On the role of X and simple cells in human contrast processing

We investigated the potential role of retinal X and cortical simple cells in determining human psychophysical detection performance under contrast masking conditions. Since both X and simple cells exhibit a null phase, the phase of a background mask should affect the visibility of a test grating processed by such cells. Sinusoidal test gratings of either 1 or 7 c/deg were presented as a sustained or transient increment against a background mask of the same size and spatial frequency at either 0 or 90 deg phase. For background contrasts from 0.5% up to 40%, psychophysical contrast sensitivity was phase-independent for all conditions. Therefore, either (1) contrast threshold is mediated by cells with non-linear spatial summation properties, such as Y or complex cells, or (2) the masking effect of the background occurs after a phase-insensitive combination or pooling of simple cell responses in the cortex.

[1]  R. Shapley,et al.  X and Y cells in the lateral geniculate nucleus of macaque monkeys. , 1982, The Journal of physiology.

[2]  P. Lennie,et al.  Spatial and temporal contrast sensitivities of neurones in lateral geniculate nucleus of macaque. , 1984, The Journal of physiology.

[3]  D. Hubel,et al.  Anatomy and physiology of a color system in the primate visual cortex , 1984, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[4]  Leslie G. Ungerleider.  Two cortical visual systems , 1982 .

[5]  J Nachmias,et al.  Letter: Grating contrast: discrimination may be better than detection. , 1974, Vision research.

[6]  U. Tulunay-Keesey,et al.  Phase selectivity of spatial frequency channels. , 1980, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[7]  D. G. Albrecht,et al.  Striate cortex of monkey and cat: contrast response function. , 1982, Journal of neurophysiology.

[8]  DH Hubel,et al.  Color and contrast sensitivity in the lateral geniculate body and primary visual cortex of the macaque monkey , 1990, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[9]  William H. Merigan,et al.  Spatio-temporal vision of macaques with severe loss of Pβ retinal ganglion cells , 1986, Vision Research.

[10]  H. Wilson,et al.  Spatial frequency tuning of orientation selective units estimated by oblique masking , 1983, Vision Research.

[11]  G. Legge.  Sustained and transient mechanisms in human vision: Temporal and spatial properties , 1978, Vision Research.

[12]  A. Norcia,et al.  Contrast dependence of the oscillatory motion threshold across the visual field. , 1992, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[13]  J. Maunsell,et al.  The effects of parvocellular lateral geniculate lesions on the acuity and contrast sensitivity of macaque monkeys , 1991, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[14]  I. Ohzawa,et al.  A comparison of contrast detection and discrimination , 1986, Vision Research.

[15]  Gordon E. Legge,et al.  Light and dark bars; contrast discrimination , 1983, Vision Research.

[16]  John H. R. Maunsell,et al.  Hierarchical organization and functional streams in the visual cortex , 1983, Trends in Neurosciences.

[17]  C. Enroth-Cugell,et al.  The contrast sensitivity of retinal ganglion cells of the cat , 1966, The Journal of physiology.

[18]  C. F. Stromeyer,et al.  Low spatial-frequency channels in human vision: Adaptation and masking , 1982, Vision Research.

[19]  C W Tyler,et al.  Different spatial tunings for ON and OFF pathway stimulation , 1992, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[20]  S. F. Bowne.  Contrast discrimination cannot explain spatial frequency, orientation or temporal frequency discrimination , 1990, Vision Research.

[21]  J. Kulikowski,et al.  Effective contrast constancy and linearity of contrast sensation , 1976, Vision Research.

[22]  D. Pollen,et al.  Phase relationships between adjacent simple cells in the visual cortex. , 1981, Science.

[23]  C. Enroth-Cugell,et al.  Chapter 9 Visual adaptation and retinal gain controls , 1984 .

[24]  R. Shapley,et al.  The primate retina contains two types of ganglion cells, with high and low contrast sensitivity. , 1986, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[25]  J. Maunsell,et al.  Macaque vision after magnocellular lateral geniculate lesions , 1990, Visual Neuroscience.

[26]  D. Hubel,et al.  Receptive fields, binocular interaction and functional architecture in the cat's visual cortex , 1962, The Journal of physiology.

[27]  J. Robson.  Spatial and Temporal Contrast-Sensitivity Functions of the Visual System , 1966 .

[28]  N. Logothetis,et al.  Role of the color-opponent and broad-band channels in vision , 1990, Visual Neuroscience.

[29]  E. Switkes,et al.  Functional anatomy of macaque striate cortex. III. Color , 1988, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[30]  J. M. Foley,et al.  Contrast masking in human vision. , 1980, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[31]  G. Legge.  A power law for contrast discrimination , 1981, Vision Research.

[32]  T. B. Lawton,et al.  The effect of phase structures on spatial phase discrimination , 1984, Vision Research.

[33]  G. B. Wetherill,et al.  SEQUENTIAL ESTIMATION OF POINTS ON A PSYCHOMETRIC FUNCTION. , 1965, The British journal of mathematical and statistical psychology.

[34]  J. Kulikowski,et al.  Complete adaptation to patterned stimuli: A necessary and sufficient condition for Weber's law for contrast , 1978, Vision Research.

[35]  M. Georgeson,et al.  Facilitation and masking of briefly presented gratings: Time-course and contrast dependence , 1987, Vision Research.

[36]  J. Movshon,et al.  The statistical reliability of signals in single neurons in cat and monkey visual cortex , 1983, Vision Research.