Altruism toward in-group members as a reputation mechanism

Abstract To test the hypothesis that sensitivity to monitoring drives people to act altruistically toward members of their own community, two experiments investigated whether an eye-like painting promotes altruism toward in-group members, but not toward out-group members. Participants played the role of dictator in a dictator game with another participant (a recipient) who was from the minimal in-group or out-group. Participants knew whether their recipient was an in-group member or an out-group member, but were informed that their recipient did not know the group membership of the dictator. In-group favoritism occurred only when participants were facing a computer desktop which displayed a painting of eyes, but did not occur in the absence of eyes. These findings demonstrate that the eye painting displayed on the participant's computer screen worked as a cue for monitoring and thus enhanced the participant's altruistic behavior.

[1]  R. W. Rogers,et al.  Effects of public and private self-awareness on deindividuation and aggression. , 1982 .

[2]  T. Yamagishi,et al.  [Effects of direct and indirect exchange on trust of in-group members]. , 2007, Shinrigaku kenkyu : The Japanese journal of psychology.

[3]  T. Kiyonari.  [Expectations of a generalized exchange system and ingroup favoritism: an experimental study of bounded reciprocity]. , 2002, The Japanese Journal of Psychology.

[4]  Toshio Yamagishi,et al.  Does Shared Group Membership Promote Altruism? , 2008 .

[5]  J. Kagel,et al.  Handbook of Experimental Economics , 1997 .

[6]  M. Nowak,et al.  Evolution of indirect reciprocity by image scoring , 1998, Nature.

[7]  John Tooby,et al.  Evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture, part I: Theoretical considerations , 1989 .

[8]  Pat Barclay,et al.  Partner choice creates competitive altruism in humans , 2007, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[9]  Joyce E. Berg,et al.  Trust, Reciprocity, and Social History , 1995 .

[10]  Terence C. Burnham,et al.  Engineering altruism: a theoretical and experimental investigation of anonymity and gift giving , 2003 .

[11]  Toshio Yamagishi,et al.  Exchanges of group-based favours: Ingroup bias in the prisoner's dilemma game with minimal groups in Japan and New Zealand , 2008 .

[12]  L. Cosmides,et al.  Evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture, part II: Case study: A computational theory of social exchange , 1989 .

[13]  Charles S. Carver,et al.  Divergent Influences of Private and Public Self-Consciousness in a Compliance Paradigm. , 1981 .

[14]  J. Henrich,et al.  Costly Punishment Across Human Societies , 2006, Science.

[15]  Dirk Semmann,et al.  Donors to charity gain in both indirect reciprocity and political reputation , 2002, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[16]  H. Tajfel,et al.  Social categorization and intergroup behaviour , 1971 .

[17]  Nobuyuki Takahashi,et al.  The importance of subjectivity in perceptual errors on the emergence of indirect reciprocity. , 2006, Journal of theoretical biology.

[18]  Terence C Burnham,et al.  Engineering Human Cooperation , 2007, Human nature.

[19]  K. Brechner,et al.  An Experimental Analysis of Social Traps. , 1977 .

[20]  J. Greenberg,et al.  Self-image versus impressional management in adherence to distributive justice standards: The influence of self-awareness and self-consciousness. , 1983 .

[21]  Toshio Yamagishi,et al.  False friends are worse than bitter enemies: “Altruistic” punishment of in-group members , 2004 .

[22]  Michael A. Hogg,et al.  Subjective Uncertainty and Intergroup Discrimination in the Minimal Group Situation , 1999 .

[23]  O. Leimar,et al.  Evolution of cooperation through indirect reciprocity , 2001, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[24]  Michael J. Platow,et al.  Comparisons of Australians and Japanese on group‐based cooperation , 2005 .

[25]  T. Yamagishi,et al.  The Group as the Container of Generalized Reciprocity , 2000 .

[26]  Pat Barclay.  Trustworthiness and competitive altruism can also solve the ''tragedy of the commons'' , 2004 .

[27]  J. Horowitz,et al.  Fairness in Simple Bargaining Experiments , 1994 .

[28]  U. Fischbacher,et al.  The nature of human altruism , 2003, Nature.

[29]  T. Yamagishi,et al.  Group-Based Trust in Strangers , 2009, Psychological science.

[30]  D. Fessler,et al.  Nobody's watching? Subtle cues affect generosity in an anonymous economic game. , 2005 .

[31]  V. Smith,et al.  Social distance and other-regarding behavior in dictator games , 2000 .

[32]  R. Boyd,et al.  Explaining altruistic behavior in humans , 2003 .

[33]  V. Edwin Bixenstine,et al.  Collaboration among six persons in a Prisoner's Dilemma game , 1966 .

[34]  R. Trivers.  The Evolution of Reciprocal Altruism , 1971, The Quarterly Review of Biology.

[35]  Brian Hare,et al.  Does Involuntary Neural Activation Increase Public Goods Contributions , 2007 .

[36]  E. Fehr,et al.  Altruistic punishment in humans , 2002, Nature.

[37]  X. T. Wang.  Domain-specific rationality in human choices: violations of utility axioms and social contexts , 1996, Cognition.

[38]  D. Messick,et al.  Motivational bases of choice in experimental games , 1968 .

[39]  S. Kitayama,et al.  Minimal Social Cues in the Dictator Game , 2009 .

[40]  R. Boyd,et al.  Indirect reciprocity can stabilize cooperation without the second-order free rider problem , 2004, Nature.

[41]  R. Koopmans,et al.  Collective action in culturally similar and dissimilar groups: an experiment on parochialism, conditional cooperation, and their linkages ☆,☆☆ , 2009 .

[42]  T. Yamagishi,et al.  [Ongoing group interaction, ingroup favoritism, and reward allocation]. , 2003, The Japanese Journal of Psychology.

[43]  W. Froming,et al.  Public and private self-awareness: When personal attitudes conflict with societal expectations , 1982 .

[44]  Robert Kurzban,et al.  The Social Psychophysics of Cooperation: Nonverbal Communication in a Public Goods Game , 2001 .

[45]  Robyn M. Dawes,et al.  Behavior, communication, and assumptions about other people's behavior in a commons dilemma situation. , 1977 .

[46]  W. Froming,et al.  Prosocial self-schemas, self-awareness, and children's prosocial behavior. , 1998, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[47]  V. Smith,et al.  Social Distance and Other-Regarding Behavior in Dictator Games: Reply , 1999 .

[48]  W. Hamilton,et al.  The Evolution of Cooperation , 1984 .

[49]  M. Bateson,et al.  Cues of being watched enhance cooperation in a real-world setting , 2006, Biology Letters.

[50]  W. Hamilton.  The genetical evolution of social behaviour. I. , 1964, Journal of theoretical biology.