Exploring the cell's network with molecular imaging

Molecular imaging is already a powerful tool for investigating molecular interactions within the cell. Interpreting molecular imaging findings will, however, take us into the more unfamiliar, nonlinear realm of networks. The network class of interest is the “scale‐free” network, which characterizes not only the cell, but also surprisingly, other real work networks such as the world wide web. This network topology yields insights in how the cell is functionally organized via motifs, modules, and different types of hubs. Additional organizational information is gained from the cell's evolutionary history. Interpretation of molecular images will be deepened by a both qualitative and quantitative knowledge of the cell's network. Importantly, cell network behavior can be independent of molecular detail. For this reason, the same molecule can serve different functions in different cells or even within the same cell. Since a scale‐free network's behavior is likely to be nonlinear and exhibit emergent behavior, a degree of caution is prudent in assigning cause and effect to molecular imaging findings in our effort to reengineer some of the cell's functions. Molecular imagers will need to be cognizant of the level of organization in the cell's network they are interrogating. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2006. © 2006 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

[1]  Albert,et al.  Emergence of scaling in random networks , 1999, Science.

[2]  E. Wimmer,et al.  MAP Kinase Phosphatase As a Locus of Flexibility in a Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Signaling Network , 2022 .

[3]  D. Featherstone,et al.  Wrestling with pleiotropy: genomic and topological analysis of the yeast gene expression network. , 2002, BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology.

[4]  C. Weitz,et al.  A role for cardiotrophin-like cytokine in the circadian control of mammalian locomotor activity , 2006, Nature Neuroscience.

[5]  S. Strogatz Exploring complex networks , 2001, Nature.

[6]  H E Stanley,et al.  Classes of small-world networks. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[7]  Richard C. Strohman,et al.  The coming Kuhnian revolution in biology , 1997, Nature Biotechnology.

[8]  Andrei Z. Broder,et al.  Graph structure in the Web , 2000, Comput. Networks.

[9]  P. Yodzis The Indeterminacy of Ecological Interactions as Perceived Through Perturbation Experiments , 1988 .

[10]  L. Hood,et al.  Reverse Engineering of Biological Complexity , 2007 .

[11]  T. Kitami,et al.  Biochemical networking contributes more to genetic buffering in human and mouse metabolic pathways than does gene duplication , 2002, Nature Genetics.

[12]  C. Thompson,et al.  PKC regulates a farnesyl-electrostatic switch on K-Ras that promotes its association with Bcl-XL on mitochondria and induces apoptosis. , 2006, Molecular cell.

[13]  M. Newman Models of the Small World: A Review , 2000, cond-mat/0001118.

[14]  S. Havlin,et al.  Scale-free networks are ultrasmall. , 2002, Physical review letters.

[15]  K. Sneppen,et al.  Specificity and Stability in Topology of Protein Networks , 2002, Science.

[16]  Fan Chung Graham,et al.  Duplication Models for Biological Networks , 2002, J. Comput. Biol..

[17]  L. Hood,et al.  A Genomic Regulatory Network for Development , 2002, Science.

[18]  Z N Oltvai,et al.  Evolutionary conservation of motif constituents in the yeast protein interaction network , 2003, Nature Genetics.

[19]  U. Alon Biological Networks: The Tinkerer as an Engineer , 2003, Science.

[20]  F. McCormick,et al.  Killing time for cancer cells , 2005, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[21]  A. Barabasi,et al.  Network biology: understanding the cell's functional organization , 2004, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[22]  Andy M. Yip,et al.  The Generalized Topological Overlap Matrix for Detecting Modules in Gene Networks , 2006, BIOCOMP.

[23]  Albert-László Barabási,et al.  Error and attack tolerance of complex networks , 2000, Nature.

[24]  Enid Mumford,et al.  Reengineering the Corporation: A Manifesto for Business Revolution , 1995 .

[25]  J. Dick,et al.  Acute myeloid leukemia originates from a hierarchy of leukemic stem cell classes that differ in self-renewal capacity , 2004, Nature Immunology.

[26]  A. Barabasi,et al.  Hierarchical Organization of Modularity in Metabolic Networks , 2002, Science.

[27]  Albert-László Barabási,et al.  The physics of the Web , 2001 .

