Cognitive Hierarchy in Capacity Allocation Games

We examine a supply chain with a single supplier and multiple retailers to predict retailers’ actual ordering behaviors. If retailer orders exceed supplier capacity, a proportional rationing rule applies to capacity allocation among retailers. We propose a behavior model based on cognitive hierarchy theory, in which retailers with different levels of strategic-reasoning capabilities form heterogeneous beliefs about other players’ capabilities when choosing their orders. This behavioral model yields three interesting predictions. First, retailers’ orders increase as the number of retailers decreases or the supplier’s production capacity shrinks. Second, the orders tend to increase as the retailer population becomes more “sophisticated”. Third, retailers’ profits first increase in relation to their strategic-reasoning capabilities and then decrease, indicating an inverted U-shaped relationship between profits and strategic-reasoning capabilities. We experimentally examine the capacity allocation game with participants motivated by financial incentives. The experimental results and structural model estimation confirm the predictions of the behavioral model.

[1]  Gérard P. Cachon,et al.  Game Theory in Supply Chain Analysis , 2004 .

[2]  Teck-Hua Ho,et al.  Distributional and Peer-Induced Fairness in Supply Chain Contract Design , 2013, Production and Operations Management.

[3]  Colin Camerer,et al.  A Cognitive Hierarchy Model of Games , 2004 .

[4]  S. D. Wu,et al.  Incentive Schemes for Semiconductor Capacity Allocation: A Game Theoretic Analysis , 2005 .

[5]  Elena Katok,et al.  Should Sellers Prefer Auctions? A Laboratory Comparison of Auctions and Sequential Mechanisms , 2014, Manag. Sci..

[6]  Özalp Özer,et al.  Trust in Forecast Information Sharing , 2009, Manag. Sci..

[7]  Tony Haitao Cui,et al.  Fairness Ideals in Distribution Channels , 2016 .

[8]  Fangruo Chen,et al.  Managing Downstream Competition via Capacity Allocation , 2013 .

[9]  Thomas R. Palfrey,et al.  Heterogeneous quantal response equilibrium and cognitive hierarchies , 2006, J. Econ. Theory.

[10]  Rachel Croson,et al.  Why and how to experiment: Methodologies from experimental economics , 2002 .

[11]  Alexander L. Brown,et al.  Estimating Structural Models of Equilibrium and Cognitive Hierarchy Thinking in the Field: The Case of Withheld Movie Critic Reviews , 2012, Manag. Sci..

[12]  Nigel Harvey,et al.  Confidence in judgment , 1997, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[13]  Gérard P. Cachon,et al.  Capacity Allocation Using Past Sales: When to Turn-And-Earn , 1999 .

[14]  Ulrich Wilhelm Thonemann,et al.  Designing Buyback Contracts for Irrational but Predictable Newsvendors , 2011, Manag. Sci..

[15]  Xuanming Su,et al.  On the Value of Commitment and Availability Guarantees when Selling to Strategic Consumers , 2008, Manag. Sci..

[16]  Syngjoo Choi A cognitive hierarchy model of learning in networks , 2012 .

[17]  Zhixin Liu,et al.  Equilibrium analysis of capacity allocation with demand competition , 2012 .

[18]  Avi Goldfarb,et al.  Are All Managers Created Equal? , 2008 .

[19]  Özalp Özer,et al.  Trust, Trustworthiness, and Information Sharing in Supply Chains Bridging China and the U.S. , 2014, Manag. Sci..

[20]  John Morgan,et al.  When Do Markets Tip? A Cognitive Hierarchy Approach , 2013, Mark. Sci..

[21]  Lauren Xiaoyuan Lu,et al.  Capacity Allocation Over a Long Horizon: The Return on Turn-and-Earn , 2012, Manuf. Serv. Oper. Manag..

[22]  Xuanming Su,et al.  Modeling Bounded Rationality in Capacity Allocation Games with the Quantal Response Equilibrium , 2011, Manag. Sci..

[23]  Gérard P. Cachon,et al.  An equilibrium analysis of linear, proportional and uniform allocation of scarce capacity , 1999 .

[24]  R. Nagel Unraveling in Guessing Games: An Experimental Study , 1995 .

[25]  Avi Goldfarb,et al.  Who Thinks about the Competition? Managerial Ability and Strategic Entry in US Local Telephone Markets , 2008 .

[26]  Miguel A. Costa-Gomes,et al.  Cognition and Behavior in Two-Person Guessing Games: An Experimental Study , 2003 .

[27]  Tony Haitao Cui,et al.  Fairness and Channel Coordination , 2007, Manag. Sci..

[28]  Anton Ovchinnikov,et al.  How to Compete Against a Behavioral Newsvendor , 2015 .

[29]  Daniel Carvalho,et al.  A cognitive hierarchy model of behavior in the action commitment game , 2014, Int. J. Game Theory.

[30]  Yinghao Zhang,et al.  Contract Preferences and Performance for the Loss-Averse Supplier: Buyback versus Revenue Sharing , 2015, Manag. Sci..

[31]  R. McKelvey,et al.  Quantal Response Equilibria for Normal Form Games , 1995 .

[32]  Tianjun Feng,et al.  Modeling Strategic Behavior in the Competitive Newsvendor Problem: An Experimental Investigation , 2017 .

[33]  U. Fischbacher z-Tree: Zurich toolbox for ready-made economic experiments , 1999 .

[34]  R. Duncan Luce,et al.  Individual Choice Behavior: A Theoretical Analysis , 1979 .

[35]  Yuxin Chen,et al.  The Benefit of Uniform Price for Branded Variants , 2012, Mark. Sci..

[36]  Xuanming Su,et al.  A Dynamic Level-k Model in Sequential Games , 2012, Manag. Sci..

[37]  Gérard P. Cachon,et al.  Capacity Choice and Allocation: Strategic Behavior and Supply Chain Performance , 1999 .

[38]  Colin Camerer,et al.  Experience‐weighted Attraction Learning in Normal Form Games , 1999 .

[39]  Soo-Haeng Cho,et al.  Technical Note - Capacity Allocation Under Retail Competition: Uniform and Competitive Allocations , 2014, Oper. Res..

[40]  R. Pohl Cognitive illusions : a handbook on fallacies and biases in thinking, judgement and memory , 2004 .