Kinship, reciprocity and synergism in the evolution of social behaviour

There are two ways to model the genetic evolution of social behaviour. Population genetic models using personal fitness1 –9 may be exact and of wide applicability, but they are often complex and assume very different forms for different kinds of social behaviour. The alternative, inclusive fitness models10 –12, achieves simplicity and clarity by attributing all fitness effects of a behaviour to an expanded fitness of the actor. For example, Hamilton's rule states that an altruistic behaviour will be favoured when −c + rb>0, where c is the fitness cost to the altruist, b is the benefit to its partner, and r is their relatedness. But inclusive fitness results are often inexact for interactions between kin1–5, and they do not address phenomena such as reciprocity13–15 and synergistic effects7,8,16 that may either be confounded with kinship or operate in its absence. Here I develop a model the results of which may be expressed in terms of either personal or inclusive fitness, and which combines the advantages of both; it is general, exact, simple and empirically useful. Hamilton's rule is shown to hold for reciprocity as well as kin selection. It fails because of synergistic effects, but this failure can be corrected through the use of coefficients of synergism, which are analogous to the coefficient of relatedness.

[1]  D. Falconer,et al.  Introduction to Quantitative Genetics. , 1962 .

[2]  W. Hamilton The genetical evolution of social behaviour. I. , 1964, Journal of theoretical biology.

[3]  George R. Price,et al.  Selection and Covariance , 1970, Nature.

[4]  R. Trivers The Evolution of Reciprocal Altruism , 1971, The Quarterly Review of Biology.

[5]  S. Jayakar,et al.  Conditions for the evolution of altruism under Darwinian selection. , 1976, Theoretical population biology.

[6]  I. Eshel,et al.  On the founder effect and the evolution of altruistic traits. , 1976, Theoretical population biology.

[7]  M. Feldman,et al.  Darwinian selection and "altruism". , 1978, Theoretical population biology.

[8]  B. Charlesworth,et al.  Some models of the evolution of altruistic behaviour between siblings. , 1978, Journal of theoretical biology.

[9]  M. Orlove,et al.  Coefficients of relationship and coefficients of relatedness in kin selection: a covariance form for the RHO formula. , 1978, Journal of theoretical biology.

[10]  A. Templeton A Frequency Dependent Model of Brood Selection , 1979, The American Naturalist.

[11]  B. Bertram,et al.  Male lions in large coalitions gain reproductive advantages , 1979, Nature.

[12]  Models of the evolution of altruism , 1980 .

[13]  David Sloan Wilson,et al.  The Natural Selection Of Populations And Communities , 1981 .

[14]  Scott A. Boorman,et al.  The Genetics of Altruism , 1981 .

[15]  W. Hamilton,et al.  Coefficients of relatedness in sociobiology , 1980, Nature.

[16]  J. Seger,et al.  Kinship and covariance. , 1981, Journal of theoretical biology.

[17]  Richard E. Michod,et al.  The Theory of Kin Selection , 1982 .

[18]  J. Bull,et al.  The Evolution of Aposematic Coloration in Distasteful Prey: A Family Model , 1982, The American Naturalist.

[19]  M. Feldman,et al.  Population Genetic Theory of Kin Selection. II. The Multiplicative Model , 1982, The American Naturalist.

[20]  Michael J. Sanderson,et al.  Evolution of Social Behavior by Reciprocation , 1982 .

[21]  D. Queller,et al.  Kin selection and frequency dependence: a game theoretic approach , 1984 .

[22]  I. Bernstein Current problems in sociobiology Edited by Kings College Sociobiology Group. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1982, 394 pp. Hardback: £27.50, ISBN 0-521-24203-7. Paperback: £9.95, ISBN 0-521-28250-8 , 1984, Behavioural Processes.

[23]  W. Hamilton,et al.  The Evolution of Cooperation , 1984 .

[24]  M. Wade Soft Selection, Hard Selection, Kin Selection, and Group Selection , 1985, The American Naturalist.