Barriers to adoption of RPAs on construction projects: a task–technology fit perspective

Extant literature extensively articulates the advantages of using remotely piloted aircrafts (RPAs) in a myriad of construction activities. Yet, the barriers that hinder their wider adoption on construction projects have received scant academic attention. This study aims at addressing this gap in the literature.,This study reviews 59 papers published on the use of RPAs for construction activities and offers an evaluation of barriers to widespread adoption throughout the sector.,Barriers are identified, collated and categorized into five thematic groups, namely, technical difficulties, restrictive regulatory environment, site-related problems, weather and organizational barriers.,The paper contributes to knowledge by: signposting a need for reordering priorities when defining future research on RPAs, suggesting measures to address the barriers identified and providing pragmatic guidance for construction companies intending to use RPAs on their projects.,Using the task–technology fit theory, the study uncovers that current RPA technology is an under-fit match for construction activities and represents a prominent barrier to adoption. This is a dissenting finding, given that past studies on RPAs have primarily focused upon addressing public acceptance, concerns and societal consequences. Enablers of the identified barriers are also collated from extant literature and contemporary practice and encapsulated in a conceptual model.

[1]  Chunlu Liu,et al.  Applications of multirotor drone technologies in construction management , 2019 .

[2]  William Greenwood,et al.  Applications of UAVs in Civil Infrastructure , 2019, Journal of Infrastructure Systems.

[3]  Robin Drogemuller,et al.  Digital engineering potential in addressing causes of construction accidents , 2018, Automation in Construction.

[4]  Masoud Gheisari,et al.  Unmanned aerial system applications in construction: a systematic review , 2018, Construction Innovation.

[5]  Kumkum Dubey,et al.  A Survey on Flash Translation Layer for NAND Flash Memory , 2018 .

[6]  Luca Benini,et al.  Ultra Low Power Deep-Learning-powered Autonomous Nano Drones , 2018, ArXiv.

[7]  George Vosselman,et al.  Evaluating the Societal Impact of Using Drones to Support Urban Upgrading Projects , 2018, ISPRS Int. J. Geo Inf..

[8]  Nektarios Karanikas,et al.  Hazard Analysis and Safety Requirements for Small Drone Operations: To What Extent Do Popular Drones Embed Safety? , 2018, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[9]  E. Zavadskas,et al.  Critical evaluation of off-site construction research: a scientometric analysis , 2018 .

[10]  Steven K. Ayer,et al.  Review of ICT Implementations for Facilitating Information Flow between Virtual Models and Construction Project Sites , 2018 .

[11]  Senem Velipasalar,et al.  Heat Mapping Drones: An Autonomous Computer-Vision-Based Procedure for Building Envelope Inspection Using Unmanned Aerial Systems (UAS) , 2018 .

[12]  Vladimir Murashov,et al.  Unmanned aerial vehicles in construction and worker safety. , 2018, American journal of industrial medicine.

[13]  Giuseppina Vacca,et al.  The Use of Nadir and Oblique UAV Images for Building Knowledge , 2017, ISPRS Int. J. Geo Inf..

[14]  Carrie Loveless.  Drones in Construction , 2017 .

[15]  Moncef L. Nehdi,et al.  Remote sensing of concrete bridge decks using unmanned aerial vehicle infrared thermography , 2017 .

[16]  Dayana Bastos Costa,et al.  Applicability of unmanned aerial system (UAS) for safety inspection on construction sites , 2017 .

[17]  David J. Edwards,et al.  Conceptualising the FinDD API plug-in: A study of BIM-FM integration , 2017 .

[18]  Arash Shahi,et al.  Roles, Benefits, and Challenges of Using UAVs for Indoor Smart Construction Applications , 2017 .

[19]  Rohan Bennett,et al.  Review of the Current State of UAV Regulations , 2017, Remote. Sens..

[20]  Luís Pádua,et al.  UAS, sensors, and data processing in agroforestry: a review towards practical applications , 2017 .

[21]  Mostafa Hassanalian,et al.  Classifications, applications, and design challenges of drones: A review , 2017 .

[22]  Oral Büyüköztürk,et al.  Deep Learning‐Based Crack Damage Detection Using Convolutional Neural Networks , 2017, Comput. Aided Civ. Infrastructure Eng..

[23]  Graham Wild,et al.  A Post-Accident Analysis of Civil Remotely-Piloted Aircraft System Accidents and Incidents , 2017 .

[24]  Abhinav Gupta,et al.  Learning to fly by crashing , 2017, 2017 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS).

[25]  Florence T. T. Phua,et al.  Does the built-environment industry attract risk-taking individuals? , 2017 .

[26]  Brenda McCabe,et al.  Automated computer vision-based detection of components of under-construction indoor partitions , 2017 .

[27]  Andrew R.J. Dainty,et al.  Construction Management and Economics: New Directions , 2017 .

[28]  Yongchao Yang,et al.  Robust data transmission and recovery of images by compressed sensing for structural health diagnosis , 2017 .

