Quadrature subunits in directionally selective simple cells: Counterphase and drifting grating responses

Here we examine further the basis for directional selectivity (DS) in simple cells of the cat's striate cortex. We use a distinctly different input stimulus and different analysis of the output signal for the same type of space-time inseparable receptive field (RF) that was measured with flashing bars in the companion paper (Emerson, 1997). As in the companion paper, we have mimicked a popular "linear" model with a single "branch" that consists of a linear spatiotemporal filter followed by a soft threshold, which should mimic any simple cells that have a single subunit. Counterphase sinusoidal measurements of such a configuration always generate elliptically shaped polar plots of amplitude versus temporal phase, often pinched along the minor axis because of a high threshold. However, for many spatiotemporal frequencies, such polar phase plots, as measured in simple cells by others, show a consistent rotational phase skew. Here we apply counterphase analysis to the same 2-branch model as developed in the companion paper. We show that the model accounts for the skew as the summation of signals from linear filters separated spatially and temporally by approximately 90 deg (i.e. in spatiotemporal phase quadrature), each separated from the output stage by a soft-threshold nonlinearity. We also prove conclusively that such skew cannot be generated by a single-subunit configuration. This demonstration supports the proposed two-subunit structure for DS simple cells, such as in the example from the companion paper, which has strong linear contributions from its inseparable RF. The presence of at least two nonlinear subunits appears to be an obligatory concomitant of DS in all visual cortical cells. The primary function of these subunits may be to enhance the strength of responses to images moving in the preferred direction, as in complex cells. However, subunits may also aid in identifying the moving object through overcoming, at least partially, the phase-concealing properties of the neuron's threshold by generating a steady signal that effectively decreases the threshold for the preferred direction.

[1]  C. Enroth-Cugell,et al.  The contrast sensitivity of retinal ganglion cells of the cat , 1966, The Journal of physiology.

[2]  W Reichardt,et al.  Visual control of orientation behaviour in the fly: Part II. Towards the underlying neural interactions , 1976, Quarterly Reviews of Biophysics.

[3]  J. Movshon,et al.  Spatial summation in the receptive fields of simple cells in the cat's striate cortex. , 1978, The Journal of physiology.

[4]  G. Sandini,et al.  Responses of visual cortical cells to periodic and non‐periodic stimuli. , 1979, The Journal of physiology.

[5]  B. B. Lee,et al.  Phase of responses to sinusoidal gratings of simple cells in cat striate cortex. , 1981, Journal of Neurophysiology.

[6]  E H Adelson,et al.  Spatiotemporal energy models for the perception of motion. , 1985, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[7]  J. Victor.  The dynamics of the cat retinal X cell centre. , 1987, The Journal of physiology.

[8]  J. P. Jones,et al.  The two-dimensional spatial structure of simple receptive fields in cat striate cortex. , 1987, Journal of neurophysiology.

[9]  Klein,et al.  Nonlinear directionally selective subunits in complex cells of cat striate cortex. , 1987, Journal of neurophysiology.

[10]  R. Shapley,et al.  Linear mechanisms of directional selectivity in simple cells of cat striate cortex. , 1987, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[11]  Michael J. Korenberg,et al.  Identification of Intensive Nonlinearities in Cascade Models of Visual Cortex and its Relation to Cell Classification , 1989 .

[12]  A. B. Bonds,et al.  Inhibitory refinement of spatial frequency selectivity in single cells of the cat striate cortex , 1991, Vision Research.

[13]  D. Tolhurst,et al.  Evaluation of a linear model of directional selectivity in simple cells of the cat's striate cortex , 1991, Visual Neuroscience.

[14]  D. G. Albrecht,et al.  Motion selectivity and the contrast-response function of simple cells in the visual cortex , 1991, Visual Neuroscience.

[15]  R. Shapley,et al.  Directional selectivity and spatiotemporal structure of receptive fields of simple cells in cat striate cortex. , 1991, Journal of neurophysiology.

[16]  A. B. Bonds.  Temporal dynamics of contrast gain in single cells of the cat striate cortex , 1991, Visual Neuroscience.

[17]  E. Adelson,et al.  Directionally selective complex cells and the computation of motion energy in cat visual cortex , 1992, Vision Research.

[18]  D. Heeger.  Half-squaring in responses of cat striate cells , 1992, Visual Neuroscience.

[19]  I. Ohzawa,et al.  Spatiotemporal organization of simple-cell receptive fields in the cat's striate cortex. II. Linearity of temporal and spatial summation. , 1993, Journal of neurophysiology.

[20]  D. Heeger.  Modeling simple-cell direction selectivity with normalized, half-squared, linear operators. , 1993, Journal of neurophysiology.

[21]  D. Ferster,et al.  Linearity of summation of synaptic potentials underlying direction selectivity in simple cells of the cat visual cortex. , 1993, Science.

[22]  SIMPLE CELLS, SPATIOTEMPORAL FREQUENCY AND CONTRAST , 1994 .

[23]  L. Palmer,et al.  Contribution of linear mechanisms to the specification of local motion by simple cells in areas 17 and 18 of the cat , 1994, Visual Neuroscience.

[24]  L. Kontsevich.  The nature of the inputs to cortical motion detectors , 1995, Vision Research.

[25]  R. C. Emerson.  Quadrature subunits in directionally selective simple cells: Spatiotemporal interactions , 1997, Visual Neuroscience.