Body schematics: On the role of the body schema in embodied lexical–semantic representations

Words denoting manipulable objects activate sensorimotor brain areas, likely reflecting action experience with the denoted objects. In particular, these sensorimotor lexical representations have been found to reflect the way in which an object is used. In the current paper we present data from two experiments (one behavioral and one neuroimaging) in which we investigate whether body schema information, putatively necessary for interacting with functional objects, is also recruited during lexical processing. To this end, we presented participants with words denoting objects that are typically brought towards or away from the body (e.g., cup or key, respectively). We hypothesized that objects typically brought to a location on the body (e.g., cup) are relatively more reliant on body schema representations, since the final goal location of the cup (i.e., the mouth) is represented primarily through posture and body co-ordinates. In contrast, objects typically brought to a location away from the body (e.g., key) are relatively more dependent on visuo-spatial representations, since the final goal location of the key (i.e., a keyhole) is perceived visually. The behavioral study showed that prior planning of a movement along an axis towards and away from the body facilitates processing of words with a congruent action semantic feature (i.e., preparation of movement towards the body facilitates processing of cup.). In an fMRI study we showed that words denoting objects brought towards the body engage the resources of brain areas involved in the processing information about human bodies (i.e., the extra-striate body area, middle occipital gyrus and inferior parietal lobe) relatively more than words denoting objects typically brought away from the body. The results provide converging evidence that body schema are implicitly activated in processing lexical information.

[1]  Friedemann Pulvermüller,et al.  Reading cinnamon activates olfactory brain regions , 2006, NeuroImage.

[2]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  The Cortical Motor System , 2001, Neuron.

[3]  S. Aglioti,et al.  The body in the brain: neural bases of corporeal awareness , 1997, Trends in Neurosciences.

[4]  W. Singer,et al.  Cortical responses to self and others , 2009, Human brain mapping.

[5]  A. Maravita,et al.  Tools for the body (schema) , 2004, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[6]  T. Vilis,et al.  Integration of target and effector information in human posterior parietal cortex for the planning of action. , 2005, Journal of neurophysiology.

[7]  Loukia D. Loukopoulos,et al.  Planning reaches by evaluating stored postures. , 1995, Psychological review.

[8]  Nicholas P. Holmes,et al.  The body schema and multisensory representation(s) of peripersonal space , 2004, Cognitive Processing.

[9]  Amanda L. Kaas,et al.  Distinct cortical networks for the detection and identification of human body , 2009, NeuroImage.

[10]  Suzanna Becker,et al.  A Principle for Learning Egocentric-Allocentric Transformation , 2008, Neural Computation.

[11]  F. Pulvermüller Brain reflections of words and their meaning , 2001, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[12]  J. Hart,et al.  Distinct prefrontal cortex activity associated with item memory and source memory for visual shapes. , 2003, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[13]  Pasquale A. Della Rosa,et al.  The impact of semantic reference on word class: An fMRI study of action and object naming , 2006, NeuroImage.

[14]  L. Barsalou Grounded cognition. , 2008, Annual review of psychology.

[15]  G. Holmes,et al.  Sensory disturbances from cerebral lesions , 1911 .

[16]  R. Andersen Encoding of intention and spatial location in the posterior parietal cortex. , 1995, Cerebral cortex.

[17]  Rolf A. Zwaan,et al.  Seeing, acting, understanding: motor resonance in language comprehension. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[18]  C. Spence,et al.  Multisensory integration and the body schema: close to hand and within reach , 2003, Current Biology.

[19]  M. Corbetta,et al.  Extrastriate body area in human occipital cortex responds to the performance of motor actions , 2004, Nature Neuroscience.

[20]  Alison J. Wiggett,et al.  Functional MRI analysis of body and body part representations in the extrastriate and fusiform body areas. , 2007, Journal of neurophysiology.

[21]  M. Arbib,et al.  Tool use and the distalization of the end-effector , 2009, Psychological research.

[22]  F. Donders,et al.  For Review Only The Function of Words: Distinct neural correlates for words denoting differently manipulable objects , 2009 .

[23]  A. Meltzoff,et al.  An fMRI study of imitation: action representation and body schema , 2005, Neuropsychologia.

[24]  M. Tanaka,et al.  Coding of modified body schema during tool use by macaque postcentral neurones. , 1996, Neuroreport.

[25]  R. Ellis,et al.  Action priming by briefly presented objects. , 2004, Acta psychologica.

[26]  I. Johnsrude,et al.  Somatotopic Representation of Action Words in Human Motor and Premotor Cortex , 2004, Neuron.

[27]  Alex Martin,et al.  Grounding Object Concepts in Perception and Action: Evidence from FMRI Studies of Tools , 2007, Cortex.

[28]  Michael P. Kaschak,et al.  Grounding language in action , 2002, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[29]  Michael P. Kaschak,et al.  The Action-Sentence Compatibility Effect: It's All in the Timing , 2006, Cogn. Sci..

[30]  Marc Jeannerod,et al.  Cross-talk between Language Processes and Overt Motor Behavior in the First 200 msec of Processing , 2006, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[31]  Ivan Toni,et al.  Cerebral correlates of motor imagery of normal and precision gait , 2008, NeuroImage.

[32]  Joana C Carmo,et al.  Neuropsychological perspectives on the mechanisms of imitation , 2009, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[33]  Nick F. Ramsey,et al.  Interactions between ego- and allocentric neuronal representations of space , 2006, NeuroImage.

[34]  Rolf A. Zwaan,et al.  Embodied Language: A Review of the Role of the Motor System in Language Comprehension , 2008, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[35]  Julie C. Sedivy,et al.  Playing on the typewriter, typing on the piano: manipulation knowledge of objects , 2006, Cognition.

[36]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  Improved Assessment of Significant Activation in Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI): Use of a Cluster‐Size Threshold , 1995, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[37]  Angela D. Friederici,et al.  Comprehending Prehending: Neural Correlates of Processing Verbs with Motor Stems , 2007, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[38]  Vittorio Gallese,et al.  Listening to Action-related Sentences Activates Fronto-parietal Motor Circuits , 2005, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[39]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  The Human Body , 2001 .

[40]  G. Fink,et al.  What Is the Position of an Arm Relative to the Body? Neural Correlates of Body Schema and Body Structural Description , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[41]  George S. Cree,et al.  Evocation of functional and volumetric gestural knowledge by objects and words , 2008, Cognition.

[42]  Gereon R. Fink,et al.  Functional Interactions during the Retrieval of Conceptual Action Knowledge: An fMRI Study , 2007, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[43]  Daniel N. Bub,et al.  Language-Based Access to Gestural Components of Conceptual Knowledge , 2008, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[44]  Alex Martin,et al.  Representation of Manipulable Man-Made Objects in the Dorsal Stream , 2000, NeuroImage.