Increasing learners’ satisfaction/intention to adopt more e-learning

Purpose: E-learning is an organisationally risky investment given the cost and poor levels of adoption by users. In order to gain a better understanding of this problem, a study was conducted into the use of e-learning in a rail organisation. Design/methodology/approach: Using an online survey, employees of a rail-sector organisation were questioned about their use and likelihood of adoption of e-learning. This study explores the factors that affect the way in which learners experience and perceive such systems. Using statistical analysis, twelve hypotheses are tested and explored. Relationships between learning satisfaction, intention to adopt and the characteristics of e-learning systems were established. Findings: The study found that e-learning characteristics can buffer the relationship between learner characteristics and intention to adopt further e-learning in the future. Further, we found that high levels of support can compensate individuals who are low in technological efficacy to adopt e-learning. Research limitations/implications: The cross-sectional design of the study and its focus on measuring intention to adopt as opposed to actual adoption are both limitations. Future research using longitudinal design and research employing a time lag design measuring actual adoption as well as intention are recommended. Practical implications: From a practical perspective, organizations can focus on the actual content and authenticity of the learning experience delivered by the e-learning system to significantly impact how employees will perceive and use e-learning in the future. Low technological efficacy individuals tend not to adopt new technology. Instead of changing individuals’ personalities, organizations can implement supportive policies and practices which would lead to higher e-learning adoption rate among low efficacy individuals. Originality/value: The study integrates technology adoption and learning literatures in developing enablers for e-learning in organizations. Further, this study collects data from rail employees, and therefore the findings are practical to an industry.

[1]  J. Strother,et al.  An Assessment of the Effectiveness of e-learning in Corporate Training Programs , 2002 .

[2]  Fred D. Davis.  Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..

[3]  N. Sharon Hill,et al.  Comparing apples and oranges: toward a typology for assessing e-learning effectiveness , 2010 .

[4]  Dowming Yeh,et al.  What drives a successful e-Learning? An empirical investigation of the critical factors influencing learner satisfaction , 2008, Comput. Educ..

[5]  Lucy W. Gibson,et al.  An Investigation of Personality Traits in Relation to Career Satisfaction , 2003 .

[6]  Rajiv Kohli,et al.  Antecedents of B2C Channel Satisfaction and Preference: Validating e-Commerce Metrics , 2002, Inf. Syst. Res..

[7]  Paul A. Pavlou,et al.  Understanding and Predicting Electronic Commerce Adoption: An Extension of the Theory of Planned Behavior , 2006, MIS Q..

[8]  R. Dholakia,et al.  Factors Impacting the Adoption of the Internet among SMEs , 2004 .

[9]  Theo J. Bastiaens,et al.  The surplus value of an authentic learning environment , 2005, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[10]  Charles B. Hodges.  Designing to Motivate: Motivational Techniques to Incorporate in E-Learning Experiences , 2004 .

[11]  Elena Karahanna,et al.  Time Flies When You're Having Fun: Cognitive Absorption and Beliefs About Information Technology Usage , 2000, MIS Q..

[12]  Elwood F. Holton,et al.  A Theory of Effective Computer-Based Instruction for Adults , 2005 .

[13]  A. Bandura.  Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency , 2024, Psihologìâ ì suspìlʹstvo.

[14]  Blair H. Sheppard,et al.  The Theory of Reasoned Action: A Meta-Analysis of Past Research with Recommendations for Modifications and Future Research , 1988 .

[15]  Kate Fry,et al.  E‐learning markets and providers: some issues and prospects , 2001 .

[16]  Sukanlaya Sawang,et al.  An Exploratory Study of Innovation Effectiveness Measurement in Australian and Thai SMEs , 2007 .

[17]  R. Bagozzi,et al.  An attitudinal model of technology-based self-service: Moderating effects of consumer traits and situational factors , 2002 .

[18]  I. Ajzen.  The theory of planned behavior , 1991 .

[19]  Blake Ives,et al.  Web-based Virtual Learning Environments: a Research Framework and a Preliminary Assessment of Effectiveness in Basic It Skills Training Author(s): Piccoli Et Al./web-based Virtual Learning Environments Web-based Virtual Learning Environments: a Research Framework and a Preliminary Assessment of Effe , 2022 .

