FINDSITE: a combined evolution/structure-based approach to protein function prediction
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Prasanna R Kolatkar,et al. Assessment of CASP7 structure predictions for template free targets , 2007, Proteins.
[2] Gail J. Bartlett,et al. Analysis of catalytic residues in enzyme active sites. , 2002, Journal of molecular biology.
[3] Patricia C. Babbitt,et al. Automated discovery of 3D motifs for protein function annotation , 2006, Bioinform..
[4] Yang Zhang,et al. The protein structure prediction problem could be solved using the current PDB library. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[5] P C Babbitt,et al. Evolution of enzymatic activities in the enolase superfamily: crystal structure of (D)-glucarate dehydratase from Pseudomonas putida. , 1998, Biochemistry.
[6] Michela Taufer,et al. Study of a highly accurate and fast protein–ligand docking method based on molecular dynamics: Research Articles , 2005 .
[7] M. Ondrechen,et al. THEMATICS: A simple computational predictor of enzyme function from structure , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[8] A. Sali,et al. Comparative protein structure modeling of genes and genomes. , 2000, Annual review of biophysics and biomolecular structure.
[9] B. Shoichet,et al. Soft docking and multiple receptor conformations in virtual screening. , 2004, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[10] P. Babbitt,et al. Evolution of enzyme superfamilies. , 2006, Current opinion in chemical biology.
[11] I. Vakser. Low-resolution docking: prediction of complexes for underdetermined structures. , 1998, Biopolymers.
[12] A. Valencia,et al. Automatic methods for predicting functionally important residues. , 2003, Journal of molecular biology.
[13] Yang Zhang,et al. TASSER: An automated method for the prediction of protein tertiary structures in CASP6 , 2005, Proteins.
[14] Yang Zhang,et al. Large-scale assessment of the utility of low-resolution protein structures for biochemical function assignment , 2004, Bioinform..
[15] B. Rost. Twilight zone of protein sequence alignments. , 1999, Protein engineering.
[16] Patricia C Babbitt,et al. Can sequence determine function? , 2000, Genome Biology.
[17] D. van der Spoel,et al. Blind docking of drug‐sized compounds to proteins with up to a thousand residues , 2006, FEBS letters.
[18] J. Skolnick,et al. Method for prediction of protein function from sequence using the sequence-to-structure-to-function paradigm with application to glutaredoxins/thioredoxins and T1 ribonucleases. , 1998, Journal of molecular biology.
[19] A. Sali,et al. Structural genomics: beyond the Human Genome Project , 1999, Nature Genetics.
[20] Torsten Schwede,et al. Assessment of CASP7 predictions for template‐based modeling targets , 2007, Proteins.
[21] M. L. Connolly. Analytical molecular surface calculation , 1983 .
[22] Yang Zhang,et al. Template‐based modeling and free modeling by I‐TASSER in CASP7 , 2007, Proteins.
[23] T J Oldfield,et al. Data mining the protein data bank: Residue interactions , 2002, Proteins.
[24] Susumu Goto,et al. The KEGG resource for deciphering the genome , 2004, Nucleic Acids Res..
[25] Didier Rognan,et al. Protein‐based virtual screening of chemical databases. II. Are homology models of g‐protein coupled receptors suitable targets? , 2002, Proteins.
[26] Weidong Tian,et al. High precision multi-genome scale reannotation of enzyme function by EFICAz , 2006, BMC Genomics.
[27] J. Skolnick,et al. EFICAz: a comprehensive approach for accurate genome-scale enzyme function inference. , 2004, Nucleic acids research.
[28] Frances M. G. Pearl,et al. The CATH domain structure database: new protocols and classification levels give a more comprehensive resource for exploring evolution , 2006, Nucleic Acids Res..
[29] J. Skolnick,et al. From genes to protein structure and function: novel applications of computational approaches in the genomic era. , 2000, Trends in biotechnology.
[30] M Hendlich,et al. LIGSITE: automatic and efficient detection of potential small molecule-binding sites in proteins. , 1997, Journal of molecular graphics & modelling.
[31] Jens Meiler,et al. ROSETTALIGAND: Protein–small molecule docking with full side‐chain flexibility , 2006, Proteins.