[28]  Roger E Bumgarner,et al.  Integrated genomic and proteomic analyses of a systematically perturbed metabolic network. , 2001, Science.

[29]  Arend Sidow,et al.  Sequence First. Ask Questions Later. , 2002, Cell.

[30]  J. Collado-Vides,et al.  Microbial computational genomics of gene regulation , 2002 .

[31]  Sharon L. Milgram,et al.  The Small World Problem , 1967 .

[32]  B. T. LOWNE,et al.  The Origin of Insects , 1871, Nature.

[33]  A. Wagner The yeast protein interaction network evolves rapidly and contains few redundant duplicate genes. , 2001, Molecular biology and evolution.

[34]  Nicola J. Rinaldi,et al.  Computational discovery of gene modules and regulatory networks , 2003, Nature Biotechnology.

[35]  Per Bak,et al.  How Nature Works , 1996 .

[36]  Thomas Pfeiffer,et al.  Exploring the pathway structure of metabolism: decomposition into subnetworks and application to Mycoplasma pneumoniae , 2002, Bioinform..

[37]  Steven Johnson,et al.  Emergence: The Connected Lives of Ants, Brains, Cities, and Software , 2001 .

[38]  Araceli M. Huerta,et al.  From specific gene regulation to genomic networks: a global analysis of transcriptional regulation in Escherichia coli. , 1998, BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology.

[39]  John M. Swales,et al.  Consilience: The Unity of Knowledge , 1999 .

[40]  Albert-László Barabási,et al.  Scale-free networks , 2008, Scholarpedia.

[41]  M. Newman,et al.  The structure of scientific collaboration networks. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[42]  R. Solé,et al.  Evolving protein interaction networks through gene duplication. , 2003, Journal of theoretical biology.

[43]  Massimo Marchiori,et al.  Error and attacktolerance of complex network s , 2004 .

[44]  D S Callaway,et al.  Network robustness and fragility: percolation on random graphs. , 2000, Physical review letters.

[45]  D. Fell,et al.  The small world inside large metabolic networks , 2000, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[46]  D. Watts The “New” Science of Networks , 2004 .

[47]  A. Levine,et al.  Surfing the p53 network , 2000, Nature.

[48]  James Champy,et al.  Reengineering Management: The Mandate for New Leadership , 1995 .

[49]  David M. Raup,et al.  How Nature Works: The Science of Self-Organized Criticality , 1997 .

[50]  Mark Buchanan,et al.  Nexus: Small Worlds and the Groundbreaking Science of Networks , 2002 .

[51]  Mark Newman,et al.  Models of the Small World , 2000 .

[52]  E. Levanon,et al.  Preferential attachment in the protein network evolution. , 2003, Physical review letters.

[53]  D. Watts Networks, Dynamics, and the Small‐World Phenomenon1 , 1999, American Journal of Sociology.

[54]  Y. Lazebnik Can a biologist fix a radio? — or, what I learned while studying apoptosis , 2004, Biochemistry (Moscow).

[55]  Michalis Faloutsos,et al.  On power-law relationships of the Internet topology , 1999, SIGCOMM '99.

[56]  Eugene V Koonin,et al.  Horizontal gene transfer: the path to maturity , 2003, Molecular microbiology.

[57]  A. Barabasi,et al.  The topology of the transcription regulatory network in the yeast , 2002, cond-mat/0205181.

[58]  D. Hanahan,et al.  The Hallmarks of Cancer , 2000, Cell.

[59]  J. Hopfield,et al.  From molecular to modular cell biology , 1999, Nature.

[60]  L. Hood,et al.  Regulatory gene networks and the properties of the developmental process , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[61]  Jie Wu,et al.  Small Worlds: The Dynamics of Networks between Order and Randomness , 2003 .

[62]  James R. Knight,et al.  A Protein Interaction Map of Drosophila melanogaster , 2003, Science.

[63]  Joshua M. Stuart,et al.  A Gene-Coexpression Network for Global Discovery of Conserved Genetic Modules , 2003, Science.

[64]  Albert-László Barabási,et al.  Life's Complexity Pyramid , 2002, Science.

[65]  Cohen,et al.  Resilience of the internet to random breakdowns , 2000, Physical review letters.

