Mending metacognitive illusions: a comparison of mnemonic-based and theory-based procedures.

Previous research indicated that learners experience an illusion of competence during learning (termed foresight bias) because judgments of learning (JOLs) are made in the presence of information that will be absent at test. The authors examined the following 2 procedures for alleviating foresight bias: enhancing learners' sensitivity to mnemonic cues pertaining to ease of retrieval and inducing learners to resort to theory-based judgments as a basis for JOLs. Both procedures proved effective in mending metacognitive illusions-as reflected in JOLs and self-regulation of study time-but only theory-based debiasing yielded transfer to new items. The results support the notion that improved metacognition is 1 key to optimizing transfer but also that educating subjective experience does not guarantee generalization to new situations.

[1]  N. Schwarz.  Heuristics and Biases: Feelings as Information: Moods Influence Judgments and Processing Strategies , 2002 .

[2]  J. Dunlosky,et al.  Fluency of retrieval at study affects judgments of learning (JOLs): An analytic or nonanalytic basis for JOLs? , 2001, Memory & cognition.

[3]  Asher Koriat,et al.  The intricate relationships between monitoring and control in metacognition: lessons for the cause-and-effect relation between subjective experience and behavior. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[4]  Kerri L. Johnson,et al.  Why People Fail to Recognize Their Own Incompetence , 2003 .

[5]  John Dunlosky,et al.  Encoding fluency is a cue used for judgments about learning. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[6]  L. Reder,et al.  What determines initial feeling of knowing? Familiarity with question terms, not with the answer , 1992 .

[7]  Ian Begg,et al.  Memory predictions are based on ease of processing , 1989 .

[8]  R. Bjork,et al.  Illusions of competence in monitoring one's knowledge during study. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[9]  G. Salomon,et al.  The computer as a zone of proximal development: Internalizing reading-related metacognitions from a Reading Partner. , 1989 .

[10]  John Dunlosky,et al.  A revised methodology for research on metamemory: Pre-judgment Recall and Monitoring (PRAM). , 2004, Psychological methods.

[11]  Asher Koriat,et al.  Predicting one's own forgetting: the role of experience-based and theory-based processes. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[12]  Natika Newton,et al.  Metacognition and consciousness , 1995 .

[13]  Daniel L. Schwartz,et al.  Chapter 3: Rethinking Transfer: A Simple Proposal With Multiple Implications , 1999 .

[14]  A. Koriat,et al.  Comparing objective and subjective learning curves: judgments of learning exhibit increased underconfidence with practice. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[15]  Gavriel Salomon,et al.  T RANSFER OF LEARNING , 1992 .

[16]  F. Strack.  The different routes to social judgments: Experiential versus informational strategies , 1992 .

[17]  T. O. Nelson.  Consciousness and metacognition. , 1996 .

[18]  Asher Koriat,et al.  The Feeling of Knowing: Some Metatheoretical Implications for Consciousness and Control , 2000, Consciousness and Cognition.

[19]  Ann L. Brown,et al.  Reciprocal Teaching of Comprehension-Fostering and Comprehension-Monitoring Activities , 1984 .

[20]  K. Holyoak,et al.  Schema induction and analogical transfer , 1983, Cognitive Psychology.

[21]  Similarity between the Cue for Judgments of Learning (JOL) and the Cue for Test Is Not the Primary Determinant of JOL Accuracy , 1997 .

[22]  T. O. Nelson.  Metamemory: A Theoretical Framework and New Findings , 1990 .

[23]  T. O. Nelson,et al.  When People's Judgments of Learning (JOLs) are Extremely Accurate at Predicting Subsequent Recall: The “Delayed-JOL Effect” , 1991 .

[24]  Daniel L. Schwartz,et al.  Rethinking transfer: A simple proposal with multiple implica-tions , 1999 .

[25]  T. O. Nelson,et al.  Lack of pervasiveness of the underconfidence-with-practice effect: boundary conditions and an explanation via anchoring. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[26]  A. Koriat,et al.  Processes underlying metacognitive judgments: Information-based and experience-based monitoring of one's own knowledge. , 1999 .

[27]  Asher Koriat,et al.  Dissociating Knowing and the Feeling of Knowing : Further Evidence for the Accessibility Model , 2005 .

[28]  Asher Koriat,et al.  Illusions of competence during study can be remedied by manipulations that enhance learners’ sensitivity to retrieval conditions at test , 2006, Memory & cognition.

[29]  Wolfgang Schneider,et al.  Memory Development Between 2 and 20 , 1988 .

