A perceptual approach to the description and analysis of acousmatic music

This thesis investigates the problems of describing and analysing music that is composed for, and presented from, a fixed medium, and diffused over loudspeakers with minimal intervention, especially where such music resembles everyday sounds as much as it does traditional musical material. It is argued that most existing theories of acousmatic music are closely tied to prescriptive rather than descriptive concerns, and concentrate upon intrinsic aspects of acousmatic music to the detriment of its extrinsic potential. In contrast to such approaches a method of description based upon an ecological theory of listening which accounts for the relationship between structured information and the perception of events is proposed. This descriptive approach is used as the basis for analysing acousmatic pieces, revealing a complex interpretative relationship between listener, piece and environment. Such an approach, it is argued, accounts for those aspects of acousmatic music excluded by most current approaches, but more importantly provides a theoretical framework. within which descriptions may be arrived at which avoid the prescriptive bias of exisiting theories. The perspective provided by this analytical approach is reinterpreted through a critical approach to aesthetics, showing how acousmatic music can be seen as both autonomous and mimetic and how the dialectic between these two aspects is potentially critical of our relationship with the world. The relationship between musical techniques, materials and technology is discussed in response to this perspective showing how acousmatic music might be regarded as part of a broader aesthetic context. In conclusion, it is argued that acousmatic music does not merely challenge the view that music is primarily self-referential, but also that it reaffirms the possibility that music may be both intrinsically and extrinsically significant.

[1]  Denis Smalley,et al.  The listening imagination: Listening in the electroacoustic era , 1996 .

[2]  F. Wightman,et al.  A model of head-related transfer functions based on principal components analysis and minimum-phase reconstruction. , 1992, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[3]  Siegmund Levarie,et al.  A theory of harmony , 1985 .

[4]  S. Langer Feeling and Form , 1953 .

[5]  J. C. Risset Pitch Control and Pitch Paradoxes Demonstrated with Computer‐Synthesized Sounds , 1969 .

[6]  R. Guski,et al.  Listening: The Perception of Auditory Events? , 1991 .

[7]  Eric Clarke,et al.  Generativity, mimesis and the human body in music performance , 1993 .

[8]  R. Rorty,et al.  Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature. , 1980 .

[9]  Gerald J. Balzano,et al.  Music perception us detection of pitch-time constraints , 1982 .

[10]  Manfred Clynes,et al.  Sentics: The touch of emotions , 1977 .

[11]  Gerald J. Balzano,et al.  The Pitch Set as a Level of Description for Studying Musical Pitch Perception , 1982 .

[12]  S. Runeson,et al.  Kinematic specification of dynamics as an informational basis for person and action perception: Expe , 1983 .

[13]  J T Todd,et al.  Perception of growth: a geometric analysis of how different styles of change are distinguished. , 1981, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[14]  V. Kofi Agawu,et al.  Playing with Signs: A Semiotic Interpretation of Classic Music , 1991 .

[15]  J H Howard,et al.  Syntactic and semantic factors in the classification of nonspeech transient patterns , 1980, Perception & psychophysics.

[16]  Stephen McAdams,et al.  Music: A science of the mind? , 1987 .

[17]  B. Repp The sound of two hands clapping: an exploratory study. , 1987, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[18]  E. B. Silverman,et al.  A multidimensional scaling analysis of 16 complex sounds , 1976 .

[19]  David Keane,et al.  At the Threshold of an Aesthetic , 1986 .

[20]  W H Warren,et al.  Auditory perception of breaking and bouncing events: a case study in ecological acoustics. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[21]  Trevor Wishart,et al.  On Sonic Art , 1996 .

[22]  R. S. McGowan,et al.  An Acoustic Variable Specifying Time-to-Contact , 1991 .

[23]  R. Shepard Geometrical approximations to the structure of musical pitch. , 1982, Psychological review.

[24]  Anna M. Barry,et al.  Varese's 'Density 21.5': A Study in Semiological Analysis , 1982 .

[25]  Gerald J. Balzano,et al.  The group-theoretic description of 12-fold and microtonal pitch systems , 1980 .

[26]  G. Cohen,et al.  The Beautiful in Music; A Contribution to the Revisal of Musical Aesthetics , 1974 .

[27]  W H Warren,et al.  The Way the Ball Bounces: Visual and Auditory Perception of Elasticity and Control of the Bounce Pass , 1987, Perception.

[28]  Evan Eisenberg The Recording Angel , 1986 .

[29]  E. Bonard [The raw and the cooked]. , 1994, Revue medicale de la Suisse romande.

[30]  E. Spelke Perceiving Bimodally Specified Events in Infancy , 1979 .

[31]  James A. Ballas,et al.  Acquisition of acoustic pattern categories by exemplar observation , 1982 .

[32]  Claude Cadoz,et al.  A Modular Feedback Keyboard Design , 1990 .

[33]  Theodor W. Adorno,et al.  Dialectic of Enlightenment , 2020 .

[34]  Trevor Wishart,et al.  Sound Symbols and Landscapes , 1986 .

[35]  Theodor Wiesengrund Adorno Philosophy of Modern Music , 1976 .

[36]  Charles S. Peirce Peirce on signs , 1991 .

[37]  E. Reed The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception , 1989 .

[38]  J. Davidson Visual Perception of Performance Manner in the Movements of Solo Musicians , 1993 .

[39]  R. Barthes The grain of the voice , 1985 .

[40]  William W. Gaver What in the World Do We Hear? An Ecological Approach to Auditory Event Perception , 1993 .

[41]  T. Adorno The Aging of the New Music , 1988, Telos.