The Influence of Discipline on Teachers' Knowledge and Decision Making

The knowledge required by teachers has long been a focus of public and academic attention. Following a period of intense research interest in teachers’ knowledge in the 1980s and 1990s, many researchers have adopted Shulman’s suggestion that expert teaching practice is based on seven forms of knowledge which collectively are referred to as a knowledge base for teaching. Shulman’s work also offered a decision-making framework known as pedagogical reasoning and action, which allows teachers to use their seven forms of knowledge to make effective pedagogical decisions. Despite the widespread acceptance of these ideas, no empirical evidence exploring the connections between knowledge and decision-making is evident in the research literature. This paper reports on a pilot study in which the connections between knowledge and decisions in science, mathematics and information technology teachers’ lesson plans are quantified and represented using epistemic network analysis. Findings reveal and levels of complexity that have been intimated but, until now, not supported with empirical evidence.

[1]  David Williamson Shaffer,et al.  Mentor modeling: the internalization of modeled professional thinking in an epistemic game , 2010, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[2]  Charoula Angeli,et al.  Preservice elementary teachers as information and communication technology designers: an instructional systems design model based on an expanded view of pedagogical content knowledge , 2005, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[3]  Dragan Gasevic,et al.  SENS: Network analytics to combine social and cognitive perspectives of collaborative learning , 2019, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[4]  J. Sachs Teacher professionalism: why are we still talking about it? , 2016 .

[5]  Gary D. Fenstermacher Chapter 1: The Knower and the Known: The Nature of Knowledge in Research on Teaching , 1994 .

[6]  David Williamson Shaffer,et al.  A Tutorial on Epistemic Network Analysis: Analyzing the Structure of Connections in Cognitive, Social, and Interaction Data , 2016, J. Learn. Anal..

[7]  Evrim Baran,et al.  Observing the Indicators of Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge in Science Classrooms: Video-Based Research , 2019, Journal of Research on Technology in Education.

[8]  Allan MacKinnon,et al.  Craft Knowledge and the Education of Teachers , 1992 .

[9]  D. Clandinin,et al.  Teachers' personal knowledge: What counts as ‘personal’ in studies of the personal∗ , 1987 .

[10]  Melissa Erlene Pierson,et al.  Technology Integration Practice as a Function of Pedagogical Expertise , 2001 .

[11]  L. Shulman Those Who Understand: Knowledge Growth in Teaching , 1986 .

[12]  Christine A. Ogren Rethinking the "Nontraditional" Student from a Historical Perspective: State Normal Schools in the Late Nineteenth and Early Twentieth Centuries , 2003 .

[13]  Sonia Guerriero,et al.  Teachers' pedagogical knowledge: What it is and how it functions , 2017 .

[14]  D. Shaffer Epistemic Frames and Islands of Expertise: Learning from Infusion Experiences , 2004, ICLS.

[15]  L. Shulman The wisdom of practice , 2004 .

[16]  Dragan Gasevic,et al.  Towards Combined Network and Text Analytics of Student Discourse in Online Discussions , 2018, AIED.

[17]  L. Shulman Knowledge and Teaching: Foundations of the New Reform , 1987 .

[18]  Louise Starkey Teachers’ pedagogical reasoning and action in the digital age , 2010 .

[19]  Matthew J. Koehler,et al.  Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge: A Framework for Teacher Knowledge , 2006, Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education.

[20]  J. Loughran,et al.  Pedagogical Reasoning in Teacher Education , 2016 .

[21]  Elizabeth Bagley,et al.  Epistemic network analysis : a Prototype for 21 st Century assessment of Learning , 2009 .

[22]  P. Mulhall,et al.  In search of pedagogical content knowledge in science: Developing ways of articulating and documenting professional practice , 2004 .

[23]  Joshua M. Rosenberg,et al.  TPCK/TPACK research and development: Past, present, and future directions , 2017 .

[24]  L. S. Schulman Paradigms and research programs in the study of teaching , 1986 .