[20]  J. Hollenbeck,et al.  Computer-assisted communication and team decision-making performance: the moderating effect of openness to experience. , 2002, The Journal of applied psychology.

[21]  K. Hong.  Relationships between students' and instructional variables with satisfaction and learning from a Web-based course , 2002, Internet High. Educ..

[22]  Bill Davey,et al.  ICT and Training: A Proposal for an Ecological Model of Innovation , 2003, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[23]  Mark Keil,et al.  Usefulness and ease of use: field study evidence regarding task considerations , 1995, Decis. Support Syst..

[24]  H. Coates,et al.  A Critical Examination Of The Effects Of Learning Management Systems On University Teaching And Learning , 2005 .

[25]  Daniel J. Brass,et al.  Changing patterns or patterns of change: the effects of a change in technology on social network str , 1990 .

[26]  Laura Servage.  Strategizing for workplace e‐learning: some critical considerations , 2005 .

[27]  Donn Ritchie,et al.  What factors facilitate teacher skill, teacher morale, and perceived student learning in technology-using classrooms? , 2002, Comput. Educ..

[28]  Yi-Shun Wang,et al.  The adoption of electronic tax filing systems: an empirical study , 2003, Gov. Inf. Q..

[29]  Agatha M. Conrad,et al.  Relationships between Computer Self-Efficacy, Technology, Attitudes and Anxiety: Development of the Computer Technology Use Scale (CTUS) , 2008 .

[30]  Girish H. Subramanian,et al.  The Phases of ERP Software Implementation and Maintenance: A Model for Predicting Preferred ERP Use , 2008, J. Comput. Inf. Syst..

[31]  Greg W. Marshall,et al.  Sales force use of technology: antecedents to technology acceptance , 2005 .

[32]  Chris Higgins,et al.  Charismatic leadership and user acceptance of information technology , 2007, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[33]  B. Tabachnick,et al.  Using Multivariate Statistics , 1983 .

[34]  Dragan Gasevic,et al.  An Ontology-Based Framework for Bridging Learning Design and Learning Content , 2006, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[35]  Lih-Ching Chen Wang,et al.  Understanding the Dimensions of Self-Exploration in Web-Based Learning Environments , 2002 .

[36]  Icek Ajzen,et al.  From Intentions to Actions: A Theory of Planned Behavior , 1985 .

[37]  Thavamalar Govindasamy,et al.  Successful implementation of e-Learning: Pedagogical considerations , 2001, Internet High. Educ..

[38]  Eduardo Salas,et al.  E-Learning in Organizations , 2005 .

[39]  J. Arbaugh,et al.  Technological and Structural Characteristics, Student Learning and Satisfaction with Web-Based Courses , 2002 .

[40]  Dennis Beck,et al.  The other side of the LMS: Considering implementation and use in the adoption of an LMS in online and blended learning environments , 2007 .

[41]  Hassan M. Selim,et al.  Critical success factors for e-learning acceptance: Confirmatory factor models , 2007, Comput. Educ..

[42]  Per E. Pedersen,et al.  Adoption of Mobile Internet Services: An Exploratory Study of Mobile Commerce Early Adopters , 2005, J. Organ. Comput. Electron. Commer..

[43]  E. Rogers,et al.  Diffusion of innovations , 1964, Encyclopedia of Sport Management.

[44]  D. Jonassen.  Evaluating constructivistic learning , 1991 .

[45]  Hsiu-Mei Huang,et al.  Toward constructivism for adult learners in online learning environments , 2002, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[46]  Ephraim R. McLean,et al.  Information Systems Success: The Quest for the Dependent Variable , 1992, Inf. Syst. Res..

[47]  R. Karasek,et al.  Current issues relating to psychosocial job strain and cardiovascular disease research. , 1998, Journal of occupational health psychology.

[48]  Duncan David Nulty,et al.  How to use (five) curriculum design principles to align authentic learning environments, assessment, students’ approaches to thinking and learning outcomes , 2009 .

[49]  Deborah Compeau,et al.  Computer Self-Efficacy: Development of a Measure and Initial Test , 1995, MIS Q..

