Cooperative societies in three- dimensional space: On the origins of aggregations, flocks, and schools, with special reference to dolphins and fish

Abstract In three-dimensional open space habits, and to a lesser degree open terrestrial habitats, cooperative groupings of animals have repeatedly evolved. These cooperative systems have been observed in a wide variety of animal taxa, ranging from sea urchins to cetaceans. Various attempts have been made to relate the origins of such patterns to kin or altruism theory. An evolutionary stable strategy appears to be involved. We propose a graded series of group structures of increasing complexity by means of which three-dimensional groupings could have evolved without recourse to either group selection or even necessarily kin selection or reciprocal altruism. These structures are asocial and social aggregations , and polarized schools . Social aggregations and polarized schools allow cooperative feeding and avoidance of predation. They confer three predation-related advantages over living alone for animals in open environments: (1) the dilution effect of large prey numbers relative to those of predators, (2) the encounter effect, which provides some protection from searching predators, and (3) the confusion effect by means of which visual tracking by a predator is confounded. We suggest that the gaze stabilization system of the visual system is involved in the most advanced version of the confusion effect. In polarized schools members sense and react to each other, forming a sensory integration system (SIS). This system allows detection and transmission of information across a school, flock, or herd in three dimensions. Because members watch beyond their immediate neighbors the transmission of such group reactions can greatly exceed the reaction speed of individual members, or any predator. Because the confusion effect and the SIS depend upon uniformity of behavior the polarized school is uncommonly difficult and perhaps impossible to cheat against. We perceive this as a key factor in the establishment of the evolutionarily stable strategy of schooling. Polarized schools and aggregations are considered as the extremes of a behavioral continuum. Because in daytime the polarized school is a safer place to be and because the aggregation allows more freedom of movement for such activities as food finding, groups in open space oscillate between the these extremes during varying levels of predation. The social complexity of fish schools seems modest whereas dolphin schools show the complexities of fairly typical mammalian organization. Occupancy of open space by both oceanic dolphins and schooling fish seems to have fostered promiscuous mating. In both open water fish and mammals elements of a cooperative disposition occur, which involves both cooperation and suppression of some aspects of individuality. Such dispositional elements allow the automatic support of a cooperative society. Dolphin schools, which during daytime rest or danger react like fish schools, express typical mammalian organization at other times. Dolphin echolocation has probably allowed the expression of mammalian behavior patterns at sea because it confers a major advantage over shark predators. The expression of mammalian social complexity may have required both kin and reciprocal altruistic patterns in different species.

[1]  D. Au,et al.  SEABIRD INTERACTIONS WITH DOLPHINS AND TUNA IN THE EASTERN TROPICAL PACIFIC , 1986 .

[2]  J. Avise,et al.  EVALUATING KINSHIP OF NEWLY SETTLED JUVENILES WITHIN SOCIAL GROUPS OF THE CORAL REEF FISH ANTHIAS SQUAMIPINNIS , 1986, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[3]  James A. Caviness,et al.  Persistent Fear Responses in Rhesus Monkeys to the Optical Stimulus of "Looming" , 1962, Science.

[4]  D. Whitacre,et al.  Raptor Predation on Wintering Shorebirds , 1975 .

[5]  G. Fleischer Hearing in extinct cetaceans as determined by cochlear structure , 1976 .

[6]  G. Bartholomew,et al.  The Fishing Activities of Double-Crested Cormorants on San Francisco Bay , 1942 .

[7]  G. Ellis Observations on the shoaling behaviour of cod (Gadus callarias) in deep water relative to daylight , 1956, Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom.

[8]  M. Fuller,et al.  Magnetic material in the head of the common Pacific dolphin. , 1981, Science.

[9]  R. Estes The Comparative Behavior of Grants and Thomson's Gazelles , 1967 .

[10]  H. W. Leibowitz,et al.  The effect of convergence on the vestibulo-ocular reflex and implications for perceived movement , 1982, Vision Research.

[11]  R. I. Clutter The microdistribution and social behavior of some pelagic mysid shrimps , 1969 .

[12]  C. Kuo,et al.  A preliminary report on the development, growth and survival of laboratory reared larvae of the grey mullet, Mugil cephalus L. , 1973 .

[13]  H. Leibowitz,et al.  A revised analysis of the role of efference in motion perception. , 1985, Perception.

[14]  K. S. Norris,et al.  Behavior of the Hawaiian Spinner Dolphin 'Stenella longirostris' (Schlegel, 1841). , 1979 .

[15]  M. Milinski Can an experienced predator overcome the confusion of swarming prey more easily? , 1979, Animal Behaviour.

[16]  C. Schaik Why Are Diurnal Primates Living in Groups , 1983 .

[17]  John R. Krebs,et al.  Predation and group living , 1987 .

[18]  D. K. Caldwell,et al.  Observations on the behavior of wild and captive false killer whales, with notes on associated behavior of other genera of captive delphinids , 1966, Contributions in science.

[19]  S. Vogel Life in Moving Fluids: The Physical Biology of Flow , 1981 .

[20]  E. Shaw The Development of Schooling Behavior in Fishes , 1960, Physiological Zoology.

[21]  K. Lagory The influence of habitat and group characteristics on the alarm and flight response of white-tailed deer , 1987, Animal Behaviour.

[22]  P. F. Major,et al.  Predator-prey interactions in two schooling fishes, Caranx ignobilis and Stolephorus purpureus , 1978, Animal Behaviour.

[23]  C. Breder On the survival value of fish schools , 1967, Zoologica : scientific contributions of the New York Zoological Society..

[24]  Stephen C. Trombulak,et al.  Size and Function of Mammalian Testes in Relation to Body Size , 1986 .

[25]  John Tyler Bonner The evolution of culture in animals , 1958 .

[26]  E. Hobson Predatory behavior of some shore fishes in the Gulf of California , 1968 .

[27]  E. Black Blood Levels of Hemoglobin and Lactic Acid in some Freshwater Fishes Following Exercise , 1955 .

[28]  L. Brower,et al.  Mortality of the Monarch Butterfly (Danaus plexippus L.): Avian Predation at Five Overwintering Sites in Mexico , 1979, Science.

[29]  W. Schiff PERCEPTION OF IMPENDING COLLISION: A STUDY OF VISUALLY DIRECTED AVOIDANT BEHAVIOR. , 1965, Psychological monographs.

[30]  C. K. Tayler,et al.  Diurnal Activity Cycles in Captive and Free-Ranging Indian Ocean Bottlenose Dolphins (Tursiops Ad Uncus Ehrenburg) , 1973 .

[31]  M. Keenleyside,et al.  Some Aspects of the Schooling Behaviour of Fish , 1955 .

[32]  W. Au,et al.  Receiving beam patterns and directivity indices of the Atlantic bottlenose dolphin Tursiops truncatus. , 1984, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[33]  J. Hailman Optical Signals: Animal Communication and Light , 1977 .

[34]  G. Turner,et al.  Attack Abatement: A Model for Group Protection by Combined Avoidance and Dilution , 1986, The American Naturalist.

[35]  John A. Wiens,et al.  The Ecology of Seabird Feeding Flocks in Alaska , 1981 .

[36]  Kenneth S. Norris,et al.  Are Dolphins Reciprocal Altruists? , 1982, The American Naturalist.

[37]  George V. N. Powell,et al.  Experimental analysis of the social value of flocking by starlings (Sturnus vulgaris) in relation to predation and foraging , 1974 .

[38]  R M Peterman,et al.  Wind Speed and Mortality Rate of a Marine Fish, the Northern Anchovy (Engraulis mordax) , 1987, Science.

[39]  K. S. Norris,et al.  Observations of Captive and Wild Cetaceans , 1956 .

[40]  R. Sperry Neural basis of the spontaneous optokinetic response produced by visual inversion. , 1950, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.

[41]  J. Dichgans,et al.  Visual-Vestibular Interaction: Effects on Self-Motion Perception and Postural Control , 1978 .

[42]  L. Underhill,et al.  Flocking as an anti-predator strategy in doves , 1975, Animal Behaviour.

[43]  J. Altmann,et al.  Baboon Ecology: African Field Research , 1970 .

[44]  W. Potts The chorus-line hypothesis of manoeuvre coordination in avian flocks , 1984, Nature.

