Computational Modeling in Developmental Psychology

This manuscript surveys computational modeling efforts by researchers in developmental psychology. Developmental psychology is ready to blossom into a modern science that focuses on causal mechanistic explanations of development rather than just describing and classifying behaviors. Computational modeling is the key to this process. However, to be effective, models must not only mimic observed data. They must also be transparent, grounded, and plausible to be accepted by the developmental psychology community. Connectionist model provides one such example. Many developmental features of typical and atypical perception, cognition, and language have been modeled using connectionist methods. Successful models are closely tied to the details of existing empirical studies and make concrete testable predictions. The success of such a project relies on the close collaboration of computational scientists with empirical psychologists

[1]  S. Lewandowsky The Rewards and Hazards of Computer Simulations , 1993 .

[2]  P. Dayan,et al.  Dopamine, learning, and impulsivity: a biological account of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. , 2005, Journal of child and adolescent psychopharmacology.

[3]  Denis Mareschal,et al.  How the brain constructs cognition , 2007 .

[4]  Fiona M. Richardson,et al.  The benefits of computational modelling for the study of developmental disorders: extending the Triesch et al. model to ADHD. , 2006, Developmental science.

[5]  Anders Krogh,et al.  Introduction to the theory of neural computation , 1994, The advanced book program.

[6]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Connectionist models of development , 2003 .

[7]  S. Hyakin,et al.  Neural Networks: A Comprehensive Foundation , 1994 .

[8]  Margaret A. Boden,et al.  Computer models of mind , 1988 .

[9]  T. Shultz,et al.  The learning of first and second person pronouns in English: network models and analysis , 1999, Journal of Child Language.

[10]  Peter C M Molenaar,et al.  Modeling developmental transitions in adaptive resonance theory. , 2004, Developmental science.

[11]  S. Grossberg,et al.  Neural dynamics of autistic behaviors: cognitive, emotional, and timing substrates. , 2006, Psychological review.

[12]  Thomas R. Shultz,et al.  Development of Children's Seriation: A Connectionist Approach , 1999, Connect. Sci..

[13]  Patrick Juola,et al.  A connectionist model of english past tense and plural morphology , 1999, Cogn. Sci..

[14]  C Donlan,et al.  GENETIC BASIS OF SPECIFIC LANGUAGE IMPAIRMENT: EVIDENCE FROM A TWIN STUDY , 1995, Developmental medicine and child neurology.

[15]  T. Shultz,et al.  Modeling developmental cognitive neuroscience , 2006, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[16]  Barbara A. Younger,et al.  Developmental change in infants' perception of correlations among attributes. , 1986, Child development.

[17]  Michael S. C. Thomas Multiple causality in developmental disorders: methodological implications from computational modelling , 2003 .

[18]  Daniel Ansari,et al.  Atypical development of language and social communication in toddlers with Williams syndrome , 2002 .

[19]  Matthew C. Casey,et al.  Connectionist simulation of quantification skills , 2002 .

[20]  Michael S. C. Thomas,et al.  Connectionist Models of Development, Developmental Disorders and Individual Differences Pre-existing Theoretical Claims , 2022 .

[21]  Ursula Bellugi,et al.  I. The Neurocognitive Profile of Williams Syndrome: A Complex Pattern of Strengths and Weaknesses , 2000, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[22]  Laurence B. Leonard,et al.  Children with Specific Language Impairment , 1997 .

[23]  Stanislas Dehaene,et al.  Neuronal models of cognitive functions , 1989, Cognition.

[24]  P. Quinn,et al.  Categorization in infancy , 2001, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[25]  Thomas R. Shultz,et al.  Modeling Cognitive Development on Balance Scale Phenomena , 2004, Machine Learning.

[26]  C. Teuscher,et al.  Gaze following: why (not) learn it? , 2006, Developmental science.

[27]  U. Hahn,et al.  German Inflection: Single Route or Dual Route? , 2000, Cognitive Psychology.

[28]  Problèmes de psychologie génétique , 1972 .

[29]  G. Dawson,et al.  Early recognition of children with autism: A study of first birthday home videotapes , 1994, Journal of autism and developmental disorders.

[30]  Laura Lakusta,et al.  Past tense formation in Williams syndrome , 2001 .

[31]  Thomas R. Shultz,et al.  A connectionist model of the learning of personal pronouns in English , 1994, COLT 1994.

[32]  Allen Newell,et al.  The logic theory machine-A complex information processing system , 1956, IRE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[33]  T. Shultz,et al.  Generative connectionist networks and constructivist cognitive development , 1996 .

[34]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Understanding normal and impaired word reading: computational principles in quasi-regular domains. , 1996, Psychological review.

[35]  Erik Willcutt,et al.  Towards an understanding of unique and shared pathways in the psychopathophysiology of ADHD. , 2005, Developmental science.