[66]  A. Barabasi,et al.  Functional and topological characterization of protein interaction networks , 2004, Proteomics.

[67]  H. Mewes,et al.  Functional modules by relating protein interaction networks and gene expression. , 2003, Nucleic acids research.

[68]  Philip J. Cook,et al.  The Winner-Take-All Society: Why the Few at the Top Get So Much More Than the Rest of Us , 1996 .

[69]  Nicola J. Rinaldi,et al.  Transcriptional Regulatory Networks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2002, Science.

[70]  E. Koonin,et al.  The structure of the protein universe and genome evolution , 2002, Nature.

[71]  FaloutsosMichalis,et al.  On power-law relationships of the Internet topology , 1999 .

[72]  J. Levine,et al.  Surfing the p53 network , 2000, Nature.

[73]  V Latora,et al.  Efficient behavior of small-world networks. , 2001, Physical review letters.

[74]  César A. Hidalgo,et al.  Scale-free networks , 2008, Scholarpedia.

[75]  R. Albert,et al.  The large-scale organization of metabolic networks , 2000, Nature.

[76]  Andreas Wagner,et al.  Convergent evolution of gene circuits , 2003, Nature Genetics.

[77]  Petter Holme,et al.  Subnetwork hierarchies of biochemical pathways , 2002, Bioinform..

[78]  R. Penrose,et al.  A theory of everything? , 2005, Nature.

[79]  S. Redner,et al.  Connectivity of growing random networks. , 2000, Physical review letters.

[80]  U. Bhalla,et al.  Emergent properties of networks of biological signaling pathways. , 1999, Science.

[81]  Prahlad T. Ram,et al.  MAP Kinase Phosphatase As a Locus of Flexibility in a Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Signaling Network , 2002, Science.

[82]  Damir Sudar,et al.  Automated local bright feature image analysis of nuclear protein distribution identifies changes in tissue phenotype. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[83]  Alexander Rives,et al.  Modular organization of cellular networks , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[84]  S. Horvath,et al.  Gene connectivity, function, and sequence conservation: predictions from modular yeast co-expression networks , 2006, BMC Genomics.

[85]  H. Kitano Systems Biology: A Brief Overview , 2002, Science.

[86]  Eugene V Koonin,et al.  Gene family evolution: an in-depth theoretical and simulation analysis of non-linear birth-death-innovation models , 2004, BMC Evolutionary Biology.

[87]  Hod Lipson,et al.  ON THE ORIGIN OF MODULAR VARIATION , 2002, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[88]  A. Barabasi,et al.  Lethality and centrality in protein networks , 2001, Nature.

[89]  David J. Galas,et al.  A duplication growth model of gene expression networks , 2002, Bioinform..

[90]  S. Redner,et al.  Organization of growing random networks. , 2000, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[91]  M. Beeram,et al.  Raf: a strategic target for therapeutic development against cancer. , 2005, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[92]  Matthew Hall,et al.  Direct selection on male attractiveness and female preference fails to produce a response , 2004, BMC Evolutionary Biology.

[93]  S. Shen-Orr,et al.  Network motifs: simple building blocks of complex networks. , 2002, Science.

[94]  A. Wagner Robustness against mutations in genetic networks of yeast , 2000, Nature Genetics.

[95]  W. El-Deiry,et al.  Regulation of p53 downstream genes. , 1998, Seminars in cancer biology.

[96]  Eduardo Sontag,et al.  Building a cell cycle oscillator: hysteresis and bistability in the activation of Cdc2 , 2003, Nature Cell Biology.

[97]  Leroy Hood,et al.  The impact of systems approaches on biological problems in drug discovery , 2004, Nature Biotechnology.

[98]  Michael E Phelps,et al.  Systems Biology and New Technologies Enable Predictive and Preventative Medicine , 2004, Science.

[99]  F. Collins,et al.  A vision for the future of genomics research , 2003, Nature.

[100]  James H. Brown,et al.  The origin of allometric scaling laws in biology from genomes to ecosystems: towards a quantitative unifying theory of biological structure and organization , 2005, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[101]  U. Bhalla,et al.  Complexity in biological signaling systems. , 1999, Science.

[102]  B. Snel,et al.  The identification of functional modules from the genomic association of genes , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.