[32] B. Shoichet,et al. Information decay in molecular docking screens against holo, apo, and modeled conformations of enzymes. , 2003, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[33] Dmitrij Frishman,et al. MIPS: analysis and annotation of genome information in 2007 , 2007, Nucleic Acids Res..
[34] 中尾 光輝,et al. KEGG(Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes)〔和文〕 (特集 ゲノム医学の現在と未来--基礎と臨床) -- (データベース) , 2000 .
[35] A J Olson,et al. Recognition templates for predicting adenylate-binding sites in proteins. , 2001, Journal of molecular biology.
[36] M. Gerstein,et al. The relationship between protein structure and function: a comprehensive survey with application to the yeast genome. , 1999, Journal of molecular biology.
[37] L. Kavraki,et al. An accurate, sensitive, and scalable method to identify functional sites in protein structures. , 2003, Journal of molecular biology.
[38] E. Koonin,et al. Evolution of protein domain promiscuity in eukaryotes. , 2008, Genome research.
[39] Thomas Lengauer,et al. A fast flexible docking method using an incremental construction algorithm. , 1996, Journal of molecular biology.
[40] Jeffrey Skolnick,et al. Efficient prediction of nucleic acid binding function from low-resolution protein structures. , 2006, Journal of molecular biology.
[41] J. Skolnick,et al. Development and large scale benchmark testing of the PROSPECTOR_3 threading algorithm , 2004, Proteins.
[42] J. Thornton,et al. A method for localizing ligand binding pockets in protein structures , 2005, Proteins.
[43] Adam Godzik,et al. New avenues in protein function prediction , 2006, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.
[44] Jürgen Bajorath,et al. Similarity Search Profiling Reveals Effects of Fingerprint Scaling in Virtual Screening. , 2005 .
[45] Shashi B. Pandit,et al. SUPFAM - a database of potential protein superfamily relationships derived by comparing sequence-based and structure-based families: implications for structural genomics and function annotation in genomes , 2002, Nucleic Acids Res..
[46] E. Jaeger,et al. Comparison of automated docking programs as virtual screening tools. , 2005, Journal of Medicinal Chemistry.
[47] Maya Topf,et al. PREDICT modeling and in‐silico screening for G‐protein coupled receptors , 2004, Proteins.
[48] D. Higgins,et al. Bioinformatics : sequence, structure, and databanks , 2000 .
[49] Anton J. Enright,et al. Protein interaction maps for complete genomes based on gene fusion events , 1999, Nature.
[50] David Baker,et al. Ranking predicted protein structures with support vector regression , 2007, Proteins.
[51] X. Zou,et al. Ensemble docking of multiple protein structures: Considering protein structural variations in molecular docking , 2006, Proteins.
[52] P C Babbitt,et al. Evolution of an enzyme active site: the structure of a new crystal form of muconate lactonizing enzyme compared with mandelate racemase and enolase. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[53] Alasdair T. R. Laurie,et al. Methods for the prediction of protein-ligand binding sites for structure-based drug design and virtual ligand screening. , 2006, Current protein & peptide science.
[54] C. Ouzounis,et al. Whole‐genome sequence annotation: ‘Going wrong with confidence’ , 1999, Molecular microbiology.
[55] Yoshihiro Yamanishi,et al. KEGG for linking genomes to life and the environment , 2007, Nucleic Acids Res..
[56] Andrey A Mironov,et al. A metabolic network in the evolutionary context: multiscale structure and modularity. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[57] Stacy T. Knutson,et al. Synergistic Computational and Experimental Proteomics Approaches for More Accurate Detection of Active Serine Hydrolases in Yeast , 2004, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.
[58] Akihiro Yamaguchi,et al. Enlarged FAMSBASE: protein 3D structure models of genome sequences for 41 species , 2003, Nucleic Acids Res..
[59] Benjamin F. Cravatt,et al. Assignment of protein function in the postgenomic era , 2005 .
[60] H. Edelsbrunner,et al. Anatomy of protein pockets and cavities: Measurement of binding site geometry and implications for ligand design , 1998, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.
[61] David S. Goodsell,et al. Automated docking using a Lamarckian genetic algorithm and an empirical binding free energy function , 1998 .
