Quantitative effects of GABA and bicuculline methiodide on receptive field properties of neurons in real and simulated whisker barrels.

1. Carbon fiber multibarrel glass microelectrodes were used to record extracellular single-unit activity during microiontophoretic application of gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) or bicuculline methiodide (BMI) onto layer IV barrel neurons in the somatosensory cortex of fentanyl-sedated rats. Excitatory and inhibitory aspects of the neurons' receptive fields were quantified with the use of controlled whisker stimuli. The principally activating whisker and one of its immediately adjacent neighbors were deflected alone or in paired combinations involving a condition-test paradigm. 2. Units were distinguished electrophysiologically on the basis of the time course of their action potential waveforms. Data were obtained from 26 regular-spike units (RSUs; presumed spiny stellate cells) and 7 fast-spike units (FSUs; presumed GABAergic neurons). An average of 15.0 nA of GABA produced a one-third to one-half reduction in RSU responses evoked by the maximally effective stimulus. An average of 8.7 nA of BMI was needed to counteract this reduction. This amount of BMI, in the absence of exogenous GABA, was found to increase average RSU and FSU responses by 98 and 53%, respectively, relative to predrug levels. 3. For RSUs, the BMI-induced twofold increase in responses evoked by moving the principal whisker at the neuron's best deflection angle was accompanied by an almost threefold increase in responses evoked by similarly moving an adjacent whisker. Disproportionately large percentage increases were also seen for responses to nonpreferred directions of principal and adjacent whisker movement. BMI thus effectively increased receptive field size and decreased angular tuning. Similarly, responses to stimulus offsets, which are normally smaller than ON responses, were increased proportionally more. 4. Predrug responses of FSUs were more vigorous than those of RSUs. However, FSUs showed a similar inverse relationship between percentage increase with BMI and initial response magnitude, although the proportional increases were less pronounced. 5. GABA, like BMI, had the greatest proportional effects on those responses that were initially smallest. It produced results opposite those of BMI, effectively decreasing receptive field size and sharpening angular tuning. 6. A previously described computational model of a barrel was tested for its ability to reproduce quantitatively the effects of BMI and GABA. The application of BMI was simulated by decreasing the strength of the inhibitory inputs onto the particular cell under study in the model network. GABA microiontophoresis was simulated by adding a constant hyperpolarizing voltage. The model RSUs and FSUs displayed proportional changes in response magnitude that were quantitatively similar to those of their biological counterparts. 7. Surround inhibition was greatly attenuated by BMI application, both for the real and simulated barrel neurons. Disinhibition was less pronounced for the former, perhaps because, unlike the simulated neurons, they also possess GABAB receptors, which are unaffected by BMI. 8. We conclude that the inhibitory receptive field properties of barrel neurons can be explained by intrabarrel inhibition and that the expansion of receptive field size and loss of angular tuning with BMI is due to an enhanced effectiveness of convergent, multi-whisker thalamocortical input. Examination of the model neurons' behavior suggests that the altered activity in response to GABA or BMI application, respectively, can be explained by the nonlinear effects of shifting somal membrane potential away from or toward the neuron's firing threshold.

[1]  D. Simons,et al.  Responses of rat trigeminal ganglion neurons to movements of vibrissae in different directions. , 1990, Somatosensory & motor research.

[2]  E P Gardner,et al.  Temporal integration of multiple-point stimuli in primary somatosensory cortical receptive fields of alert monkeys. , 1980, Journal of neurophysiology.

[3]  D. McCormick,et al.  Comparative electrophysiology of pyramidal and sparsely spiny stellate neurons of the neocortex. , 1985, Journal of neurophysiology.

[4]  D. Simons,et al.  Thalamocortical response transformation in the rat vibrissa/barrel system. , 1989, Journal of neurophysiology.

[5]  M. Armstrong‐James,et al.  A method for etching the tips of carbon fibre microelectrodes , 1980, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[6]  D. Whitteridge,et al.  An intracellular analysis of the visual responses of neurones in cat visual cortex. , 1991, The Journal of physiology.

[7]  B. Connors,et al.  Correlation between intrinsic firing patterns and thalamocortical synaptic responses of neurons in mouse barrel cortex , 1992, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[8]  A Keller,et al.  Synaptic organization of GABAergic neurons in the mouse SmI cortex , 1987, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[9]  D. Ferster Origin of orientation-selective EPSPs in simple cells of cat visual cortex , 1987, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[10]  D. Ferster Orientation selectivity of synaptic potentials in neurons of cat primary visual cortex , 1986, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[11]  D. Simons,et al.  Functional organization in mouse barrel cortex , 1979, Brain Research.

[12]  M Sur,et al.  The arbors of axons terminating in middle cortical layers of somatosensory area 3b in owl monkeys. , 1989, Somatosensory & motor research.

[13]  P. Andersen,et al.  Two different responses of hippocampal pyramidal cells to application of gamma‐amino butyric acid. , 1980, The Journal of physiology.

[14]  A. Keller Synaptic Organization of the Barrel Cortex , 1995 .

