Independent Effects of Adaptation and Attention on Perceived Speed

Adaptation and attention are two mechanisms by which sensory systems manage limited bioenergetic resources: Whereas adaptation decreases sensitivity to stimuli just encountered, attention increases sensitivity to behaviorally relevant stimuli. In the visual system, these changes in sensitivity are accompanied by a change in the appearance of different stimulus dimensions, such as speed. Adaptation causes an underestimation of speed, whereas attention leads to an overestimation of speed. In the two experiments reported here, we investigated whether the effects of these mechanisms interact and how they affect the appearance of stimulus features. We tested the effects of adaptation and the subsequent allocation of attention on perceived speed. A quickly moving adaptor decreased the perceived speed of subsequent stimuli, whereas a slow adaptor did not alter perceived speed. Attention increased perceived speed regardless of the adaptation effect, which indicates that adaptation and attention affect perceived speed independently. Moreover, the finding that attention can alter perceived speed after adaptation indicates that adaptation is not merely a by-product of neuronal fatigue.

[1]  M. Carrasco,et al.  Exogenous attention and color perception: Performance and appearance of saturation and hue , 2006, Vision Research.

[2]  Marisa Carrasco,et al.  Feature-Based Attention Modulates Orientation-Selective Responses in Human Visual Cortex , 2007, Neuron.

[3]  F A Wichmann,et al.  Ning for Helpful Comments and Suggestions. This Paper Benefited Con- Siderably from Conscientious Peer Review, and We Thank Our Reviewers the Psychometric Function: I. Fitting, Sampling, and Goodness of Fit , 2001 .

[4]  M. Carrasco,et al.  Transient covert attention does alter appearance: A reply to Schneider (2006) , 2007, Perception & psychophysics.

[5]  P. Lennie,et al.  Pattern-selective adaptation in visual cortical neurones , 1979, Nature.

[6]  Marisa Carrasco,et al.  Cue contrast modulates the effects of exogenous attention on appearance , 2009, Vision Research.

[7]  D. Burr,et al.  Motion psychophysics: 1985–2010 , 2011, Vision Research.

[8]  M. Webster Adaptation and visual coding. , 2011, Journal of vision.

[9]  Wei Ji Ma,et al.  Bayesian inference with probabilistic population codes , 2006, Nature Neuroscience.

[10]  H. Seung,et al.  Tilt aftereffect and adaptation-induced changes in orientation tuning in visual cortex. , 2005, Journal of neurophysiology.

[11]  Viola S. Störmer,et al.  Cross-modal cueing of attention alters appearance and early cortical processing of visual stimuli , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[12]  M. Turatto,et al.  Attention makes moving objects be perceived to move faster , 2007, Vision Research.

[13]  W. Newsome,et al.  Correlation between Speed Perception and Neural Activity in the Middle Temporal Visual Area , 2005, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[14]  R. Blake,et al.  Neural strength of visual attention gauged by motion adaptation , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.

[15]  M. Carrasco,et al.  How do attention and adaptation affect contrast sensitivity? , 2007, Journal of vision.

[16]  Peter Thompson,et al.  Velocity after-effects: The effects of adaptation to moving stimuli on the perception of subsequently seen moving stimuli , 1981, Vision Research.

[17]  D H Brainard,et al.  The Psychophysics Toolbox. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[18]  Marisa Carrasco,et al.  Attention improves or impairs visual performance by enhancing spatial resolution , 1998, Nature.

[19]  M. Carrasco,et al.  Transient covert attention and the perceived rate of flicker. , 2006, Journal of vision.

[20]  M. Carrasco,et al.  Spatial covert attention increases contrast sensitivity across the CSF: support for signal enhancement , 2000, Vision Research.

[21]  C. Blakemore,et al.  The perceived spatial frequency shift: evidence for frequency‐selective neurones in the human brain , 1970, The Journal of physiology.

[22]  D G Pelli,et al.  The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[23]  John H. R. Maunsell,et al.  Effects of spatial attention on contrast response functions in macaque area V4. , 2006, Journal of neurophysiology.

[24]  S J Luck,et al.  Effects of spatial cuing on luminance detectability: psychophysical and electrophysiological evidence for early selection. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[25]  Eero P. Simoncelli,et al.  Implicit encoding of prior probabilities in optimal neural populations , 2010, NIPS.

