The effects of contrast on perceived depth and depth discrimination

The contrast dependence of perceived depth was quantified through a series of depth matching experiments. Perceived depth was found to be a power law function of contrast. In addition, subjects exhibited a large uncrossed depth bias indicating that low contrast test patterns appeared much farther away than high contrast patterns of equal disparity. For disparities in the range of +/- 4.0 arc min, matching disparities for low contrast patterns were shifted in the uncrossed direction by the same amount. In other words, while the magnitude of the uncrossed depth bias is a power law function of contrast, it is constant with respect to disparity. In a second series of experiments, the contrast dependence of stereo increment thresholds was measured. Like perceived depth and stereoacuity, stereo increment thresholds were found to be a power law function of contrast. These results suggest that contrast effects occur at or before the extraction of depth and have implications for the response properties of disparity-selective mechanisms.

[1]  S. McKee,et al.  The imprecision of stereopsis , 1990, Vision Research.

[2]  I. Ohzawa,et al.  On the neurophysiological organization of binocular vision , 1990, Vision Research.

[3]  J. Mayhew,et al.  The Relationship between Apparent Depth and Disparity in Rivalrous-Texture Stereograms , 1978, Perception.

[4]  Clifton M. Schor,et al.  Is edge information for stereoacuity spatially channeled? , 1989, Vision Research.

[5]  Quick Rf.  A vector-magnitude model of contrast detection. , 1974 .

[6]  L. Cormack,et al.  Interocular correlation, luminance contrast and cyclopean processing , 1991, Vision Research.

[7]  Tomaso Poggio,et al.  Cooperative computation of stereo disparity , 1988 .

[8]  W. Richards,et al.  Anomalous stereoscopic depth perception. , 1971, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[9]  K. N. Ogle.  Precision and validity of stereoscopic depth perception from double images. , 1953, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[10]  D. Ferster.  A comparison of binocular depth mechanisms in areas 17 and 18 of the cat visual cortex , 1981, The Journal of physiology.

[11]  P A Howarth,et al.  Suprathreshold Stereo-Depth Matches as a Function of Contrast and Spatial Frequency , 1986, Perception.

[12]  W. Weibull.  A Statistical Distribution Function of Wide Applicability , 1951 .

[13]  Michael S. Landy,et al.  A Statistical Framework for Robust Fusion of Depth Information , 1989, Other Conferences.

[14]  S. Blackburn,et al.  Contrast as a depth cue , 1994, Vision Research.

[15]  Hugh R. Wilson,et al.  Contrast matching data predicted from contrast increment thresholds , 1984, Vision Research.

[16]  Gordon E. Legge,et al.  Stereopsis and contrast , 1989, Vision Research.

[17]  W Richards,et al.  Effects of luminance and contrast on processing large disparities. , 1974, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[18]  H. Wilson,et al.  Spatial frequency tuning of orientation selective units estimated by oblique masking , 1983, Vision Research.

[19]  D Marr,et al.  Cooperative computation of stereo disparity. , 1976, Science.

[20]  G A FRY,et al.  The effects of atmospheric scattering on binocular depth perception. , 1949, American journal of optometry and archives of American Academy of Optometry.

[21]  A Lit,et al.  Effect of target-background luminance contrast on binocular depth discrimination at photopic levels of illumination. , 1972, Vision Research.

[22]  C. Blakemore.  The range and scope of binocular depth discrimination in man , 1970, The Journal of physiology.

[23]  B. Julesz,et al.  Binocular disparity modulation sensitivity to disparities offset from the plane of fixation , 1984, Vision Research.

[24]  C. Schor,et al.  Disparity range for local stereopsis as a function of luminance spatial frequency , 1983, Vision Research.

[25]  Christopher W. Tyler,et al.  Binocular fusion limits are independent of contrast, luminance gradient and component phases , 1989, Vision Research.

[26]  G. Poggio,et al.  Stereoscopic mechanisms in monkey visual cortex: binocular correlation and disparity selectivity , 1988, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[27]  Victor Klymenko,et al.  Spatial frequency differences can determine figure-ground organization. , 1986, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[28]  A. M. Rohaly,et al.  Nature of coarse-to-fine constraints on binocular fusion. , 1993, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[29]  Clifton Schor,et al.  Interocular differences in contrast and spatial frequency: Effects on stereopsis and fusion , 1989, Vision Research.

[30]  James M. Brown,et al.  A spatial frequency effect on perceived depth , 1988, Perception & psychophysics.

[31]  D. Badcock,et al.  Depth-increment detection function for individual spatial channels. , 1985, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[32]  Gordon E. Legge,et al.  The binocular computation of visual direction , 1996, Vision Research.

[33]  R. Blake,et al.  How Contrast Affects Stereoacuity , 1988, Perception.

[34]  G. Poggio,et al.  Binocular interaction and depth sensitivity in striate and prestriate cortex of behaving rhesus monkey. , 1977, Journal of neurophysiology.