[36]  What is Modularity Good For , 2006 .

[37]  G. Marcus The Algebraic Mind: Integrating Connectionism and Cognitive Science , 2001 .

[38]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Rethinking infant knowledge: toward an adaptive process account of successes and failures in object permanence tasks. , 1997, Psychological review.

[39]  J. Elman,et al.  Rethinking Innateness: A Connectionist Perspective on Development , 1996 .

[40]  M. Ullman,et al.  Specific Language Impairment is not Specific to Language: the Procedural Deficit Hypothesis , 2005, Cortex.

[41]  V. Marchman,et al.  Learning from a connectionist model of the acquisition of the English past tense , 1996, Cognition.

[42]  P. D. Eimas,et al.  Evidence for Representations of Perceptually Similar Natural Categories by 3-Month-Old and 4-Month-Old Infants , 1993, Perception.

[43]  M. Dubin,et al.  Development of receptive-field properties of retinal ganglion cells in kittens. , 1977, Journal of neurophysiology.

[44]  Matthew Schlesinger,et al.  Evolving agents as a metaphor for the developing child. , 2004, Developmental science.

[45]  Kim Plunkett,et al.  Evolution of a Rapidly Learned Representation for Speech , 1998, CoNLL.

[46]  Steven Pinker,et al.  Words and rules , 1998 .

[47]  Gert Westermann,et al.  Neuroconstructivism Volume TwoPerspectives and Prospects , 2007 .

[48]  Raymond J. Mooney,et al.  Induction of First-Order Decision Lists: Results on Learning the Past Tense of English Verbs , 1995, J. Artif. Intell. Res..

[49]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Semantic Cognition: A Parallel Distributed Processing Approach , 2004 .

[50]  Chris Sinha,et al.  Symbol Grounding or the Emergence of Symbols? Vocabulary Growth in Children and a Connectionist Net , 1992 .

[51]  J. G. Wallace,et al.  Cognitive development: An information-processing view , 1976 .

[52]  R. French,et al.  A connectionist account of asymmetric category learning in early infancy. , 2000, Developmental psychology.

[53]  David J. Field,et al.  What Is the Goal of Sensory Coding? , 1994, Neural Computation.

[54]  A. Meltzoff,et al.  Children with Autism Fail to Orient to Naturally Occurring Social Stimuli , 1998, Journal of autism and developmental disorders.

[55]  Drew McDermott,et al.  Artificial intelligence meets natural stupidity , 1976, SGAR.

[56]  D. Mareschal,et al.  A computational and neuropsychological account of object‐oriented behaviours in infancy , 1999 .

[57]  D. Mareschal,et al.  Modeling Infant Speech Sound Discrimination Using Simple Associative Networks. , 2001, Infancy : the official journal of the International Society on Infant Studies.

[58]  T. Shultz,et al.  Neural network modeling of developmental effects in discrimination shifts. , 1998, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[59]  Kim Plunkett,et al.  A Connectionist Model of the Arabic Plural System , 1997 .

[60]  Geoffrey E. Hinton Connectionist Learning Procedures , 1989, Artif. Intell..

[61]  Thomas R. Shultz,et al.  A computational analysis of conservation. , 1998 .

[62]  A. Karmiloff-Smith,et al.  Williams syndrome: from genotype through to the cognitive phenotype. , 2000, American journal of medical genetics.

[63]  David J. Field,et al.  Wavelets, vision and the statistics of natural scenes , 1999, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[64]  Simon Haykin,et al.  Neural Networks: A Comprehensive Foundation , 1998 .

[65]  R. M. Young Seriation by Children: An Artificial Intelligence Analysis of a Piagetian Task , 1980 .

[66]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Nature, nurture, and connections: Implications of connectionist models for cognitive development. , 1991 .

[67]  H. Herzel Chaotic Evolution and Strange Attractors , 1991 .

[68]  Charles X. Ling,et al.  A Decision-Tree Model of Balance Scale Development , 2004, Machine Learning.

[69]  James L. McClelland Parallel Distributed Processing , 2005 .

[70]  Michael Gasser,et al.  Learning Nouns and Adjectives: A Connectionist Account , 1998 .

[71]  A. Karmiloff-Smith Development itself is the key to understanding developmental disorders , 1998, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[72]  S. Sirois Autoassociator networks: insights into infant cognition. , 2004, Developmental science.

[73]  C Donlan,et al.  Nonword repetition as a behavioural marker for inherited language impairment: evidence from a twin study. , 1996, Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines.

[74]  A. Silverstein The Developmental Psychology of Jean Piaget , 1965 .

[75]  James L. McClelland,et al.  A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming. , 1989, Psychological review.

[76]  J. Elman Learning and development in neural networks: the importance of starting small , 1993, Cognition.

