On phonetic convergence during conversational interaction.

Following research that found imitation in single-word shadowing, this study examines the degree to which interacting talkers increase similarity in phonetic repertoire during conversational interaction. Between-talker repetitions of the same lexical items produced in a conversational task were examined for phonetic convergence by asking a separate set of listeners to detect similarity in pronunciation across items in a perceptual task. In general, a listener judged a repeated item spoken by one talker in the task to be more similar to a sample production spoken by the talker's partner than corresponding pre- and postinteraction utterances. Both the role of a participant in the task and the sex of the pair of talkers affected the degree of convergence. These results suggest that talkers in conversational settings are susceptible to phonetic convergence, which can mark nonlinguistic functions in social discourse and can form the basis for phenomena such as accent change and dialect formation.

[1]  Jennifer S. Pardo,et al.  The Perception of Speech , 2006 .

[2]  Gautam K. Vallabha,et al.  Perceptuomotor bias in the imitation of steady-state vowels. , 2004, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[3]  M. Pickering,et al.  Toward a mechanistic psychology of dialogue , 2004, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[4]  Jennifer S. Pardo,et al.  Is alignment always the result of automatic priming? , 2004, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[5]  C. Fowler,et al.  Rapid access to speech gestures in perception: Evidence from choice and simple response time tasks. , 2003, Journal of memory and language.

[6]  Tamiko Azuma,et al.  Puzzle-solving science: the quixotic quest for units in speech perception , 2003, J. Phonetics.

[7]  Jeffery A. Jones,et al.  Learning to produce speech with an altered vocal tract: the role of auditory feedback. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[8]  Philip R. Cohen,et al.  Referring as a Collaborative Process , 2003 .

[9]  L. Nygaard,et al.  Gender Differences in Vocal Accommodation: , 2002 .

[10]  J. Perkell,et al.  Economy of effort in different speaking conditions. I. A preliminary study of intersubject differences and modeling issues. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[11]  Michael I. Jordan,et al.  Sensorimotor adaptation of speech I: Compensation and adaptation. , 2002, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[12]  Carlos Gussenhoven,et al.  Confluent talker- and listener-oriented forces in clear speech production , 2002 .

[13]  A. Bradlow.  Confluent talker- and listener-oriented forces in clear speech production , 2002 .

[14]  Peter Dennis Viechnicki.  Composition and granularity of vowel production targets , 2002 .

[15]  Jeffery A. Jones,et al.  Perceptual calibration of F0 production: evidence from feedback perturbation. , 2000, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[16]  Alexandra A. Cleland,et al.  Syntactic co-ordination in dialogue , 2000, Cognition.

[17]  L. Nygaard,et al.  The role of sentential prosody in learning voices , 2000 .

[18]  E. Bard,et al.  Controlling the Intelligibility of Referring Expressions in Dialogue , 2000 .

[19]  T. Chartrand,et al.  The chameleon effect: the perception-behavior link and social interaction. , 1999, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[20]  S. Goldinger.  Echoes of echoes? An episodic theory of lexical access. , 1998, Psychological review.

[21]  D. Pisoni,et al.  Recognizing Spoken Words: The Neighborhood Activation Model , 1998, Ear and hearing.

[22]  C. Fowler,et al.  Gestural drift in a bilingual speaker of Brazilian Portuguese and English , 1997 .

[23]  Carol A. Fowler,et al.  Reductions of Spoken Words in Certain Discourse Contexts , 1997 .

[24]  S. W. Gregory,et al.  A nonverbal signal in voices of interview partners effectively predicts communication accommodation and social status perceptions. , 1996, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[25]  S. Garrod,et al.  Conversation, co-ordination and convention: an empirical investigation of how groups establish linguistic conventions , 1994, Cognition.

[26]  Eleonora Blaauw,et al.  The contribution of prosodic boundary markers to the perceptual difference between read and spontaneous speech , 1994, Speech Commun..

[27]  R. Remez.  A guide to research on the perception of speech. , 1994 .

[28]  Matthew Flatt,et al.  PsyScope: An interactive graphic system for designing and controlling experiments in the psychology laboratory using Macintosh computers , 1993 .

[29]  Michael T. Turvey,et al.  Autonomous and Nonautonomous Dynamics of Coordinated Rhythmic Movements , 1992 .

[30]  Anne H. Anderson,et al.  The Hcrc Map Task Corpus , 1991 .

[31]  C. Browman.  Gestural structures : distinctiveness, phonological processes, and historical change , 1991 .

[32]  S. W. Gregory,et al.  Analysis of fundamental frequency reveals covariation in interview partners' speech , 1990 .

[33]  Björn Lindblom,et al.  Explaining Phonetic Variation: A Sketch of the H&H Theory , 1990 .

[34]  H. H. Clark,et al.  Understanding by addressees and overhearers , 1989, Cognitive Psychology.

[35]  Michael T. Turvey,et al.  Absolute Coordination: An Ecological Perspective§ , 1989 .

[36]  C. Fowler.  Differential Shortening of Repeated Content Words Produced in Various Communicative Contexts , 1988, Language and speech.

[37]  R. Krauss,et al.  Dominance and accommodation in the conversational behaviours of same- and mixed-gender dyads. , 1988 .

[38]  C. Fowler,et al.  Talkers' signaling of new and old. words in speech and listeners' perception and use of the distinction , 1987 .

[39]  Robert M. Krauss,et al.  The Role of the Listener: Addressee Influences on Message Formulation , 1987 .

[40]  Douglas L. Hintzman,et al.  "Schema Abstraction" in a Multiple-Trace Memory Model , 1986 .

[41]  H. H. Clark,et al.  Referring as a collaborative process , 1986, Cognition.

[42]  A. Liberman,et al.  The motor theory of speech perception revised , 1985, Cognition.

[43]  Sharon Hunnicutt,et al.  Intelligibility Versus Redundancy - Conditions of Dependency , 1985 .

[44]  J. Fodor.  The Modularity of mind. An essay on faculty psychology , 1986 .

[45]  F. X. Castellanos,et al.  Speech-production measures of speech perception: rapid shadowing of VCV syllables. , 1980, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[46]  Donald M. Taylor,et al.  Speech markers in social interaction , 1979 .

[47]  M. Natale.  CONVERGENCE OF MEAN VOCAL INTENSITY IN DYADIC COMMUNICATION AS A FUNCTION OF SOCIAL DESIRABILITY , 1975 .

[48]  H. Lane,et al.  The Lombard Sign and the Role of Hearing in Speech , 1971 .

[49]  R. Krauss,et al.  Changes in reference phrases as a function of frequency of usage in social interaction: a preliminary study , 1964 .