Simplified dynamical model and experimental verification of an underwater hydraulic soft robotic arm

Inherent compliance equips soft robotic arms with such advantages as incomparable flexibility, good adaptability, and safe interaction with the environment, etc. However, the strong nonlinearity also brings challenges to predict their dynamic behaviors. This work presents a simplified dynamic model of an underwater soft robotic arm which has three fiber-reinforced hydraulic chambers distributed symmetrically in each section. By controlling the pressures in the chambers, the soft robotic arm can perform complex spatial motion with multiple degrees of freedom. The model is based on Lagrangian method and piecewise constant curvature hypothesis, and considers the nonlinear viscoelasticity of soft material. The model accuracy is verified by the experiments of a two-section soft robotic arm with different actuation modes. The effects of geometrical features on dynamic response are also investigated through model-based simulation and test verification, which can provide guidance to parameter optimization. The proposed dynamic model can be extended to multiple sections and contribute to behavior analysis, performance prediction, and motion control of the soft robotic arm.

[1]  Shiqiang Zhu,et al.  Dynamical Characteristics of a Hydraulic Soft Actuator With Three Degrees of Freedom , 2021, ASME/BATH 2021 Symposium on Fluid Power and Motion Control.

[2]  Shiqiang Zhu,et al.  Research on energy consumption of fiber-reinforced fluidic soft actuators , 2021 .

[3]  Qing Xie,et al.  Design and modeling of a hydraulic soft actuator with three degrees of freedom , 2020, Smart Materials and Structures.

[4]  Hui Yang,et al.  A soft manipulator for efficient delicate grasping in shallow water: Modeling, control, and real-world experiments: , 2020 .

[5]  Shiqiang Zhu,et al.  An experimental study of bellows-type fluidic soft bending actuators under external water pressure , 2020, Smart Materials and Structures.

[6]  Tao Wang,et al.  An artificial muscle driven by decomposition of gas solution , 2019, Smart Materials and Structures.

[7]  George P Mylonas,et al.  Soft Robotics in Minimally Invasive Surgery , 2019, Soft robotics.

[8]  Seri Mastura Mustaza,et al.  Dynamic Modeling of Fiber-Reinforced Soft Manipulator: A Visco-Hyperelastic Material-Based Continuum Mechanics Approach. , 2019, Soft robotics.

[9]  Tao Wang,et al.  Parameter Identification and Model-Based Nonlinear Robust Control of Fluidic Soft Bending Actuators , 2019, IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics.

[10]  Tao Wang,et al.  A computationally efficient dynamical model of fluidic soft actuators and its experimental verification , 2019, Mechatronics.

[11]  Ian D. Walker,et al.  Center-of-Gravity-Based Approach for Modeling Dynamics of Multisection Continuum Arms , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Robotics.

[12]  Hesheng Wang,et al.  Underwater Dynamic Modeling for a Cable-Driven Soft Robot Arm , 2018, IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics.

[13]  Koichi Suzumori,et al.  A Modular Soft Robotic Wrist for Underwater Manipulation. , 2018, Soft robotics.

[14]  Robert J. Wood,et al.  Untethered soft robotics , 2018 .

[15]  Hod Lipson,et al.  Soft material for soft actuators , 2017, Nature Communications.

[16]  Hesheng Wang,et al.  A cable-driven soft robot surgical system for cardiothoracic endoscopic surgery: preclinical tests in animals , 2017, Surgical Endoscopy.

[17]  Lakmal Seneviratne,et al.  Discrete Cosserat Approach for Multisection Soft Manipulator Dynamics , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Robotics.

[18]  Daniela Rus,et al.  Design, kinematics, and control of a soft spatial fluidic elastomer manipulator , 2016, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[19]  Darwin G. Caldwell,et al.  Dynamics for variable length multisection continuum arms , 2016, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[20]  Robert J. Wood,et al.  Soft robotic glove for combined assistance and at-home rehabilitation , 2015, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[21]  WirzRaul,et al.  Accurate and Efficient Dynamics for Variable-Length Continuum Arms: A Center of Gravity Approach , 2015 .

[22]  Russ Tedrake,et al.  Dynamics and trajectory optimization for a soft spatial fluidic elastomer manipulator , 2015, 2015 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA).

[23]  Robert J. Wood,et al.  Modeling of Soft Fiber-Reinforced Bending Actuators , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Robotics.

[24]  Cecilia Laschi,et al.  Bioinspired Soft Actuation System Using Shape Memory Alloys , 2014 .

[25]  Matteo Cianchetti,et al.  Dynamic Model of a Multibending Soft Robot Arm Driven by Cables , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Robotics.

[26]  Thomas M. Sutter,et al.  Rubber muscle actuation with pressurized CO2 from enzyme-catalyzed urea hydrolysis , 2013 .

[27]  Darwin G. Caldwell,et al.  Dynamics for biomimetic continuum arms: A modal approach , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Biomimetics.

[28]  Robert J. Webster,et al.  Design and Kinematic Modeling of Constant Curvature Continuum Robots: A Review , 2010, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[29]  K. Papoulia,et al.  Rheological representation of fractional order viscoelastic material models , 2010 .

[30]  Ian D. Walker,et al.  Field trials and testing of the OctArm continuum manipulator , 2006, Proceedings 2006 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2006. ICRA 2006..

[31]  S. M. Hadi Sadati,et al.  Control Space Reduction and Real-Time Accurate Modeling of Continuum Manipulators Using Ritz and Ritz–Galerkin Methods , 2018, IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters.