Concurrent Optimization of Computationally Learned Stylistic Form and Functional Goals

Great design often results from intelligently balancing tradeoffs and leveraging of synergies between multiple product goals. While the engineering design community has numerous tools for managing the interface between functional goals in products, there are currently no formalized methods to concurrently optimize stylistic form and functional requirements. This research develops a method to coordinate seemingly disparate but highly related goals of stylistic form and functional constraints in computational design. An artificial neural network (ANN) based machine learning system was developed to model surveyed consumer judgments of stylistic form quantitatively. Coupling this quantitative model of stylistic form with a genetic algorithm (GA) enables computers to concurrently account for multiple objectives in the domains of stylistic form and more traditional functional performance evaluation within the same quantitative framework. This coupling then opens the door for computers to automatically generate products that not only work well but also convey desired styles to consumers. [DOI: 10.1115/1.4007304]

[1]  Peter G. Anderson,et al.  Neural network fitness functions for a musical IGA , 1996 .

[2]  J. Landry,et al.  Emotional Design: Why We Love (or Hate) Everyday Things (Book) , 2004 .

[3]  Glen Mullineux,et al.  Visually decomposing vehicle images: Exploring the influence of different aesthetic features on consumer perception of brand , 2012 .

[4]  G. Stiny Introduction to Shape and Shape Grammars , 1980 .

[5]  Shih-Wen Hsiao,et al.  A neural network based approach for product form design , 2002 .

[6]  P. Todd,et al.  Musical networks: Parallel distributed perception and performance , 1999 .

[7]  Ian H. Tseng The Unification of Stylistic Form and Function , 2011 .

[8]  P. Govers,et al.  Happy, cute and tough : Can designers create a product personality that consumers understand? , 2004 .

[9]  D. Norman Emotional design : why we love (or hate) everyday things , 2004 .

[10]  Kenneth Levenberg A METHOD FOR THE SOLUTION OF CERTAIN NON – LINEAR PROBLEMS IN LEAST SQUARES , 1944 .

[11]  D. E. Calkins,et al.  CDAERO : A PARAMETRIC AERODYNAMIC DRAG PREDICTION TOOL , 1998 .

[12]  Peter J. Fleming,et al.  An Overview of Evolutionary Algorithms in Multiobjective Optimization , 1995, Evolutionary Computation.

[13]  Kazutoshi Tsutsumi,et al.  Study on shape creation of building's roof by evaluating aesthetic sensibility , 2008, Math. Comput. Simul..

[14]  Sofiane Achiche,et al.  Mapping Shape Geometry and Emotions Using Fuzzy Logic , 2008 .

[15]  Shih-Wen Hsiao,et al.  A morphing method for shape generation and image prediction in product design , 2002 .

[16]  Jasbir S. Arora,et al.  Survey of multi-objective optimization methods for engineering , 2004 .

[17]  Jonathan Cagan,et al.  Form Function Fidelity , 2011 .

[18]  Thomas G. Dietterich What is machine learning? , 2020, Archives of Disease in Childhood.

[19]  Sung-Bae Cho,et al.  Application of interactive genetic algorithm to fashion design , 2000 .

[20]  Hideyuki Takagi,et al.  Interactive evolutionary computation: fusion of the capabilities of EC optimization and human evaluation , 2001, Proc. IEEE.

[21]  George A. Hazelrigg,et al.  A Framework for Decision-Based Engineering Design , 1998 .

[22]  Jonathan Cagan,et al.  Understanding of Emotions and Reasoning During Consumer Tradeoff Between Function and Aesthetics in Product Design , 2011 .

[23]  Jonathan Cagan,et al.  Capturing a rebel: modeling the Harley-Davidson brand through a motorcycle shape grammar , 2002 .

[24]  Kunihiko Fukushima,et al.  Neocognitron for handwritten digit recognition , 2003, Neurocomputing.

[25]  R. Marler,et al.  The weighted sum method for multi-objective optimization: new insights , 2010 .

[26]  Jonathan Cagan,et al.  A Blend of Different Tastes: The Language of Coffeemakers , 1998 .

[27]  Shumeet Baluja,et al.  Towards Automated Artificial Evolution for Computer-generated Images , 1993, Connect. Sci..

[28]  Eric F. Wood,et al.  Multiobjective Decision Analysis With Engineering and Business Applications , 1983 .

[29]  Lotfi A. Zadeh,et al.  Optimality and non-scalar-valued performance criteria , 1963 .

[30]  H. Li,et al.  Product Design Selection Under Uncertainty and With Competitive Advantage , 2000 .

[31]  Mitsuo Nagamachi,et al.  Kansei engineering as a powerful consumer-oriented technology for product development. , 2002, Applied ergonomics.

[32]  Bernard Yannou,et al.  Evolutive Design of Car Silhouettes , 2008, DAC 2008.

[33]  C. Osgood,et al.  The Measurement of Meaning , 1958 .

[34]  Hideyoshi Yanagisawa,et al.  Development of Interactive Industrial Design Support System Considering Customer's Evaluation , 2004 .

[35]  D. Marquardt An Algorithm for Least-Squares Estimation of Nonlinear Parameters , 1963 .

[36]  William K. Smith Multiobjective decision analysis with engineering and business applications , 1983 .

[37]  Simon French,et al.  Multi-Objective Decision Analysis with Engineering and Business Applications , 1983 .

[38]  Larry Bull,et al.  On Model-Based Evolutionary Computation , 1999, Soft Comput..

[39]  Jeremy J. Michalek,et al.  Balancing Marketing and Manufacturing Objectives in Product Line Design , 2006 .

[40]  T. Kobayashi,et al.  Aesthetic design system of structures using neural network and image database , 1995, Proceedings of 3rd International Symposium on Uncertainty Modeling and Analysis and Annual Conference of the North American Fuzzy Information Processing Society.

[41]  Wei Chen,et al.  Enhancing Discrete Choice Demand Modeling for Decision-Based Design , 2003 .

[42]  Thomas Vetter,et al.  Navigating in a Shape Space of Registered Models , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[43]  Dokshin Lim,et al.  Development of a KANSEI ENGINEERING SYSTEM for Industrial design : Identification of input data for KES , 2003 .

[44]  Jonathan Cagan,et al.  Automatically Generating Form Concepts According to Consumer Preference: A Shape Grammar Implementation With Software Agents , 2008, DAC 2008.

[45]  Carlos A. Coello Coello,et al.  An updated survey of GA-based multiobjective optimization techniques , 2000, CSUR.

[46]  Lothar Thiele,et al.  Multiobjective evolutionary algorithms: a comparative case study and the strength Pareto approach , 1999, IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput..

[47]  Gülen Çağdaş,et al.  A Shape Grammar: The Language of Traditional Turkish Houses , 1996 .

[48]  Panos Y. Papalambros,et al.  A Methodology for Quantifying the Perceived Environmental Friendliness of Vehicle Silhouettes in Engineering Design , 2009 .

[49]  Jonathan Cagan,et al.  Multiagent Shape Grammar Implementation: Automatically Generating Form Concepts According to a Preference Function , 2009 .

[50]  Kunihiko Fukushima,et al.  Neocognitron: A hierarchical neural network capable of visual pattern recognition , 1988, Neural Networks.