[29]  Mani Golparvar-Fard,et al.  Potential of big visual data and building information modeling for construction performance analytics: An exploratory study , 2017 .

[30]  David K. H. Chua,et al.  Potential Applications of UAV along the Construction's Value Chain , 2017 .

[31]  K. Wong,et al.  Nanotechnology in Batteries , 2017 .

[32]  Ralf Philipsen,et al.  Droning on About Drones—Acceptance of and Perceived Barriers to Drones in Civil Usage Contexts , 2017 .

[33]  F. Flager,et al.  EVALUATION OF COMPUTER VISION- AND 4D BIM-BASED CONSTRUCTION PROGRESS TRACKING ON A UAV PLATFORM , 2017 .

[34]  Ivan Bartoli,et al.  Bridge deck delamination identification from unmanned aerial vehicle infrared imagery , 2016 .

[35]  Fangliang Chen,et al.  Detecting and tracking vehicles in traffic by unmanned aerial vehicles , 2016 .

[36]  Calin Belta,et al.  Persistent surveillance for unmanned aerial vehicles subject to charging and temporal logic constraints , 2016, Auton. Robots.

[37]  Jianqiang Li,et al.  A Hybrid Path Planning Method in Unmanned Air/Ground Vehicle (UAV/UGV) Cooperative Systems , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology.

[38]  Akhtar Razali,et al.  Current development of UAV sense and avoid system , 2016 .

[39]  Ivan Bartoli,et al.  Bridge related damage quantification using unmanned aerial vehicle imagery , 2016 .

[40]  Lovorka Librić,et al.  Primjena bespilotnih letjelica na prometnoj infrastrukturnoj mreži , 2016 .

[41]  José L. Verdegay,et al.  Coverage path planning with unmanned aerial vehicles for 3D terrain reconstruction , 2016, Expert Syst. Appl..

[42]  Rocci Luppicini,et al.  A technoethical review of commercial drone use in the context of governance, ethics, and privacy , 2016 .

[43]  Yong K. Cho,et al.  A Point Cloud-Vision Hybrid Approach for 3D Location Tracking of Mobile Construction Assets , 2016 .

[44]  Masoud Gheisari,et al.  Coupling Wireless Sensor Networks and Unmanned Aerial Vehicles in Bridge Health Monitoring Systems , 2016 .

[45]  Dayana Bastos Costa,et al.  Potential Factors Influencing the Performance of Unmanned Aerial System (UAS) Integrated Safety Control for Construction Worksites , 2016 .

[46]  Michele Herrmann.  Unmanned Aerial Vehicles in Construction: An Overview of Current and Proposed Rules , 2016 .

[47]  Raja R. A. Issa,et al.  Feasibility Assessment of Unmanned Aircraft Systems for Construction Management Applications , 2016 .

[48]  Javier Irizarry,et al.  Exploratory Study of Potential Applications of Unmanned Aerial Systems for Construction Management Tasks , 2016 .

[49]  Bharadwaj Rao,et al.  The societal impact of commercial drones , 2016 .

[50]  Alessandro Sabato,et al.  An autonomous unmanned aerial vehicle sensing system for structural health monitoring of bridges , 2016, SPIE Smart Structures and Materials + Nondestructive Evaluation and Health Monitoring.

[51]  Barry Gledson,et al.  Hybrid project delivery processes observed in constructor BIM innovation adoption , 2016 .

[52]  Ferda Ofli,et al.  Combining Human Computing and Machine Learning to Make Sense of Big (Aerial) Data for Disaster Response , 2016, Big Data.

[53]  Wei Meng,et al.  Ultra-Wideband-Based Localization for Quadcopter Navigation , 2016, Unmanned Syst..

[54]  Mani Golparvar-Fard,et al.  Visual monitoring of civil infrastructure systems via camera-equipped Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs): a review of related works , 2016 .

[55]  Sven Overhage,et al.  New Vistas for Firefighter Information Systems? Towards a Systematic Evaluation of Emerging Technologies from a Task-Technology Fit Perspective , 2016, 2016 49th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS).

[56]  Matt Syal,et al.  Diffusion of green building guidelines as innovation in developing countries , 2016 .

[57]  Dayana Bastos Costa,et al.  Evaluating the Performance of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles for Safety Inspection , 2016 .

[58]  Christian Wietfeld,et al.  Design of an UWB indoor-positioning system for UAV navigation in GNSS-denied environments , 2015, 2015 International Conference on Indoor Positioning and Indoor Navigation (IPIN).

[59]  Tao Cheng,et al.  Proximity hazard indicator for workers-on-foot near miss interactions with construction equipment and geo-referenced hazard areas , 2015 .

[60]  Bill Canis.  Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS): Commercial Outlook for a New Industry , 2015 .

[61]  Fernando Caballero,et al.  Assembly planning for the construction of structures with multiple UAS equipped with robotic arms , 2015, 2015 International Conference on Unmanned Aircraft Systems (ICUAS).

