Opening Platforms: How, When and Why?

Platform-mediated networks encompass several distinct types of participants, including end users, complementors, platform providers who facilitate users' access to complements, and sponsors who develop platform technologies. Each of these roles can be opened - that is, structured to encourage participation - or closed. This paper reviews factors that motivate decisions to open or close mature platforms. At the platform provider and sponsor levels, these decisions entail: 1) interoperating with established rival platforms; 2) licensing additional platform providers; or 3) broadening sponsorship. With respect to end users and complementors, decisions to open or close a mature platform involve: 1) backward compatibility with prior platform generations; 2) securing exclusive rights to certain complements; or 3) absorbing complements into the core platform. Over time, forces tend to push both proprietary and shared platforms toward hybrid governance models characterized by centralized control over platform technology (i.e., closed sponsorship) and shared responsibility for serving users (i.e., an open provider role).

[1]  Thomas R. Eisenmann,et al.  Platform Envelopment , 2010 .

[2]  Geoffrey G. Parker,et al.  Innovation, openness & platform control , 2010, EC '10.

[3]  P. Rey,et al.  Abuse of Dominance and Licensing of Intellectual Property , 2008 .

[4]  Kevin J. Boudreau,et al.  Opening the Platform vs. Opening the Complementary Good? The Effect on Product Innovation in Handheld Computing , 2008 .

[5]  Thomas R. Eisenmann Managing Proprietary and Shared Platforms , 2007 .

[6]  Haim Mendelson,et al.  Divide and Conquer: Competing with Free Technology Under Network Effects , 2008 .

[7]  Siva Viswanathan,et al.  Exclusive Licensing in Complementary Network Industries , 2007 .

[8]  Carliss Y. Baldwin,et al.  Competition in Modular Clusters , 2007 .

[9]  Richard Schmalensee,et al.  Catalyst Code: The Strategies Behind the World's Most Dynamic Companies , 2007 .

[10]  Ramon Casadesus-Masanell,et al.  Wintel: Cooperation and Conflict , 2007, Manag. Sci..

[11]  Andrei Hagiu,et al.  Invisible Engines: How Software Platforms Drive Innovation and Transform Industries , 2016 .

[12]  Thomas R. Eisenmann,et al.  Strategies for Two Sided Markets , 2006 .

[13]  David B. Yoffie,et al.  With friends like these: the art of managing complementors. , 2006, Harvard business review.

[14]  Nicholas Economides,et al.  Two-Sided Competition of Proprietary vs. Open Source Technology Platforms and the Implications for the Software Industry , 2005, Manag. Sci..

[15]  Andrei Hagiu,et al.  Proprietary vs. Open Two-Sided Platforms and Social Efficiency , 2006 .

[16]  Thomas R. Eisenmann,et al.  PayPal Merchant Services , 2006 .

[17]  Timothy S. Simcoe Open Standards and Intellectual Property Rights , 2006 .

[18]  Timothy Simcoe,et al.  Standards and Public Policy: Delay and de jure standardization: exploring the slowdown in Internet standards development , 2006 .

[19]  J. West,et al.  The Economic Realities of Open Standards : Black , White and Many Shades of Gray Joel West , 2005 .

[20]  Geoffrey G. Parker,et al.  Two-Sided Network Effects: A Theory of Information Product Design , 2010, Manag. Sci..

[21]  A. Gawer,et al.  Platform Owner Entry and Innovation in Complementary Markets: Evidence from Intel , 2005 .

[22]  M. Armstrong Competition in Two-Sided Markets ¤ , 2005 .

[23]  Thomas R. Eisenmann,et al.  NTT DoCoMo, Inc.: Mobile FeliCa , 2005 .

[24]  Thomas R. Eisenmann,et al.  Sun Microsystems, Inc.: Web Services Strategy , 2005 .

[25]  Lamont Wood,et al.  Google, Inc. , 2005, Scientific American.

[26]  S. Mazzocchi Open Innovation: The New Imperative For Creating and Profiting From Technology , 2004 .

[27]  Marco Iansiti,et al.  The Keystone Advantage: What the New Dynamics of Business Ecosystems Mean for Strategy, Innovation, and Sustainability , 2004 .

[28]  M. Jacobides Industry Change Through Vertical Dis-Integration: How and Why Markets Emerged in Mortgage Banking , 2004 .

[29]  N. Kulatilaka,et al.  Strategic Investment in Technology Standards , 2004 .

[30]  B. Nalebuff Bundling as an Entry Barrier , 2004 .

[31]  Thomas R. Eisenmann,et al.  Electronic Arts in Online Gaming , 2004 .

[32]  Philip J. Weiser,et al.  Modularity, Vertical Integration, and Open Access Policies: Towards a Convergence of Antitrust and Regulation in the Internet Age , 2003 .

[33]  Oscar Hauptman,et al.  Platform leadership , 2002 .

[34]  Joel West,et al.  How open is open enough?: Melding proprietary and open source platform strategies , 2003 .

[35]  Carliss Y. Baldwin,et al.  IBM and Linux (A) , 2003 .

[36]  Jacques Crémer,et al.  Connectivity in the Commercial Internet , 2003 .

[37]  Timothy F. Bresnahan,et al.  Technological Competition and the Structure of the Computer Industry , 2003 .

