Modeling of the muscle/tendon excursions and moment arms in the thumb using the commercial software anybody.

A biomechanical model of a thumb would be useful for exploring the mechanical loadings in the musculoskeletal system, which cannot be measured in vivo. The purpose of the current study is to develop a practical kinematic thumb model using the commercial software Anybody (Anybody Technology, Aalborg, Denmark), which includes real CT-scans of the bony sections and realistic tendon/muscle attachments on the bones. The thumb model consists of a trapezium, a metacarpal bone, a proximal and a distal phalanx. These four bony sections are linked via three joints, i.e., IP (interphalangeal), MP (metacarpophalangeal) and CMC (carpometacarpal) joints. Nine muscles were included in the proposed model. The theoretically calculated moment arms of the tendons are compared with the corresponding experimental data by Smutz et al. [1998. Mechanical advantage of the thumb muscles. J. Biomech. 31(6), 565-570]. The predicted muscle moment arms of the majority of the muscle/tendon units agree well with the experimental data in the entire range of motion. Close to the end of the motion range, the predicted moment arms of several muscles (i.e., ADPt and ADPo (transverse and oblique heads of the adductor pollicis, respectively) muscles for CMC abduction/adduction and ADPt and FPB (flexor pollicis brevis) muscle for MP extension/flexion) deviate from the experimental data. The predicted moment potentials for all muscles are consistent with the experimental data. The findings thus suggest that, in a biomechanical model of the thumb, the mechanical functions of muscle-tendon units with small physiological cross-sectional areas (PCSAs) can be well represented using single strings, while those with large PCSAs (flat-wide attachments, e.g., ADPt and ADPo) can be represented by the averaged excursions of two strings. Our results show that the tendons with large PCSAs can be well represented biomechanically using the proposed approach in the major range of motion.

[1]  K N An,et al.  Normative model of human hand for biomechanical analysis. , 1979, Journal of biomechanics.

[2]  Scott L. Delp,et al.  A Model of the Upper Extremity for Simulating Musculoskeletal Surgery and Analyzing Neuromuscular Control , 2005, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[3]  P. Brand,et al.  Relative tension and potential excursion of muscles in the forearm and hand. , 1981, The Journal of hand surgery.

[4]  W P Cooney,et al.  Opposition of the thumb: an anatomic and biomechanical study of tendon transfers. , 1984, The Journal of hand surgery.

[5]  Joseph D. Towles,et al.  Towards a realistic biomechanical model of the thumb: the choice of kinematic description may be more critical than the solution method or the variability/uncertainty of musculoskeletal parameters. , 2003, Journal of biomechanics.

[6]  Internal stabilization in the thumb. , 1982, The Journal of hand surgery.

[7]  Kai Nan An,et al.  Quantitative analysis of the intrinsic muscles of the hand , 1991 .

[8]  F. Kolb,et al.  Reconstruction of a Metacarpophalangeal Pulley in the Thumb with a Free Extensor Retinaculum Graft , 1997, Journal of hand surgery.

[9]  K. An,et al.  Mechanical advantage of the thumb muscles. , 1998, Journal of biomechanics.

[10]  M. Ikeda,et al.  Reconstructive procedure to repair chronic injuries to the collateral ligament of metacarpophalangeal joints of the hand. , 2003, Hand surgery : an international journal devoted to hand and upper limb surgery and related research : journal of the Asia-Pacific Federation of Societies for Surgery of the Hand.

[11]  Walter Herzog,et al.  Theoretical Models of Skeletal Muscle: Biological and Mathematical Considerations , 1998 .

[12]  F. Werner,et al.  A biomechanical modeling of injury, repair, and rehabilitation of ulnar collateral ligament injuries of the thumb. , 2004, The Journal of hand surgery.