[62] T. N. Bhat,et al. The Protein Data Bank , 2000, Nucleic Acids Res..
[63] Hans Lehrach,et al. GOblet: a platform for Gene Ontology annotation of anonymous sequence data , 2004, Nucleic Acids Res..
[64] Andreas Evers,et al. Virtual screening of biogenic amine-binding G-protein coupled receptors: comparative evaluation of protein- and ligand-based virtual screening protocols. , 2005, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[65] Robert B. Russell,et al. Annotation in three dimensions , 2003 .
[66] P E Bourne,et al. Protein structure alignment by incremental combinatorial extension (CE) of the optimal path. , 1998, Protein engineering.
[67] B. Shoichet,et al. Flexible ligand docking using conformational ensembles , 1998, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.
[68] M J Sternberg,et al. Supersites within superfolds. Binding site similarity in the absence of homology. , 1998, Journal of molecular biology.
[69] A. Elcock. Prediction of functionally important residues based solely on the computed energetics of protein structure. , 2001, Journal of molecular biology.
[70] C. E. Peishoff,et al. A critical assessment of docking programs and scoring functions. , 2006, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[71] M. Gerstein,et al. Structural Genomics: Current Progress , 2003, Science.
[72] Günther Zehetner,et al. OntoBlast function: from sequence similarities directly to potential functional annotations by ontology terms , 2003, Nucleic Acids Res..
[73] Marc A. Martí-Renom,et al. MODBASE: a database of annotated comparative protein structure models and associated resources , 2005, Nucleic Acids Res..
[74] P. Willett,et al. Promoting Access to White Rose Research Papers Similarity-based Virtual Screening Using 2d Fingerprints , 2022 .
[75] Peter Willett,et al. Similarity-based virtual screening using 2D fingerprints. , 2006, Drug discovery today.
[76] Michael Ashburner,et al. Assessment of genome-wide protein function classification for Drosophila melanogaster. , 2003, Genome research.
[77] Russ B. Altman,et al. Automated Construction of Structural Motifs for Predicting Functional Sites on Protein Structures , 2003, Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing.
[78] M. Gerstein,et al. Assessing annotation transfer for genomics: quantifying the relations between protein sequence, structure and function through traditional and probabilistic scores. , 2000, Journal of molecular biology.
[79] E. Koonin,et al. The ancient Virus World and evolution of cells , 2006, Biology Direct.
[80] Robert B. Russell,et al. Annotation in three dimensions. PINTS: Patterns in Non-homologous Tertiary Structures , 2003, Nucleic Acids Res..
[81] David S. Goodsell,et al. Automated docking using a Lamarckian genetic algorithm and an empirical binding free energy function , 1998, J. Comput. Chem..
[82] R. Russell,et al. Detection of protein three-dimensional side-chain patterns: new examples of convergent evolution. , 1998, Journal of molecular biology.
[83] B. Rost,et al. Automatic prediction of protein function , 2003, Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences CMLS.
[84] J. Skolnick,et al. How well is enzyme function conserved as a function of pairwise sequence identity? , 2003, Journal of molecular biology.
[85] Cheryl H Arrowsmith,et al. Solution NMR in structural genomics. , 2006, Current opinion in structural biology.
[86] I. Vakser. Protein docking for low-resolution structures. , 1995, Protein engineering.
[87] Darren A. Natale,et al. The COG database: an updated version includes eukaryotes , 2003, BMC Bioinformatics.
[88] D. J. Price,et al. Assessing scoring functions for protein-ligand interactions. , 2004, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[89] S. Brenner. A tour of structural genomics , 2001, Nature Reviews Genetics.
[90] Todd J. A. Ewing,et al. DOCK 4.0: Search strategies for automated molecular docking of flexible molecule databases , 2001, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..
[91] Minoru Kanehisa,et al. Using protein motif combinations to update KEGG pathway maps and orthologue tables. , 2004, Genome informatics. International Conference on Genome Informatics.
[92] J. Skolnick,et al. Ab initio modeling of small proteins by iterative TASSER simulations , 2007, BMC Biology.
[93] Ivano Bertini. Structural genomics. , 2003, Accounts of chemical research.
[94] Jacquelyn S. Fetrow,et al. Structural genomics and its importance for gene function analysis , 2000, Nature Biotechnology.
[95] Patricia C. Babbitt,et al. Evolutionarily Conserved Substrate Substructures for Automated Annotation of Enzyme Superfamilies , 2008, PLoS Comput. Biol..
[96] Peter D Karp,et al. The past, present and future of genome-wide re-annotation , 2002, Genome Biology.
[97] J. Thornton,et al. Tess: A geometric hashing algorithm for deriving 3D coordinate templates for searching structural databases. Application to enzyme active sites , 1997, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.
[98] I. Enyedy,et al. Discovery of small-molecule inhibitors of Bcl-2 through structure-based computer screening. , 2001, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[99] W Patrick Walters,et al. A detailed comparison of current docking and scoring methods on systems of pharmaceutical relevance , 2004, Proteins.
[100] J. Skolnick,et al. Automated structure prediction of weakly homologous proteins on a genomic scale. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[101] Yang Zhang,et al. I-TASSER server for protein 3D structure prediction , 2008, BMC Bioinformatics.
[102] Cathy H. Wu,et al. The Universal Protein Resource (UniProt): an expanding universe of protein information , 2005, Nucleic Acids Res..
[103] C. Frömmel,et al. The automatic search for ligand binding sites in proteins of known three-dimensional structure using only geometric criteria. , 1996, Journal of molecular biology.
[104] Robert D. Finn,et al. Pfam 10 years on: 10 000 families and still growing , 2008, Briefings Bioinform..
[105] Lydia E. Kavraki,et al. Prediction of enzyme function based on 3D templates of evolutionarily important amino acids , 2008, BMC Bioinformatics.
[106] David T. Jones,et al. Threading methods for protein structure prediction , 2000 .
[107] Yang Zhang,et al. Tertiary structure predictions on a comprehensive benchmark of medium to large size proteins. , 2004, Biophysical journal.
[108] S. Teague. Implications of protein flexibility for drug discovery , 2003, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.
[109] Randy J Read,et al. Automated server predictions in CASP7 , 2007, Proteins.
[110] M. Schroeder,et al. LIGSITEcsc: predicting ligand binding sites using the Connolly surface and degree of conservation , 2006, BMC Structural Biology.
[111] Jacquelyn S Fetrow,et al. Function first: a powerful approach to post-genomic drug discovery. , 2002, Drug discovery today.
[112] Jeffrey Skolnick,et al. Assessment of programs for ligand binding affinity prediction , 2008, J. Comput. Chem..
[113] Neil Hall,et al. Advanced sequencing technologies and their wider impact in microbiology , 2007, Journal of Experimental Biology.
[114] M. Ashburner,et al. Gene Ontology: tool for the unification of biology , 2000, Nature Genetics.
[115] E. Huang,et al. Are predicted structures good enough to preserve functional sites? , 1999, Structure.
[116] P. Babbitt. Definitions of enzyme function for the structural genomics era. , 2003, Current opinion in chemical biology.
[117] M. Sternberg,et al. Automated prediction of protein function and detection of functional sites from structure. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[118] Andreas Martin Lisewski,et al. De-Orphaning the Structural Proteome through Reciprocal Comparison of Evolutionarily Important Structural Features , 2008, PloS one.
[119] Tim J. P. Hubbard,et al. Data growth and its impact on the SCOP database: new developments , 2007, Nucleic Acids Res..
[120] Lars Malmström,et al. Structure prediction for CASP7 targets using extensive all‐atom refinement with Rosetta@home , 2007, Proteins.
[121] A G Murzin,et al. SCOP: a structural classification of proteins database for the investigation of sequences and structures. , 1995, Journal of molecular biology.
[122] Eckart Bindewald,et al. A scoring function for docking ligands to low‐resolution protein structures , 2005, J. Comput. Chem..
[123] Jeffrey Skolnick,et al. DBD-Hunter: a knowledge-based method for the prediction of DNA–protein interactions , 2008, Nucleic acids research.
[124] Randy J Read,et al. Assessment of CASP7 predictions in the high accuracy template‐based modeling category , 2007, Proteins.
[125] Didier Rognan,et al. Comparative evaluation of eight docking tools for docking and virtual screening accuracy , 2004, Proteins.
[126] Robert D. Finn,et al. Pfam: clans, web tools and services , 2005, Nucleic Acids Res..
[127] G J Kleywegt,et al. Recognition of spatial motifs in protein structures. , 1999, Journal of molecular biology.
[128] R. Fleischmann,et al. The Minimal Gene Complement of Mycoplasma genitalium , 1995, Science.
[129] Richard A. Lewis,et al. Lessons in molecular recognition: the effects of ligand and protein flexibility on molecular docking accuracy. , 2004, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[130] W. Fitch. Homology a personal view on some of the problems. , 2000, Trends in genetics : TIG.
[131] P. Bork,et al. Predicting functions from protein sequences—where are the bottlenecks? , 1998, Nature Genetics.
[132] Michal Brylinski,et al. Q‐Dock: Low‐resolution flexible ligand docking with pocket‐specific threading restraints , 2008, J. Comput. Chem..
[133] Timothy B. Stockwell,et al. The Sequence of the Human Genome , 2001, Science.
[134] Irena Roterman-Konieczna,et al. Sequence-Structure-Function Relation Characterized in silico , 2006, Silico Biol..
[135] Seung Yup Lee,et al. Analysis of TASSER‐based CASP7 protein structure prediction results , 2007, Proteins.
[136] Thomas Hamelryck,et al. Efficient identification of side‐chain patterns using a multidimensional index tree , 2003, Proteins.
[137] Andrew A. Chien,et al. Study of a highly accurate and fast protein–ligand docking method based on molecular dynamics , 2005, Concurr. Comput. Pract. Exp..
[138] Dmitrij Frishman,et al. The PEDANT genome database in 2005 , 2004, Nucleic Acids Res..
[139] Dora M Schnur. Recent trends in library design: 'rational design' revisited. , 2008, Current opinion in drug discovery & development.
[140] J. Scott Dixon,et al. Flexible ligand docking using a genetic algorithm , 1995, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..
[141] Rachel Kolodny,et al. Comprehensive evaluation of protein structure alignment methods: scoring by geometric measures. , 2005, Journal of molecular biology.
[142] Leroy Hood,et al. The impact of systems approaches on biological problems in drug discovery , 2004, Nature Biotechnology.
[143] Michael E Phelps,et al. Systems Biology and New Technologies Enable Predictive and Preventative Medicine , 2004, Science.
[144] A. Lesk,et al. The relation between the divergence of sequence and structure in proteins. , 1986, The EMBO journal.
[145] J. Skolnick,et al. A threading-based method (FINDSITE) for ligand-binding site prediction and functional annotation , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[146] Dmitrij Frishman,et al. The PEDANT genome database , 2003, Nucleic Acids Res..
[147] D. Eisenberg,et al. Inference of protein function from protein structure. , 2005, Structure.
[148] Marek Wojciechowski,et al. Docking of small ligands to low‐resolution and theoretically predicted receptor structures , 2002, J. Comput. Chem..
[149] Ivan Rayment,et al. Divergent evolution in the enolase superfamily: the interplay of mechanism and specificity. , 2005, Archives of biochemistry and biophysics.
[150] Michael J E Sternberg,et al. The proteome: structure, function and evolution , 2006, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.
[151] Janet M Thornton,et al. Using electrostatic potentials to predict DNA-binding sites on DNA-binding proteins. , 2003, Nucleic acids research.
[152] Daisuke Kihara,et al. Microbial genomes have over 72% structure assignment by the threading algorithm PROSPECTOR_Q , 2004, Proteins.
[153] Shiow-Fen Hwang,et al. SODOCK: Swarm optimization for highly flexible protein–ligand docking , 2007, J. Comput. Chem..
[154] Krzysztof Fidelis,et al. Progress from CASP6 to CASP7 , 2007, Proteins.
[155] J. Skolnick,et al. TM-align: a protein structure alignment algorithm based on the TM-score , 2005, Nucleic acids research.
[156] Janet M. Thornton,et al. ProFunc: a server for predicting protein function from 3D structure , 2005, Nucleic Acids Res..
[157] John-Marc Chandonia,et al. Structural proteomics of minimal organisms: Conservation of protein fold usage and evolutionary implications , 2006, BMC Structural Biology.