[38]  Henry Chesbrough,et al.  Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology , 2003 .

[39]  J. Rochet,et al.  Platform competition in two sided markets , 2003 .

[40]  Robert J. Kauffman,et al.  The Network Externalities Hypothesis and Competitive Network Growth , 2002, J. Organ. Comput. Electron. Commer..

[41]  A. Kumaraswamy,et al.  INSTITUTIONAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP IN THE SPONSORSHIP OF COMMON TECHNOLOGICAL STANDARDS: THE CASE OF SUN MICROSYSTEMS AND JAVA * , 2002 .

[42]  A. Gawer,et al.  Platform Leadership How Intel, Microsoft, and Cisco Drive Industry Innovation , 2002 .

[43]  David B. Yoffie,et al.  Judo Strategy: Turning Your Competitors Strength to Your Advantage , 2001 .

[44]  Kevin M. Murphy,et al.  Economic Perspectives on Software Design: Pc Operating Systems and Platforms , 2001 .

[45]  Geoffrey G. Parker,et al.  Information Complements, Substitutes, and Strategic Product Design , 2000, ICIS.

[46]  Barry Nalebuff,et al.  Competing Against Bundles , 2000 .

[47]  R. V. Hoek Clockspeed: Winning Industry Control in the Age of Temporary Advantage , 2000 .

[48]  Neil Gandal,et al.  Systems Competition, Vertical Merger, and Foreclosure , 2000 .

[49]  Thomas R. Eisenmann,et al.  CarPoint in 1999 , 2000 .

[50]  H. Varian,et al.  The Art of Standards Wars , 1999 .

[51]  Timothy F. Bresnahan,et al.  New Modes of Competition , 1999 .

[52]  Richard Schmalensee,et al.  Paying with Plastic: The Digital Revolution in Buying and Borrowing , 1999 .

[53]  Jan Venselaar,et al.  DESIGN RULES , 1999 .

[54]  Michael Waldman,et al.  The Strategic Use of Tying to Preserve and Create Market Power in Evolving Industries , 1998 .

[55]  Michael A. Cusumano,et al.  Competing On Internet Time: Lessons From Netscape And Its Battle With Microsoft , 1998 .

[56]  Charles H. Fine Clockspeed: Winning Industry Control In The Age Of Temporary Advantage , 1998 .

[57]  Drew Fudenberg,et al.  Upgrades, Tradeins, and Buybacks , 1998 .

[58]  Timothy F. Bresnahan,et al.  New Modes of Competition: Implications for the Future Structure of the Computer Industry , 1998 .

[59]  Yannis Bakos,et al.  Bundling Information Goods: Pricing, Profits and Efficiency , 1998 .

[60]  Pierre Regibeau,et al.  A selective review of the economics of standardization. Entry deterrence, technological progress and international competition , 1996 .

[61]  Andrew S. Grove,et al.  Only the Paranoid Survive: How to Exploit the Crisis Points that Challenge Every Company and Career , 1996 .

[62]  Marvin A. Sirbu,et al.  Price Competition and Compatibility in the Presence of Positive Demand Externalities , 1995 .

[63]  James M. Utterback,et al.  Dominant Designs and the Survival of Firms , 1995 .

[64]  Jay Pil Choi,et al.  Network Externality, Compatibility Choice, and Planned Obsolescence , 1994 .

[65]  Joseph Farrell,et al.  Choosing How to Compete: Strategies and Tactics in Standardization , 1994 .

[66]  D. B. Davis,et al.  Sun Microsystems Inc. , 1993 .

[67]  R. Langlois,et al.  Networks and innovation in a modular system: Lessons from the microcomputer and stereo component industries , 1992 .

[68]  C. Shapiro,et al.  Product Introduction with Network Externalities , 1992 .

[69]  Neil Gandal,et al.  NETWORK EFFECTS, SOFTWARE PROVISION, AND STANDARDIZATION* , 1992 .

[70]  M. Cusumano,et al.  Strategic Maneuvering and Mass-Market Dynamics: The Triumph of VHS over Beta , 1992, Business History Review.

[71]  Kim B. Clark,et al.  Architectural Innovation: The Reconfiguration of Existing Product Technologies and the Failure of , 1990 .

[72]  P. David,et al.  The Economics Of Compatibility Standards: An Introduction To Recent Research 1 , 1990 .

[73]  M. Whinston Tying, Foreclosure, and Exclusion , 1989 .

[74]  P. David,et al.  The economics of gateway technology and network evolution: lessons from electricity supply history , 1988 .

[75]  Joseph Farrell,et al.  Coordination Through Committees and Markets , 1987 .

[76]  Nancy Gallini,et al.  Second-sourcing as a Commitment: Monopoly Incentives to Attract Competition - eScholarship , 1986 .

[77]  C. Shapiro,et al.  Technology Adoption in the Presence of Network Externalities , 1986, Journal of Political Economy.

[78]  Joseph Farrell,et al.  Standardization, Compatibility, and Innovation , 1985 .

[79]  C. Shapiro,et al.  Network Externalities, Competition, and Compatibility , 1985 .

[80]  Richard Schmalensee,et al.  Gaussian Demand and Commodity Bundling , 1984 .