[15]  C. Welker Receptive fields of barrels in the somatosensory neocortex of the rat , 1976, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[16]  I. Divac Cortical circuits: Synaptic organization of the cerebral cortex. Structure, function and theory by Edward L. White, Birkäuser, 1989. Sw. fr. 88.00 (xvi + 223 pages) ISBN 3 7643 3402 9 , 1990, Trends in Neurosciences.

[17]  Y. Kawaguchi,et al.  Groupings of nonpyramidal and pyramidal cells with specific physiological and morphological characteristics in rat frontal cortex. , 1993, Journal of neurophysiology.

[18]  A. Sillito The contribution of inhibitory mechanisms to the receptive field properties of neurones in the striate cortex of the cat. , 1975, The Journal of physiology.

[19]  E P Gardner,et al.  Spatial integration of multiple-point stimuli in primary somatosensory cortical receptive fields of alert monkeys. , 1980, Journal of Neurophysiology.

[20]  J. S. McCasland,et al.  Functional asymmetries in the rodent barrel cortex. , 1991, Somatosensory & motor research.

[21]  D J Simons,et al.  OFF response transformations in the whisker/barrel system. , 1994, Journal of neurophysiology.

[22]  D. Simons Multi-whisker stimulation and its effects on vibrissa units in rat Sml barrel cortex , 1983, Brain Research.

[23]  R. Dykes,et al.  Functional role of GABA in cat primary somatosensory cortex: shaping receptive fields of cortical neurons. , 1984, Journal of neurophysiology.

[24]  D. Simons Response properties of vibrissa units in rat SI somatosensory neocortex. , 1978, Journal of neurophysiology.

[25]  H. Swadlow Efferent neurons and suspected interneurons in S-1 vibrissa cortex of the awake rabbit: receptive fields and axonal properties. , 1989, Journal of neurophysiology.

[26]  T. Woolsey,et al.  The structural organization of layer IV in the somatosensory region (S I) of mouse cerebral cortex , 1970 .

[27]  M. Armstrong‐James,et al.  Spatiotemporal convergence and divergence in the rat S1 “Barrel” cortex , 1987, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[28]  M. Deschenes,et al.  Intracortical arborizations and receptive fields of identified ventrobasal thalamocortical afferents to the primary somatic sensory cortex in the cat , 1981, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[29]  D. Simons,et al.  Membrane potential changes in rat SmI cortical neurons evoked by controlled stimulation of mystacial vibrissae , 1988, Brain Research.

[30]  Y. Kubota,et al.  Correlation of physiological subgroupings of nonpyramidal cells with parvalbumin- and calbindinD28k-immunoreactive neurons in layer V of rat frontal cortex. , 1993, Journal of neurophysiology.

[31]  D J Simons,et al.  Thalamocortical response transformations in simulated whisker barrels , 1993, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[32]  E. White,et al.  Three-dimensional aspects and synaptic relationships of a Golgi-impregnated spiny stellate cell reconstructed from serial thin sections , 1980, Journal of neurocytology.

[33]  D. Simons,et al.  A reliable technique for marking the location of extracellular recording sites using glass micropipettes , 1987, Neuroscience Letters.

[34]  O. Creutzfeldt,et al.  Extracellular and intracellular recordings from cat's cortical whisker projection area: thalamocortical response transformation. , 1977, Journal of neurophysiology.

[35]  E. White Cortical Circuits: Synaptic Organization of the Cerebral Cortex , 1989 .

[36]  J. Hyvärinen,et al.  Cortical neuronal mechanisms in flutter-vibration studied in unanesthetized monkeys. Neuronal periodicity and frequency discrimination. , 1969, Journal of neurophysiology.

[37]  KM Jacobs,et al.  Reshaping the cortical motor map by unmasking latent intracortical connections , 1991, Science.

[38]  S. Nelson,et al.  Orientation selectivity of cortical neurons during intracellular blockade of inhibition. , 1994, Science.

[39]  D. Simons Temporal and spatial integration in the rat SI vibrissa cortex. , 1985, Journal of neurophysiology.

[40]  Mriganka Sur,et al.  Morphology of single intracellularly stained axons terminating in area 3b of macaque monkeys , 1990, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[41]  E. White Thalamocortical synaptic relations: A review with emphasis on the projections of specific thalamic nuclei to the primary sensory areas of the neocortex , 1979, Brain Research Reviews.

[42]  H. Burton,et al.  Bicuculline-induced alterations in neuronal responses to controlled tactile stimuli in the second somatosensory cortex of the cat: a microiontophoretic study. , 1986, Somatosensory research.

[43]  W. Welker,et al.  Coding of somatic sensory input by vibrissae neurons in the rat's trigeminal ganglion. , 1969, Brain research.

[44]  M. A. Friedman,et al.  Thalamo‐cortical processing of vibrissal information in the rat. I. Intracortical origins of surround but not centre‐receptive fields of layer IV neurones in the rat S1 barrel field cortex , 1991, The Journal of comparative neurology.