[30]  T. O. Nelson,et al.  Allocation of self-paced study time and the "labor-in-vain effect". , 1988, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[31]  Timothy D. Wilson,et al.  Thinking too much: introspection can reduce the quality of preferences and decisions. , 1991, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[32]  D. Lucangeli.  Specific and General Transfer Effects Following Metamemory Training. , 1995 .

[33]  Asher Koriat,et al.  The effects of encoding fluency and retrieval fluency on judgments of learning , 2005 .

[34]  S. Chaiken,et al.  Dual-process theories in social psychology , 1999 .

[35]  Michael J. Serra,et al.  Does retrieval fluency contribute to the underconfidence-with-practice effect? , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[36]  Xiaodong Lin,et al.  Supporting Learning of Variable Control in a Computer-Based Biology Environment: Effects of Prompting College Students to Reflect on Their Own Thinking , 1999 .

[37]  E. Thompson,et al.  The Cambridge Handbook of Consciousness , 2007 .

[38]  Kurt Lewin,et al.  The Research Center for Group Dynamics at Massachusetts Institute of Technology. , 1945 .

[39]  Pierre-Jean Marescaux,et al.  Metacognition : process, function and use , 2002 .

[40]  A. Koriat,et al.  Monitoring and control processes in the strategic regulation of memory accuracy. , 1996, Psychological review.

[41]  R. Bjork,et al.  The mismeasure of memory: when retrieval fluency is misleading as a metamnemonic index. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[42]  Thomas A. Schreiber,et al.  The University of South Florida free association, rhyme, and word fragment norms , 2004, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[43]  Asher Koriat,et al.  Exploring a mnemonic debiasing account of the underconfidence-with-practice effect. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[44]  David J. Therriault,et al.  Accuracy of metacognitive monitoring affects learning of texts. , 2003 .

[45]  Larry L. Jacoby,et al.  Illusions of immediate memory: evidence of an attributional basis for feelings of familiarity and perceptual quality , 1990 .

[46]  Erik De Corte,et al.  Transfer as the Productive Use of Acquired Knowledge, Skills, and Motivations: , 2003 .

[47]  Colleen M. Parks,et al.  Age-related equivalence and deficit in knowledge updating of cue effectiveness. , 2002, Psychology and aging.

[48]  D. Kahneman,et al.  Heuristics and Biases: The Psychology of Intuitive Judgment , 2002 .

[49]  Lisa K. Son,et al.  The relation between metacognitive monitoring and control , 2002 .

[50]  L. Jacoby,et al.  Adult Egocentrism: Subjective Experience versus Analytic Bases for Judgment , 1996 .

[51]  Robert Donmoyer,et al.  American Educational Research Association , 1992 .

[52]  T. O. Nelson,et al.  Multiple study trials and judgments of learning. , 2003, Acta psychologica.

[53]  T. O. Nelson,et al.  A comparison of current measures of the accuracy of feeling-of-knowing predictions , 1984 .

[54]  A. Koriat.  Monitoring one's own knowledge during study : A cue-utilization approach to judgments of learning , 1997 .

[55]  Richard E. Mayer,et al.  Problem-solving transfer. , 1996 .

[56]  C. Bray.  Transfer of learning. , 1928 .

[57]  A Koriat,et al.  How do we know that we know? The accessibility model of the feeling of knowing. , 1993, Psychological review.

[58]  Marlene Scardamalia,et al.  Teachability of Reflective Processes in Written Composition , 1984, Cogn. Sci..

[59]  L. Reder.  Implicit memory and metacognition , 1996 .

[60]  Ronald Lippitt,et al.  The research center for group dynamics , 1947 .

[61]  John Dunlosky,et al.  Does the Sensitivity of Judgments of Learning (JOLs) to the Effects of Various Study Activities Depend on When the JOLs Occur , 1994 .

[62]  Ann L. Brown,et al.  How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. , 1999 .

[63]  T. O. Nelson,et al.  Importance of the kind of cue for judgments of learning (JOL) and the delayed-JOL effect , 1992, Memory & cognition.

[64]  Eugene B. Zechmeister,et al.  Memory-monitoring accuracy as influenced by the distribution of retrieval practice , 1992 .

[65]  T. O. Nelson,et al.  A comparison of current measures of the accuracy of feeling-of-knowing predictions. , 1984, Psychological bulletin.

[66]  William L. Cull,et al.  The learning ability paradox in adult metamemory research: Where are the metamemory differences between good and poor learners? , 1994, Memory & cognition.

[67]  L. Brooks,et al.  Nonanalytic Cognition: Memory, Perception, and Concept Learning , 1984 .