The open kimono: How Intel balances trust and power to maintain platform leadership

A small group of companies including Intel, Microsoft, and Cisco have used "platform leadership" with great effect as a means for driving innovation and accelerating market growth within their respective industries. Prior research in this area emphasizes that trust plays a critical role in the success of this strategy. However, many of the categorizations of trust discussed in the literature tend to ignore or undervalue the fact that trust and power are often functionally equivalent, and that the coercion of weaker partners is sometimes misdiagnosed as collaboration. In this paper, I use case study data focusing on Intel's shift from ceramic/wire-bonded packaging to organic/C4 packaging to characterize the relationships between Intel and its suppliers, and to determine if these links are based on power in addition to trust. The case study shows that Intel's platform leadership strategy is built on a balance of both trust and a relatively benevolent form of power that is exemplified by the company's "open kimono" principle, through which Intel insists that suppliers share detailed financial data and highly proprietary technical information to achieve mutually advantageous objectives. By explaining more completely the nature of these inter-firm linkages, this paper usefully extends our understanding of how platform leadership is maintained by Intel, and contributes to the literature by showing how trust and power can be used simultaneously within an inter-firm relationship in a way that benefits all of the stakeholders.

[1]  J. Barney,et al.  Trustworthiness as a Source of Competitive Advantage , 1994 .

[2]  Bart Nooteboom,et al.  Innovation and inter-firm linkages: new implications for policy , 1999 .

[3]  Giorgos Zacharia,et al.  Trust management through reputation mechanisms , 2000, Appl. Artif. Intell..

[4]  Nirmalya Kumar,et al.  The power of trust in manufacturer-retailer relationships , 1996 .

[5]  S. Winter,et al.  The Nature of the Firm: Origins, Evolution, and Development , 1992 .

[6]  W. Hamilton,et al.  The Evolution of Cooperation , 1984 .

[7]  Andrew H. Van de Ven,et al.  Relying on Trust in Cooperative Inter-Organizational Relationships , 2006 .

[8]  T. Jick Mixing Qualitative and Quantitative Methods: Triangulation in Action. , 1979 .

[9]  K. Eisenhardt,et al.  Resource-based View of Strategic Alliance Formation: Strategic and Social Effects in Entrepreneurial Firms , 1996 .

[10]  Roderick M. Kramer,et al.  Organizational trust : a reader , 2006 .

[11]  J. H. Davis,et al.  An Integrative Model Of Organizational Trust , 1995 .

[12]  A. Giddens The Constitution of Society , 1985 .

[13]  Reinhard Bachmann,et al.  Trust and/or Power: Towards a Sociological Theory of Organizational Relationships , 2006 .

[14]  T. Das,et al.  Between Trust and Control: Developing Confidence in Partner Cooperation in Alliances , 1998 .

[15]  P. Blau Exchange and Power in Social Life , 1964 .

[16]  Paul J. Hart,et al.  Power and Trust: Critical Factors in the Adoption and Use of Electronic Data Interchange , 1997 .

[17]  Bart Nooteboom,et al.  The Trust Process in Organizations , 2003 .

[18]  Kirk Monteverde,et al.  You have printed the following article : Supplier Switching Costs and Vertical Integration in the Automobile Industry , 2007 .

[19]  Stephen Marsh,et al.  Formalising Trust as a Computational Concept , 1994 .

[20]  J. Habermas Theory of Communicative Action , 1981 .

[21]  Mitsuru Kodama,et al.  New knowledge creation through leadership-based strategic community—a case of new product development in IT and multimedia business fields , 2005 .

[22]  Andrew S. Grove,et al.  Only the Paranoid Survive: How to Exploit the Crisis Points that Challenge Every Company and Career , 1996 .

[23]  K. Eisenhardt Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[24]  N. Luhmann Trust and Power , 1979 .

[25]  K. Eisenhardt,et al.  The Art of Continuous Change : Linking Complexity Theory and Time-Paced Evolution in Relentlessly Shifting Organizations , 1997 .

[26]  Cynthia Hardy,et al.  THE NATURE OF UNOBTRUSIVE POWER , 1985 .