[62]  Dominique A. Greer,et al.  Risk Perception and the Public Acceptance of Drones , 2015, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[63]  Jochen Teizer,et al.  Status quo and open challenges in vision-based sensing and tracking of temporary resources on infrastructure construction sites , 2015, Adv. Eng. Informatics.

[64]  SangHyun Lee,et al.  Computer vision techniques for construction safety and health monitoring , 2015, Adv. Eng. Informatics.

[65]  Nicholas Chileshe,et al.  Adopting global virtual engineering teams in AEC projects : a qualitative meta-analysis of innovation diffusion studies , 2015 .

[66]  Nunzio Motta,et al.  Design and flight testing of an integrated solar powered UAV and WSN for remote gas sensing , 2015, 2015 IEEE Aerospace Conference.

[67]  Alexey Bulgakov,et al.  Automation of 3D Building Model Generation Using Quadrotor , 2015 .

[68]  Johann Kranz,et al.  A Framework for Rigorously Identifying Research Gaps in Qualitative Literature Reviews , 2015, ICIS.

[69]  Wallace Imoudu Enegbuma,et al.  Preliminary building information modelling adoption model in Malaysia A strategic information technology perspective , 2014 .

[70]  David R. Shields,et al.  Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Applications and Issues for Construction , 2014 .

[71]  Roger Clarke,et al.  Understanding the drone epidemic , 2014, Comput. Law Secur. Rev..

[72]  Roger Clarke,et al.  The regulation of civilian drones' impacts on behavioural privacy , 2014, Comput. Law Secur. Rev..

[73]  Meng-Han Tsai,et al.  A review of rotorcraft Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) developments and applications in civil engineering , 2014 .

[74]  Jochen Teizer,et al.  Mobile 3D mapping for surveying earthwork projects using an Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) system , 2014 .

[75]  Guido Morgenthal,et al.  Quality Assessment of Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) Based Visual Inspection of Structures , 2014 .

[76]  C. Gunawardena.  COMPARISON OF EXISTING TECHNOLOGY ACCEPTANCE THEORIES AND MODELS TO SUGGEST A WELL IMPROVED THEORY/MODEL , 2014 .

[77]  Pedro Arias,et al.  Low-cost aerial unit for outdoor inspection of building façades , 2013 .

[78]  Lei Yuan,et al.  A cloud approach to unified lifecycle data management in architecture, engineering, construction and facilities management: Integrating BIMs and SNS , 2013, Adv. Eng. Informatics.

[79]  Saima Maqbool,et al.  Arising Issues In Wireless Sensor Networks: Current Proposals And Future Developments , 2013 .

[80]  Javier Irizarry,et al.  Usability assessment of drone technology as safety inspection tools , 2012, J. Inf. Technol. Constr..

[81]  T. Landes,et al.  Quality Assessment Of Geometric Façade Models Reconstructed From TLS Data , 2012 .

[82]  Chen-Ming Kuo,et al.  Unmanned Aircraft Systems for Remote Building Inspection and Monitoring , 2012 .

[83]  Nathan E Serrano,et al.  Autonomous quadrotor unmanned aerial vehicle for culvert inspection , 2011 .

[84]  Richard T. Watson,et al.  Task-technology fit for mobile locatable information systems , 2008, Decis. Support Syst..

[85]  Michael Antioco,et al.  Consumer adoption of technological innovations: Effects of psychological and functional barriers in a lack of content versus a presence of content situation , 2010 .

[86]  Jerome P. Lynch,et al.  A summary review of wireless sensors and sensor networks for structural health monitoring , 2006 .

[87]  Linda Butler,et al.  Extending citation analysis to non-source items , 2006, Scientometrics.

[88]  Billie F. Spencer,et al.  Risk monitoring of buildings with wireless sensor networks , 2005 .

[89]  E. Rogers,et al.  Diffusion of innovations , 1964, Encyclopedia of Sport Management.

[90]  Diane M. Strong,et al.  Extending the technology acceptance model with task-technology fit constructs , 1999, Inf. Manag..

[91]  Diane M. Strong,et al.  Supporting software maintenance with software engineering tools: A Computed task-technology fit analysis , 1998, J. Syst. Softw..

[92]  Ilze Zigurs,et al.  A Theory of Task/Technology Fit and Group Support Systems Effectiveness , 1998, MIS Q..

[93]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  The measurement of the impacts of the IIC on the end‐users: The survey , 1997 .

[94]  Dale L. Goodhue,et al.  The model underlying the measurement of the impacts of the IIC on the end‐users , 1997 .

[95]  Dale Goodhue,et al.  The Model Underlying the Measurement of the Impacts of the IIC on the End-Users , 1997, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[96]  Dale Goodhue,et al.  Understanding user evaluations of information systems , 1995 .

[97]  Dale Goodhue,et al.  Task-Technology Fit and Individual Performance , 1995, MIS Q..

[98]  James R. Jackson,et al.  Robotics in the Construction Industry , 1990 .