Changes (but not differences) in motion direction fail to capture attention

In this study we investigated under what conditions motion direction changes pop out in continuously moving target/distractor environments. Participants were presented with vertically oriented Gabor patches whose carrier components drifted at a constant speed from left to right and then reversed direction. On any given trial, one of these elements was nominated as the target and the remaining elements were distractors. Distractor elements all changed direction simultaneously. The distractors either moved in a homogeneous manner (i.e. all moved in the same direction), or in a heterogeneous manner (i.e. direction was randomized). The target moved with a similar spatio-temporal trajectory as the distractors from left to right (or vice versa), but changed direction asynchronously with respect to the distracting elements. The participants' task was to locate this deviant (target) Gabor patch. We show that a motion direction change pops out (as indicated by the absence of a set size effect) when the surrounding distractors move in a homogeneous direction. When the distractors moved in heterogenous directions, a similar pop out effect was observed when the set size was small (≤5 elements), but not when it was large. This suggests that motion direction changes capture attention only when the change results in a unique direction of motion. Consistent with this finding we also show that a moving target (without direction change) captures attention in cases in which all distractors recently changed direction. This corroborates the idea that, in addition to direction cues, the temporal uniqueness of a change in an object's direction (or absence, thereof) relative to surrounding objects is a cue capable of capturing attention.

[1]  E. Van der Burg,et al.  Audiovisual events capture attention: evidence from temporal order judgments. , 2008, Journal of vision.

[2]  O Braddick,et al.  Visual Perception: Seeing motion signals in noise , 1995, Current Biology.

[3]  S. Yantis,et al.  Mechanisms of attentional priority. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[4]  P. Cavanagh,et al.  Tracking multiple targets with multifocal attention , 2005, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[5]  R. Abrams,et al.  The onset of receding motion captures attention: Comment on Franconeri and Simons (2003) , 2005, Perception & psychophysics.

[6]  D. Simons,et al.  The dynamic events that capture visual attention: A reply to Abrams and Christ (2005) , 2005, Perception & psychophysics.

[7]  D. Simons,et al.  Moving and looming stimuli capture attention , 2003, Perception & psychophysics.

[8]  Jan Theeuwes,et al.  On the limits of top-down control of visual selection , 2011, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[9]  J. Theeuwes Abrupt luminance change pops out; abrupt color change does not , 1995, Perception & psychophysics.

[10]  R. L. Valois,et al.  Vernier acuity with stationary moving Gabors , 1991, Vision Research.

[11]  E. Van der Burg,et al.  The role of spatial and nonspatial information in visual selection. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[12]  Edward Awh,et al.  The Capacity of Audiovisual Integration Is Limited to One Item , 2013, Psychological science.

[13]  J. Wolfe,et al.  What attributes guide the deployment of visual attention and how do they do it? , 2004, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[14]  M. Posner,et al.  Orienting of Attention* , 1980, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[15]  N. Cowan The magical number 4 in short-term memory: A reconsideration of mental storage capacity , 2001, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[16]  E. Vogel,et al.  PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE Research Article Visual Working Memory Represents a Fixed Number of Items Regardless of Complexity , 2022 .

[17]  A. Treisman,et al.  A feature-integration theory of attention , 1980, Cognitive Psychology.

[18]  Jan Theeuwes,et al.  Pip and pop: nonspatial auditory signals improve spatial visual search. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[19]  K. Nakayama,et al.  Sustained and transient components of focal visual attention , 1989, Vision Research.

[20]  R. Abrams,et al.  Motion Onset Captures Attention , 2003, Psychological science.

[21]  Jason M. Scimeca,et al.  Tracking Multiple Objects Is Limited Only by Object Spacing, Not by Speed, Time, or Capacity , 2010, Psychological science.

[22]  J. Duncan,et al.  Visual search and stimulus similarity. , 1989, Psychological review.

[23]  Edward K. Vogel,et al.  The capacity of visual working memory for features and conjunctions , 1997, Nature.

[24]  J. Theeuwes,et al.  Detecting the presence of a singleton involves focal attention , 2008, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[25]  R. D. Wright,et al.  Shifts of visual attention to multiple simultaneous location cues. , 1994, Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale.

[26]  Jay Pratt,et al.  It’s Alive! , 2010, Psychological science.

[27]  J. Theeuwes Top-down and bottom-up control of visual selection. , 2010, Acta psychologica.

[28]  P. McLeod,et al.  Motion coherence and conjunction search: Implications for guided search theory , 1992, Perception & psychophysics.

[29]  Christina J. Howard,et al.  Unexpected changes in direction of motion attract attention. , 2010, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[30]  J. Theeuwes Perceptual selectivity for color and form , 1992, Perception & psychophysics.

[31]  J. Theeuwes,et al.  Poke and pop: Tactile–visual synchrony increases visual saliency , 2009, Neuroscience Letters.

[32]  David Alais,et al.  Finding Flicker: Critical Differences in Temporal Frequency Capture Attention , 2011, Front. Psychology.

[33]  Jan Theeuwes,et al.  The role of cueing in attentional capture , 2008 .

[34]  Z W Pylyshyn,et al.  Tracking multiple independent targets: evidence for a parallel tracking mechanism. , 1988, Spatial vision.

[35]  S. Yantis,et al.  Uniqueness of abrupt visual onset in capturing attention , 1988, Perception & psychophysics.

[36]  Jan Theeuwes,et al.  On the limits of top-down control of visual selection , 2011, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[37]  Jan Theeuwes,et al.  Efficient Visual Search from Synchronized Auditory Signals Requires Transient Audiovisual Events , 2010, PloS one.