[27]  Mari Sako,et al.  Price, Quality and Trust: Inter-firm Relations in Britain and Japan , 1992 .

[28]  H. Chesbrough The Era of Open Innovation , 2003 .

[29]  T. Das,et al.  Trust, Control, and Risk in Strategic Alliances: An Integrated Framework , 2001 .

[30]  Reinhard Bachmann,et al.  Trust - Conceptual Aspects of a Complex Phenomenon , 1998 .

[31]  M. Tushman,et al.  Managing Strategic Innovation and Change: A Collection of Readings , 1996 .

[32]  A. Zaheer,et al.  Handbook of Trust Research , 2006 .

[33]  Daniel T. Jones,et al.  The machine that changed the world : based on the Massachusetts Institute of Technology 5-million dollar 5-year study on the future of the automobile , 1990 .

[34]  Allan Afuah,et al.  Innovation Management: Strategies, Implementation, and Profits , 1997 .

[35]  M. Foucault,et al.  The archeology of knowledge , 1995 .

[36]  Y. S. Brenner,et al.  “Make or buy”: the potential subversion of corporate strategy – the case of Philips , 1995 .

[37]  Ángeles Montoro-Sánchez,et al.  Determining factors in the success of R&D cooperative agreements between firms and research organizations , 2004 .

[38]  Malee V. Lucas,et al.  Architectural innovation in product development through early supplier integration , 1998 .

[39]  Robert Galford,et al.  The enemies of trust. , 2003, Harvard business review.

[40]  J. Ross,et al.  Beyond the Business Case: New Approaches to IT Investment , 2002 .

[41]  Alan Fox,et al.  Beyond Contract: Work, Power and Trust Relations , 1975 .

[42]  Pia Hurmelinna,et al.  Playing the collaboration game right—balancing trust and contracting , 2005 .

[43]  M. Dodgson Learning, Trust, and Technological Collaboration , 1993 .

[44]  R. Gephart Qualitative Research and the Academy of Management Journal , 2004 .

[45]  J. H. Dyer How Chrysler Created an American Keiretsu , 1996 .

[46]  Oliver E. Williamson,et al.  The Logic of Economic Organization , 1988 .

[47]  C. Lane,et al.  The Social Constitution of Trust: Supplier Relations in Britain and Germany , 1996 .

[48]  J. Barney How a Firm's Capabilities Affect Boundary Decisions , 1999 .

[49]  J. H. Davis,et al.  An integrative model of organizational trust, Academy of Management Review, : . , 1995 .

[50]  B. Wernerfelt,et al.  Technical change, competition and vertical integration , 1986 .

[51]  Marshall W. Meyer,et al.  Power in Organizations. , 1982 .

[52]  Sumantra Ghoshal,et al.  Building Competitive Advantage Through People , 2002 .

[53]  R. Bachmann Trust, Power and Control in Trans-Organizational Relations , 2001 .

[54]  Michael A. Cusumano,et al.  Platform Leadership How Intel, Microsoft, and Cisco Drive Industry Innovation , 2002 .

[55]  C. Lane,et al.  Trust within and between organizations : conceptual issues and empirical applications , 2000 .

[56]  Paul Trott,et al.  Innovation risks of strategic outsourcing , 2006 .

[57]  M. Sako Does Trust Improve Business Performance , 2002 .

[58]  Stewart Clegg,et al.  Frameworks of power , 1989 .

[59]  C. Mills,et al.  The Theory of Social and Economic Organization , 1948 .

[60]  Suresh Kotha,et al.  Continuous “Morphing”: Competing Through Dynamic Capabilities, Form, and Function , 2001 .

[61]  Jack R. Meredith,et al.  Building operations management theory through case and field research , 1998 .

[62]  Tim Minshall A RESOURCE-BASED VIEW OF ALLIANCES: THE CASE OF THE HANDHELD COMPUTER INDUSTRY , 1999 .

[63]  Richard Leifer,et al.  Radical Innovation: How Mature Companies Can Outsmart Upstarts , 2000 .

[64]  Linda D. Molm Coercive power in social exchange , 1997 .

