The detection of neighbors by plants.

Abstract Whether plants detect and respond to neighboring plants is crucial for a complete understanding of how plants interact with each other. If plants do not detect and respond to neighbors, interactions are determined by the way in which each species alters available resources and the passive responses of nearby plants. If plants do detect and respond to neighbors, interactions are not regulated by resource availability alone. Most reports of plants detecting and responding to neighbors have focused on avoidance, where either roots or shoots grow away from a detected neighbor. However, a recent paper by Gersani and colleagues has demonstrated that soybeans increase root growth in soil shared with conspecific competitors. Their findings shed light on a new ecological role for noncognitive behavior in plants.

[1]  Bruce Bartholomew,et al.  Bare Zone between California Shrub and Grassland Communities: The Role of Animals , 1970, Science.

[2]  W. Hamilton,et al.  The Evolution of Cooperation , 1984 .

[3]  M. Caldwell,et al.  Morphological plasticity following species‐specific recognition and competition in two perennial grasses , 1996 .

[4]  D. Sumpter,et al.  Phase transition between disordered and ordered foraging in Pharaoh's ants , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[5]  C. H. Muller.  Allelopathy as a factor in ecological process , 2004, Vegetatio.

[6]  M. Pigliucci,et al.  Manipulative Approaches to Testing Adaptive Plasticity: Phytochrome‐Mediated Shade‐Avoidance Responses in Plants , 1999, The American Naturalist.

[7]  B. Haines,et al.  Volatile Growth Inhibitors Produced by Aromatic Shrubs , 1964, Science.

[8]  D. F. Rhoades.  Responses of Alder and Willow to Attack by Tent Caterpillars and Webworms: Evidence for Pheromonal Sensitivity of Willows , 1983 .

[9]  Joel s. Brown,et al.  Tragedy of the commons as a result of root competition , 2001 .

[10]  G. Hardin,et al.  The Tragedy of the Commons , 1968, Green Planet Blues.

[11]  Pedro J. Aphalo,et al.  On the importance of information-acquiring systems in plant-plant interactions , 1995 .

[12]  Inderjit,et al.  Allelopathy : organisms, processes, and applications , 1994 .

[13]  Ana L. Scopel,et al.  Far-Red Radiation Reflected from Adjacent Leaves: An Early Signal of Competition in Plant Canopies , 1990, Science.

[14]  R. Callaway,et al.  Root communication among desert shrubs. , 1991, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[15]  D. Tilman,et al.  8 – Allelopathy, Koch's Postulates, and the Neck Riddle , 1990 .

[16]  D. Lott,et al.  Definitions of territoriality used in the study of variation in vertebrate spacing systems , 1995, Animal Behaviour.

[17]  D. Mulcahy,et al.  Angiosperm Pollen and Ovules , 2011, Springer New York.

[18]  R. Callaway,et al.  Root Communication Mechanisms and Intracommunity Distributions of Two Mojave Desert Shrubs , 1992 .

[19]  H. J. Schenk,et al.  Spatial Root Segregation: Are Plants Territorial? , 1999 .

[20]  J. Krebs,et al.  An introduction to behavioural ecology , 1981 .

[21]  G. Laue,et al.  Communication between plants: induced resistance in wild tobacco plants following clipping of neighboring sagebrush , 2000, Oecologia.

[22]  J. H. Manwaring,et al.  Exploitation of Phosphate from Fertile Soil Microsites by Three Great Basin Perennials When in Competition , 1991 .

[23]  R. Whittaker,et al.  Allelochemics: chemical interactions between species. , 1971, Science.

[24]  R. Callaway,et al.  Effects of Regional Origin and Genotype on Intraspecific Root Communication in the Desert Shrub Ambrosia Dumosa (Asteraceae) , 1996 .

[25]  M. Caldwell,et al.  Perception of neighbouring plants by rhizomes and roots: morphological manifestations of a clonal plant , 1997 .

[26]  J. Keeley,et al.  Trace gas emissions and smoke-induced seed germination , 1997 .

[27]  M. Caldwell,et al.  Root growth responses of three Great Basin perennials to intra and interspecific contact with other roots , 1995 .

[28]  M. Käpylä,et al.  Pollen–pollen interactions in Betula pendula in vitro , 1998 .