]  Stephen D. Boyles,et al.  Auction-based autonomous intersection management , 2013, 16th International IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC 2013).

[4]  Xuedong Yan,et al.  Effects of major-road vehicle speed and driver age and gender on left-turn gap acceptance. , 2007, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[5]  Stephen D. Boyles,et al.  Intersection Auctions and Reservation-Based Control in Dynamic Traffic Assignment , 2015 .

[6]  Sascha Ossowski,et al.  A Market-Inspired Approach for Intersection Management in Urban Road Traffic Networks , 2014, J. Artif. Intell. Res..

[7]  R. Jiang,et al.  Full velocity difference model for a car-following theory. , 2001, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[8]  W. Wu,et al.  Modelling and Simulation of Vehicle Speed Guidance in Connected Vehicle Environment , 2015 .

[9]  Byungkyu Brian Park,et al.  Development and Evaluation of a Cooperative Vehicle Intersection Control Algorithm Under the Connected Vehicles Environment , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[10]  Peter Stone,et al.  Multiagent traffic management: a reservation-based intersection control mechanism , 2004, Proceedings of the Third International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, 2004. AAMAS 2004..

[11]  Hillel Bar-Gera,et al.  Vortex-Based Zero-Conflict Design of Urban Road Networks , 2013 .

[12]  Peter Stone,et al.  A Multiagent Approach to Autonomous Intersection Management , 2008, J. Artif. Intell. Res..

[13]  Baigen Cai,et al.  Unsignalized cooperative optimization control method based on vehicle speed guidance and information interaction , 2014, 17th International IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC).

[14]  Tarek Sayed,et al.  Framework for evaluating risk of limited sight distance for permitted left-turn movements: case study , 2016 .

[15]  Emilio Frazzoli,et al.  Revisiting Street Intersections Using Slot-Based Systems , 2016, PloS one.