[65]  G. Holton,et al.  HOW A SCIENTIFIC DISCOVERY IS MADE : A CASE HISTORY , 1996 .

[66]  A. Zaheer,et al.  Does Trust Matter? Exploring the Effectsof Interorganizational and Interpersonaltrust on Performance , 1998 .

[67]  D. Teece Competition, Cooperation, and Innovation Organizational Arrangements for Regimes of Rapid Technological Progress , 1992 .

[68]  P. Trott,et al.  Trust Risk And Control In The Management Of Collaborative Technology Development , 1999 .

[69]  A. Gawer,et al.  Platform Owner Entry and Innovation in Complementary Markets: Evidence from Intel , 2005 .

[70]  P. Bachrach,et al.  Two Faces of Power , 1962, American Political Science Review.

[71]  Joseph P. Cannon,et al.  Understanding the Influence of National Culture on the Development of Trust , 1998 .

[72]  M.A. Cusumano,et al.  The elements of platform leadership , 2003, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[73]  John Foster,et al.  Is there a role for transaction cost economics if we view firms as complex adaptive systems , 2000 .

[74]  D. Leonard-Barton,et al.  Wellsprings of Knowledge: Building and Sustaining the Sources of Innovation , 1995 .

[75]  C. Lane,et al.  Trust within and between organizations , 2000 .

[76]  Mary Ann Hazen,et al.  A Radical Humanist Perspective of Interorganizational Relationships , 1994 .

[77]  H. Willmott,et al.  NETWORKING AS KNOWLEDGE WORK: A STUDY OF STRATEGIC INTERORGANIZATIONAL DEVELOPMENT IN THE FINANCIAL SERVICES INDUSTRY* , 1993 .

[78]  M. Lombard,et al.  Content Analysis in Mass Communication: Assessment and Reporting of Intercoder Reliability , 2002 .

[79]  Jochen Streb Shaping the national system of inter-industry knowledge exchange: Vertical integration, licensing and repeated knowledge transfer in the German plastics industry☆ , 2003 .

[80]  Vincent Mangematin,et al.  Profile of public laboratories, industrial partnerships and organisation of R & D: the dynamics of industrial relationships in a large research organisation , 1996 .

[81]  A. Gawer,et al.  How Companies Become Platform Leaders , 2008 .

[82]  C. Hardy,et al.  Distinguishing Trust and Power in Interorganizational Relations: Forms and Façades of Trust , 1998 .

[83]  Mitsuru Kodama,et al.  Innovation through boundary management—a case study in reforms at Matsushita electric , 2007 .

[84]  Thomas Kern,et al.  Norm development in outsourcing relationships , 2002, J. Inf. Technol..

[85]  Amy K. Glasmeier,et al.  Technological discontinuities and flexible production networks: The case of Switzerland and the world watch industry * , 1991 .

[86]  Mitsuo Nagamachi,et al.  Supplier involvement in automotive component design: are there really large US Japan differences? , 1996 .

[87]  John Bessant,et al.  Managing Innovation: Integrating Technological, Market, and Organizational Change, 2nd Edition , 2001 .

[88]  Darrell Rigby,et al.  Open-market innovation. , 2002, Harvard business review.

[89]  S. Sitkin,et al.  Trust in the Balance: How Managers Integrate Trust-Building and Task Control , 2006 .

[90]  Matthew B. Miles,et al.  Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook , 1994 .

[91]  D. Teece Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy , 1993 .

[92]  R. Yin Case Study Research: Design and Methods , 1984 .

[93]  Joel West,et al.  How open is open enough?: Melding proprietary and open source platform strategies , 2003 .

[94]  Ali Daneshy A JPT Roundtable: The Funding and Uptake of New Upstream Technology , 2004 .

[95]  G. Brenkert,et al.  Trust, Morality and International Business , 1998, Business Ethics Quarterly.

[96]  T. Kumpe,et al.  Manufacturing: the new case for vertical integration , 1988 .

[97]  H. Gardner,et al.  Knowledge-Based Innovation: Emergence and Embedding of New Practice Areas in Management Consulting Firms , 2007 .