Implications of automated vehicles for accessibility and location choices: Evidence from an expert-based experiment

In this paper, possible accessibility impacts of fully automated vehicles (AVs) are explored. A conceptual framework for those impacts is developed based on the model of four accessibility components (i.e. land use, transport, temporal and individual) of Geurs and van Wee (2004). Q-method is applied among a sample of seventeen international accessibility experts to explore heterogeneity among experts with respect to the impacts of AVs on accessibility, and study different views and clusters of experts. Q-method statements are deductively categorized according to four accessibility components of the conceptual framework. Three viewpoints were extracted, indicating that experts expect AVs to influence accessibility through all four accessibility components. Viewpoint A expects that accessibility benefits stemming from AVs will be highly uncertain, mainly because of induced travel demand that will likely cancel out travel time and cost savings of AVs in the long term. Viewpoint B anticipates that accessibility changes because of AVs will have two opposing implications for urban form: densification of city center and further urban sprawl. Finally, viewpoint C expects that those who can afford an AV will mainly enjoy AVs benefits, thus AVs will have more negative than positive implications for social equity.

[1]  Emilio Frazzoli,et al.  Toward a Systematic Approach to the Design and Evaluation of Automated Mobility-on-Demand Systems: A Case Study in Singapore , 2014 .

[2]  Kay W. Axhausen,et al.  Autonomous Vehicle Fleet Sizes Required to Serve Different Levels of Demand , 2016 .

[3]  R. Zakharenko.  Self-Driving Cars Will Change Cities , 2015 .

[4]  Bert van Wee,et al.  Accessibility evaluation of land-use and transport strategies: review and research directions , 2004 .

[5]  F. Rajé,et al.  Using Q methodology to develop more perceptive insights on transport and social inclusion , 2007 .

[6]  Kara M. Kockelman,et al.  The Travel and Environmental Implications of Shared Autonomous Vehicles, Using Agent-Based Model Scenarios , 2014 .

[7]  Kara M. Kockelman,et al.  Operations of a Shared, Autonomous Electric Vehicle Fleet: Implications of Vehicle & Charging Infrastructure Decisions , 2016 .

[8]  P. Stenner,et al.  Doing Q methodology: theory, method and interpretation , 2005 .

[9]  Christian Rammel,et al.  Evolutionary policies for sustainable development: adaptive flexibility and risk minimising , 2003 .

[10]  Kara M. Kockelman,et al.  Dynamic ride-sharing and fleet sizing for a system of shared autonomous vehicles in Austin, Texas , 2018 .

[11]  Brice G. Nichols,et al.  Using an Activity-Based Model to Explore Possible Impacts of Automated Vehicles , 2015 .

[12]  Wenwen Zhang,et al.  Exploring the impact of shared autonomous vehicles on urban parking demand: An agent-based simulation approach , 2015 .

[13]  E. Papa,et al.  Sustainable Accessibility and the Implementation of Automated Vehicles: Identifying Critical Decisions , 2018 .

[14]  V. Marchau,et al.  The impact of intelligent transport systems on office location attractiveness: testing the predictive validity of a location choice model , 2013 .

[15]  Bart van Arem,et al.  Vehicle automation and transport system performance , 2016 .

[16]  John S. Dryzek,et al.  Handle with Care: The Deadly Hermeneutics of Deliberative Instrumentation , 2005 .

[17]  Intelligent Transport Systems and Preferences for Office Locations , 2008 .

[18]  Bart van Arem,et al.  Solving the User Optimum Privately Owned Automated Vehicles Assignment Problem (UO-POAVAP): A model to explore the impacts of self-driving vehicles on urban mobility , 2016 .

[19]  Bart van Arem,et al.  Policy and society related implications of automated driving: A review of literature and directions for future research , 2017, J. Intell. Transp. Syst..

[20]  B. Wee.  Accessible accessibility research challenges , 2016 .

[21]  Eva Fraedrich,et al.  Autonomous driving, the built environment and policy implications , 2019, Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice.

[22]  Itf.  Urban Mobility System Upgrade , 2015 .

[23]  B. van Arem,et al.  Development and transport implications of automated vehicles in the Netherlands: scenarios for 2030 and 2050 , 2017, European Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research.

[24]  Stephen D. Boyles,et al.  Effects of Autonomous Vehicle Ownership on Trip, Mode, and Route Choice , 2015 .