[77]  D. Mareschal,et al.  From Parts to Wholes: Mechanisms of Development in Infant Visual Object Processing. , 2004, Infancy : the official journal of the International Society on Infant Studies.

[78]  R. Galatzer-Levy,et al.  Chaotic possibilities: Toward a new model of development , 2004, The International journal of psycho-analysis.

[79]  W. F. Hill Learning: A Survey of Psychological Interpretations , 1972 .

[80]  K. Plunkett,et al.  Connectionism and developmental theory , 1992 .

[81]  G. Westermann,et al.  A new model of sensorimotor coupling in the development of speech , 2004, Brain and Language.

[82]  Y. Munakata Article with Peer Commentaries and Response Infant Perseveration and Implications for Object Permanence Theories: a Pdp Model of the Ab B Task , 2022 .

[83]  Marco C. Bettoni,et al.  Made-Up Minds: A Constructivist Approach to Artificial Intelligence , 1993, IEEE Expert.

[84]  Mark S. Seidenberg,et al.  Impairments in verb morphology after brain injury: a connectionist model. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[85]  R. Adolphs,et al.  II. Hypersociability in Williams Syndrome , 2000, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[86]  Michael S. C. Thomas How Do Simple Connectionist Networks Achieve a Shift From "Featural" to "Correlational" Processing in Categorization? , 2004, Infancy : the official journal of the International Society on Infant Studies.

[87]  J. B. Birks,et al.  Rutherford at Manchester , 1963 .

[88]  Martial Mermillod,et al.  The role of bottom-up processing in perceptual categorization by 3- to 4-month-old infants: simulations and data. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[89]  William Gregory Sakas,et al.  Psychocomputational Models of Human Language Acquisition , 2007 .

[90]  B. Younger The segregation of items into categories by ten-month-old infants. , 1985, Child development.

[91]  Allen Newell,et al.  Heuristic Problem Solving: The Next Advance in Operations Research , 1958 .

[92]  Mark S. Seidenberg,et al.  Phonology, reading acquisition, and dyslexia: insights from connectionist models. , 1999, Psychological review.

[93]  Denis Mareschal,et al.  A connectionist account of the emergence of the literal-metaphorical-anomalous distinction in young children , 2001 .

[94]  J. McDonald Language acquisition: the acquisition of linguistic structure in normal and special populations. , 1997, Annual review of psychology.

[95]  R. L. Fantz Visual Experience in Infants: Decreased Attention to Familiar Patterns Relative to Novel Ones , 1964, Science.

[96]  Mark S. Seidenberg,et al.  Phonology and syntax in specific language impairment: Evidence from a connectionist model , 2003, Brain and Language.

[97]  M. Ullman,et al.  Past tense morphology in specifically language impaired and normally developing children , 2001 .

[98]  Paula Buttery,et al.  A Quantitative Evaluation of Naturalistic Models of Language Acquisition; the Efficiency of the Triggering Learning Algorithm Compared to a Categorial Grammar Learner , 2004, Workshop On Psycho-Computational Models Of Human Language Acquisition.

[99]  Michael T. Ullman,et al.  Inflectional morphology in a family with inherited specific language impairment , 1999, Applied Psycholinguistics.

[100]  A. Newell Unified Theories of Cognition , 1990 .

[101]  Morten H. Christiansen,et al.  Connectionist psycholinguistics: capturing the empirical data , 2001, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[102]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Can a perceptual processing deficit explain the impairment of inflectional morphology in developmental dysphasia? A computational investigation. , 1993 .

[103]  Rusoff Ac,et al.  Development of receptive-field properties of retinal ganglion cells in kittens. , 1977 .

[104]  Edmund T. Rolls,et al.  Introduction to Connectionist Modelling of Cognitive Processes , 1998 .

[105]  V. Marchman,et al.  U-shaped learning and frequency effects in a multi-layered perception: Implications for child language acquisition , 1991, Cognition.

[106]  Michael S. C. Thomas,et al.  Modeling language acquisition in atypical phenotypes. , 2003, Psychological review.

[107]  Michael S. C. Thomas,et al.  Characterising Compensation (Commentary on Ullman and Pierpont, “Specific Language Impairment is not Specific to Language: The Procedural Deficit Hypothesis”) , 2005, Cortex.

[108]  G. Lewicki,et al.  Approximation by Superpositions of a Sigmoidal Function , 2003 .

[109]  Morten H. Christiansen,et al.  Learning to Segment Speech Using Multiple Cues: A Connectionist Model , 1998 .

[110]  Michael S. C. Thomas,et al.  Are developmental disorders like cases of adult brain damage? Implications from connectionist modelling , 2002, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[111]  Frank D. Baughman,et al.  Computational Modeling of Variability in the Balance Scale Task , 2006 .

[112]  Jonathan Williams,et al.  Dopamine Appetite and Cognitive Impairment in Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder , 2004, Neural plasticity.