[26]  Angelika Lingnau,et al.  Speed encoding in human visual cortex revealed by fMRI adaptation. , 2009, Journal of vision.

[27]  P. Lennie The Cost of Cortical Computation , 2003, Current Biology.

[28]  M. Carrasco,et al.  Attention alters the appearance of motion coherence , 2006, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[29]  Edward H. Adelson,et al.  Motion illusions as optimal percepts , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.

[30]  M. Carrasco,et al.  On the automaticity and flexibility of covert attention: a speed-accuracy trade-off analysis. , 2009, Journal of vision.

[31]  Kun Guo,et al.  I Know You are Beautiful Even without Looking at You: Discrimination of Facial Beauty in Peripheral Vision , 2011, Perception.

[32]  Diane M. Beck,et al.  Top-down and bottom-up mechanisms in biasing competition in the human brain , 2009, Vision Research.

[33]  Jing Liu,et al.  Functional organization of speed tuned neurons in visual area MT. , 2003, Journal of neurophysiology.

[34]  S. Treue,et al.  Attentional Modulation Strength in Cortical Area MT Depends on Stimulus Contrast , 2002, Neuron.

[35]  R. Desimone,et al.  Attention Increases Sensitivity of V4 Neurons , 2000, Neuron.

[36]  Bart Krekelberg,et al.  Adaptation in macaque MT reduces perceived speed and improves speed discrimination. , 2006, Journal of neurophysiology.

[37]  A. Kohn Visual adaptation: physiology, mechanisms, and functional benefits. , 2007, Journal of neurophysiology.

[38]  M. Carrasco,et al.  PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE Research Article Voluntary Attention Enhances Contrast Appearance , 2022 .

[39]  Stefan Treue,et al.  Attention changes perceived size of moving visual patterns. , 2007, Journal of vision.

[40]  A. T. Smith,et al.  Velocity coding: Evidence from perceived velocity shifts , 1985, Vision Research.

[41]  M. Carrasco,et al.  Attention trades off spatial acuity , 2009, Vision Research.

[42]  Yun-Xian Ho,et al.  How Attention Enhances Spatial Resolution: Evidence from Selective Adaptation to Spatial Frequency P343 Cv Jp Dj , 2022 .

[43]  M. Carrasco Visual attention: The past 25 years , 2011, Vision Research.

[44]  M. Carrasco,et al.  Attention alters appearance , 2004, Nature Neuroscience.

[45]  Jared Abrams,et al.  Voluntary attention increases perceived spatial frequency , 2010, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[46]  P Thompson,et al.  Motion psychophysics. , 1993, Reviews of oculomotor research.

[47]  M. Carrasco,et al.  Evaluating comparative and equality judgments in contrast perception: attention alters appearance. , 2010, Journal of vision.

[48]  Nicholas J. Priebe,et al.  The Neural Representation of Speed in Macaque Area MT/V5 , 2003, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[49]  Frans A. J. Verstraten,et al.  Attentional modulation of adaptation to two-component transparent motion , 1995, Vision Research.

[50]  Marisa Carrasco,et al.  Attention speeds processing across eccentricity: Feature and conjunction searches , 2006, Vision Research.

[51]  J. Victor,et al.  Attentional modulation of adaptation in V4 , 2009, The European journal of neuroscience.

[52]  I. Ohzawa,et al.  Contrast gain control in the cat visual cortex , 1982, Nature.

[53]  R. Sekuler,et al.  Adaptation alters perceived direction of motion , 1976, Vision Research.

[54]  Endogenous attention optimizes spatial resolution depending on task demands , 2011 .

[55]  J. Reynolds,et al.  Attentional modulation of visual processing. , 2004, Annual review of neuroscience.

[56]  Marisa Carrasco,et al.  Feature-based attention modulates orientation-selective responses in human visual cortex , 2010 .

[57]  D. Heeger,et al.  When size matters: attention affects performance by contrast or response gain , 2010, Nature Neuroscience.

[58]  Marisa Carrasco,et al.  When sustained attention impairs perception , 2006, Nature Neuroscience.

[59]  M. Carrasco,et al.  Attention Alters the Appearance of Spatial Frequency and Gap Size , 2005, Psychological science.

[60]  B. Dosher,et al.  External noise distinguishes attention mechanisms , 1998, Vision Research.

[61]  S. Treue Climbing the cortical ladder from sensation to perception , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.