[50]  Charlie C. Chen,et al.  An Integrative Model to Predict the Continuance Use of Electronic Learning Systems: Hints for Teaching , 2006 .

[51]  Jane M. Howell,et al.  Personal Computing: Toward a Conceptual Model of Utilization , 1991, MIS Q..

[52]  P. Costa,et al.  The five-factor theory of personality. , 2008 .

[53]  B. Fraser,et al.  Development and Validation of an Instrument for Assessing Distance Education Learning Environments in Higher Education: The Distance Education Learning Environments Survey (DELES) , 2005 .

[54]  M. Conner,et al.  Extending the Theory of Planned Behavior: A Review and Avenues for Further Research , 1998 .

[55]  Mun Y. Yi,et al.  Predicting the use of web-based information systems: self-efficacy, enjoyment, learning goal orientation, and the technology acceptance model , 2003, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[56]  Rachel A. Vannatta,et al.  Teacher Dispositions as Predictors of Classroom Technology Use , 2004 .

[57]  Barbara H Wixom,et al.  A Theoretical Integration of User Satisfaction and Technology Acceptance , 2005, Inf. Syst. Res..

[58]  Angeliki Poulymenakou,et al.  Developing a Usability Evaluation Method for e-Learning Applications: Beyond Functional Usability , 2009, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[59]  A. Vishwanath.  Impact of personality on technology adoption: An empirical model , 2005, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[60]  Sarah Guri-rosenblit.  Eight paradoxes in the implementation process of e-learning in higher education 1 , 2006 .

[61]  A. Büssing,et al.  Can Control at Work and Social Support Moderate Psychological Consequences of Job Insecurity? Results from a Quasi-experimental Study in the Steel Industry , 1999 .

[62]  I. Brown.  Individual and Technological Factors Affecting Perceived Ease of Use of Web‐based Learning Technologies in a Developing Country , 2002, Electron. J. Inf. Syst. Dev. Ctries..

[63]  Marc Siegall,et al.  The Effects of Technological Self-Efficacy and Job Focus on Job Performance, Attitudes, and Withdrawal Behaviors , 1992 .

[64]  John Ingham,et al.  Why do people use information technology? A critical review of the technology acceptance model , 2003, Inf. Manag..

[65]  K. Unsworth,et al.  Understanding innovation adoption : effects of orientation , pressure and control on adoption , 2012 .

[66]  J. Sinacore.  Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions , 1993 .

[67]  E. Deci,et al.  Nature and autonomy: An organizational view of social and neurobiological aspects of self-regulation in behavior and development , 1997, Development and Psychopathology.

[68]  A. Bandura.  Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control , 1997, Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy.

[69]  S. Gosling,et al.  A very brief measure of the Big-Five personality domains , 2003 .

[70]  V. A. Thurmond,et al.  Evaluation of Student Satisfaction: Determining the Impact of a Web-Based Environment by Controlling for Student Characteristics , 2002 .

[71]  L. G. Tornatzky,et al.  Innovation characteristics and innovation adoption-implementation: A meta-analysis of findings , 1982, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[72]  S. Ghoshal,et al.  Social Capital and Value Creation: The Role of Intrafirm Networks , 1998 .

[73]  Angelene Carol Mclaren,et al.  The Effects of Instructor-Learner Interactions on Learner Satisfaction in Online Masters Courses. , 2010 .

[74]  Ephraim R. McLean,et al.  The DeLone and McLean Model of Information Systems Success: A Ten-Year Update , 2003, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[75]  O. John.  The "Big Five" factor taxonomy: Dimensions of personality in the natural language and in questionnaires. , 1990 .

[76]  M. Bond,et al.  Pancultural explanations for life satisfaction: adding relationship harmony to self-esteem. , 1997 .

[77]  R. Oliver.  A Cognitive Model of the Antecedents and Consequences of Satisfaction Decisions , 1980 .

[78]  J. Raubenheimer.  AN ITEM SELECTION PROCEDURE TO MAXIMISE SCALE RELIABILITY AND VALIDITY , 2004 .

[79]  Debra L. Nelson,et al.  Individual Adjustment to Information-Driven Technologies: A Critical Review , 1990, MIS Q..