Investigation of strategies to achieve optimal DQE performance from indirect-detection active-matrix flat-panel imagers (AMFPIs) through novel pixel amplification architectures (Invited Paper)

The numerous merits of x-ray imagers based on active matrix, flat-panel array technology have led to their introduction in a wide variety of x-ray imaging applications. However, under certain conditions, the performance of direct and indirect detection AMFPIs is significantly limited by the relatively modest ratio of singal to noise provided by conventional systems. While substantial reduction in the additive noise of such systems is difficult, significant enhancement of signal can be achieved through the incorporation of an amplification circuit in each pixel. In addition, innovative photodiode structures can be incorporated into indirect detection designs to enhance optical signal collection efficiency. In this paper, an investigation of these strategies, involving the design, fabrication and performance evaluation of a variety of novel, small area, indirect detection arrays, is described. Each prototype array incorporates innovative features, such as continuous photodiodes and single-stage and dual-stage in-pixel amplifiers, that are designed to provide insight into promising avenues for achieving significant singal-to-noise enhancement. This information will assist in the realization of a next generation of highly-optimized AMFPI pixel architectures whose DQE performance will be limited only by x-ray noise and x-ray converter properties under a very wide range of conditions. In this paper, the design and operation of the present prototype arrays are described and initial performance results are reported. In addition, the benefits of significant improvements to the signal-to-noise properties of AMFPIs are illustrated through cascaded systems calculations of the DQE performance of hypothetical systems.

[1]  J Yorkston,et al.  Empirical investigation of the signal performance of a high-resolution, indirect detection, active matrix flat-panel imager (AMFPI) for fluoroscopic and radiographic operation. , 1997, Medical physics.

[2]  A Fenster,et al.  A spatial-frequency dependent quantum accounting diagram and detective quantum efficiency model of signal and noise propagation in cascaded imaging systems. , 1994, Medical physics.

[3]  J Yorkston,et al.  Demonstration of megavoltage and diagnostic x-ray imaging with hydrogenated amorphous silicon arrays. , 1992, Medical physics.

[4]  Berkman Sahiner,et al.  Digital indirect-detection x-ray imagers with microlens focusing: effects of Fresnel reflections from the microlens layer , 2003, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[5]  Denny L. Y. Lee.  Selenium detector with a grid for selenium charge gain , 2005, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[6]  Berkman Sahiner,et al.  Technique to improve the effective fill factor of digital mammographic imagers , 1998, Medical Imaging.

[7]  Kenkichi Tanioka,et al.  Indirect flat-panel detector with avalanche gain , 2004, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[8]  Richard L. Weisfield,et al.  High-resolution high fill factor a-Si:H sensor arrays for medical imaging , 1999, Medical Imaging.

[9]  Kanai S. Shah,et al.  Comparison of PbI2 and HgI2 for direct detection active matrix x-ray image sensors , 2002 .

[10]  Marcelo Mulato,et al.  Simulated and measured data-line parasitic capacitance of amorphous silicon large-area image sensor arrays , 2001 .

[11]  Robert A. Street,et al.  Pulsed laser crystallization of amorphous silicon for polysilicon flat panel imagers , 2002 .

[12]  Larry E. Antonuk,et al.  Evaluation of direct detection and indirect detection active matrix flat-panel imagers (AMFPIs) for digital mammography , 2001, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[13]  Kanai S. Shah,et al.  Improved properties of PbI2 x-ray imagers with tighter process control and using positive bias voltage , 2004, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[14]  Yi Wang,et al.  Systematic development of input-quantum-limited fluoroscopic imagers based on active-matrix flat-panel technology , 2004, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[15]  Qihua Zhao,et al.  System performance of a prototype flat-panel imager operated under mammographic conditions. , 2003, Medical physics.

[16]  Marietta Garmer,et al.  Digital chest radiography with a large-area flat-panel silicon X-ray detector: clinical comparison with conventional radiography , 2001, European Radiology.

[17]  J H Siewerdsen,et al.  Strategies to improve the signal and noise performance of active matrix, flat-panel imagers for diagnostic x-ray applications. , 2000, Medical physics.

[18]  Richard L. Weisfield,et al.  Performance analysis of a 127-micron pixel large-area TFT/photodiode array with boosted fill factor , 2004, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[19]  Yi Wang,et al.  Evaluation of novel direct- and indirect-detection active matrix flat-panel imagers (AMFPIs) for mammography , 2003, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[20]  Robert A. Street,et al.  Flat Panel Imagers Based on Excimer Laser Annealed, poly-Si Thin Film Transistor Technology , 2001 .

[21]  Larry Partain,et al.  Mercuric iodide medical imagers for low-exposure radiography and fluoroscopy , 2004, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[22]  Robert A. Street,et al.  Laser processing of amorphous silicon for large-area polysilicon imagers , 2001 .

[23]  Robert A. Street,et al.  Flat panel imagers with pixel level amplifiers based on polycrystalline silicon thin-film transistor technology , 2002 .

[24]  Robert A. Street,et al.  Laser Processing of Amorphous Silicon for Polysilicon Devices, Circuits and Flat-Panel Imagers , 2000 .

[25]  Arokia Nathan,et al.  Alternate pixel architectures for large-area medical imaging , 2001, SPIE Medical Imaging.