A Neural Marker of Costly Punishment Behavior

Human readiness to incur personal costs to punish norm violators is a key force in the maintenance of social norms. The willingness to punish is, however, characterized by vast individual heterogeneity that is poorly understood. In fact, this heterogeneity has so far defied explanations in terms of individual-level demographic or psychological variables. Here, we use resting electroencephalography, a stable measure of individual differences in cortical activity, to show that a highly specific neural marker—baseline cortical activity in the right prefrontal cortex—predicts individuals’ punishment behavior. The analysis of task-independent individual variation in cortical baseline activity provides a new window into the neurobiology of decision making by bringing dispositional neural markers to the forefront of the analysis.

[1]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  The Neural Basis of Economic Decision-Making in the Ultimatum Game , 2003, Science.

[2]  Nicholas G Martin,et al.  Common and specific genetic influences on EEG power bands delta, theta, alpha, and beta , 2007, Biological Psychology.

[3]  Á. Pascual-Leone,et al.  Studying the neurobiology of social interaction with transcranial direct current stimulation--the example of punishing unfairness. , 2008, Cerebral cortex.

[4]  R. E. Wheeler,et al.  Psychometric properties of resting anterior EEG asymmetry: temporal stability and internal consistency. , 1992, Psychophysiology.

[5]  Colin Camerer,et al.  “Economic man” in cross-cultural perspective: Behavioral experiments in 15 small-scale societies , 2005, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[6]  H. Jasper,et al.  Electrical Activity of the Brain , 1941 .

[7]  R D Pascual-Marqui,et al.  Standardized low-resolution brain electromagnetic tomography (sLORETA): technical details. , 2002, Methods and findings in experimental and clinical pharmacology.

[8]  L. J. Chapman,et al.  The measurement of handedness , 1987, Brain and Cognition.

[9]  D. Yarnitsky,et al.  Neurophysiology of the cortical pain network: revisiting the role of S1 in subjective pain perception via standardized low-resolution brain electromagnetic tomography (sLORETA). , 2008, Journal of Pain.

[10]  E. Stein,et al.  Right hemispheric dominance of inhibitory control: an event-related functional MRI study. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[11]  R. Robinson,et al.  Mechanism of disinhibition after brain lesions. , 1997, The Journal of nervous and mental disease.

[12]  Mascha van 't Wout,et al.  COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE AND NEUROPSYCHOLOGY NEUROREPORT Repetitive , 2005 .

[13]  Dietrich Lehmann,et al.  Tonic Activity Level in the Right Prefrontal Cortex Predicts Individuals' Risk Taking , 2009, Psychological science.

[14]  B. L. Miller,et al.  The influence of right frontotemporal dysfunction on social behavior in frontotemporal dementia , 2001, Neurology.

[15]  B. Kaada,et al.  Electrical activity of the brain. , 1953, Annual review of physiology.

[16]  T. Robbins,et al.  Stop-signal inhibition disrupted by damage to right inferior frontal gyrus in humans , 2003, Nature Neuroscience.

[17]  A. Kondacs,et al.  Long-term intra-individual variability of the background EEG in normals , 1999, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[18]  Marc Wildi,et al.  Test–retest reliability of resting EEG spectra validates a statistical signature of persons , 2007, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[19]  Lutz Jäncke,et al.  Brain activation during fast driving in a driving simulator: the role of the lateral prefrontal cortex , 2008, Neuroreport.

[20]  G. Comi,et al.  IFCN standards for digital recording of clinical EEG. International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. , 1998, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[21]  W M Herrmann,et al.  Reflections on the topics: EEG frequency bands and regulation of vigilance. , 1979, Pharmakopsychiatrie, Neuro-Psychopharmakologie.

[22]  Xiao-Li Meng,et al.  Comparing correlated correlation coefficients , 1992 .

[23]  R. Davidson What does the prefrontal cortex “do” in affect: perspectives on frontal EEG asymmetry research , 2004, Biological Psychology.

[24]  Á. Pascual-Leone,et al.  Diminishing Reciprocal Fairness by Disrupting the Right Prefrontal Cortex , 2006, Science.

[25]  Hawaii,et al.  Supporting Online Material Materials and Methods Figs. S1 to S6 Tables S1 and S2 Database S1 Antisocial Punishment across Societies , 2022 .

[26]  Colin Camerer Behavioral Game Theory: Experiments in Strategic Interaction , 2003 .

[27]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  The Relationship between Global and Local Changes in PET Scans , 1990, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[28]  D C Van Essen,et al.  'The surface management system' (SuMS) database: a surface-based database to aid cortical surface reconstruction, visualization and analysis. , 2001, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[29]  A. Heath,et al.  Genetic and environmental influences on frontal EEG asymmetry: A twin study , 2006, Biological Psychology.

[30]  M. Johannesson,et al.  Heritability of ultimatum game responder behavior , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[31]  Thomas E. Nichols,et al.  Nonparametric permutation tests for functional neuroimaging: A primer with examples , 2002, Human brain mapping.