[45]  P. F. Brodie,et al.  Cetacean Energetics, an Overview of Intraspecific Size Variation , 1975 .

[46]  R. Wrangham An Ecological Model of Female-Bonded Primate Groups , 1980 .

[47]  R J Schusterman Low false-alarm rates in signal detection by marine mammals. , 1974, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[48]  W. Foster,et al.  Evidence for the dilution effect in the selfish herd from fish predation on a marine insect , 1981, Nature.

[49]  R. D. Alexander,et al.  The evolution of social behavior , 1974 .

[50]  L. C. Katz,et al.  Structure and mechanisms of schooling intadpoles of the clawed frog, Xenopus laevis , 1981, Animal Behaviour.

[51]  B. Julesz A brief outline of the texton theory of human vision , 1984, Trends in Neurosciences.

[52]  G. Potts The predatory tactics of Caranx melampygus and the response of its prey , 1983 .

[53]  P. Arnold Predation on Harbour Porpoise, Phocoena phocoena, by a White Shark, Carcharodon carcharias , 1972 .

[54]  J. Blaxter,et al.  The Biology of the Clupeoid Fishes , 1982 .

[55]  Russell J. Schmitt,et al.  Cooperative Foraging by Yellowtail, Seriola lalandei (Carangidae), on Two Species of Fish Prey , 1982 .

[56]  J E MORROW,et al.  Schooling Behavior in Fishes , 1948, The Quarterly Review of Biology.

[57]  T. Pitcher,et al.  Evidence for position preferences in schooling mackerel , 1982, Animal Behaviour.

[58]  J. Michael Davis,et al.  The coordinated aerobatics of dunlin flocks , 1980, Animal Behaviour.

[59]  R. W. Gilmer,et al.  Behavior of Antarctic Krill, Euphausia superba: Chemoreception, Feeding, Schooling, and Molting , 1983, Science.

[60]  M. Riedman,et al.  The Evolution of Alloparental Care and Adoption in Mammals and Birds , 1982, The Quarterly Review of Biology.

[61]  W. H. D. V. Heel Sound and cetacea , 1962 .

[62]  J. Terborgh,et al.  Oddity and the ‘confusion effect’ in predation , 1986, Animal Behaviour.

[63]  R. Trivers The Evolution of Reciprocal Altruism , 1971, The Quarterly Review of Biology.

[64]  W. Hamilton Geometry for the selfish herd. , 1971, Journal of theoretical biology.

[65]  P. F. Major PREDATOR-PREY INTERACTIONS IN SCHOOLING FISHES DURING PERIODS OF TWILIGHT: A STUDY OF THE SILVERSIDE PRANESUS INSULARUM IN HAWAll 1 , 1977 .

[66]  A. Hurley,et al.  SCHOOL STRUCTURE OF THE SQUID LOLIGO OPALESCENS , 1978 .

[67]  B. Partridge Lateral Line Function and the Internal Dynamics of Fish Schools , 1981 .

[68]  L. M. Gómez-Laplaza,et al.  Towards an isolation syndrome for the angelfish, Pterophyllum scalare , 1986 .

[69]  H. Kruuk Clan-system and Feeding Habits of Spotted Hyaenas (Crocuta crocuta Erxleben) , 1966, Nature.

[70]  P. Richerson,et al.  Culture and the Evolutionary Process , 1988 .

[71]  J. Gibson The Senses Considered As Perceptual Systems , 1967 .

[72]  D. A. Humphries,et al.  Erratic Display as a Device against Predators , 1967, Science.

[73]  B L Partridge,et al.  The structure and function of fish schools. , 1982, Scientific American.

[74]  T. Pitcher,et al.  A blind fish can school. , 1976, Science.

[75]  W. Hamilton,et al.  The Evolution of Cooperation , 1984 .

[76]  R. Estes,et al.  Prey selection and hunting behavior of the African wild dog. , 1967 .

[77]  Robert H. Riffenburgh,et al.  Fish Schooling: A Possible Factor in Reducing Predation , 1960 .

[78]  D. Winkler,et al.  Flock-feeding on fish schools increases individual success in gulls , 1986, Nature.