The Simbios National Center: Systems Biology in Motion

Physics-based simulation is needed to understand the function of biological structures and can be applied across a wide range of scales, from molecules to organisms. Simbios (the national center for physics-based simulation of biological structures, http://www.simbios.stanford.edu/</weblink>) is one of seven NIH-supported national centers for biomedical computation. This article provides an overview of the mission and achievements of Simbios, and describes its place within systems biology. Understanding the interactions between various parts of a biological system and integrating this information to understand how biological systems function is the goal of systems biology. Many important biological systems comprise complex structural systems whose components interact through the exchange of physical forces, and whose movement and function is dictated by those forces. In particular, systems that are made of multiple identifiable components that move relative to one another in a constrained manner are multibody systems. Simbios' focus is creating methods for their simulation. Simbios is also investigating the biomechanical forces that govern fluid flow through deformable vessels, a central problem in cardiovascular dynamics. In this application, the system is governed by the interplay of classical forces, but the motion is distributed smoothly through the materials and fluids, requiring the use of continuum methods. In addition to the research aims, Simbios is working to disseminate information, software and other resources relevant to biological systems in motion.

[1]  R. Stephenson A and V , 1962, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[2]  M. Karplus,et al.  CHARMM: A program for macromolecular energy, minimization, and dynamics calculations , 1983 .

[3]  F.E. Zajac,et al.  An interactive graphics-based model of the lower extremity to study orthopaedic surgical procedures , 1990, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[4]  T. Cech Self-splicing of group I introns. , 1990, Annual review of biochemistry.

[5]  M Puso,et al.  NIKE3D a nonlinear, implicit, three-dimensional finite element code for solid and structural mechanics user's manual update summary , 1991 .

[6]  Whirley DYNA3D: A nonlinear, explicit, three-dimensional finite element code for solid and structural mechanics , 1993 .

[7]  F E Zajac,et al.  Muscle coordination of movement: a perspective. , 1993, Journal of biomechanics.

[8]  Abhinandan Jain,et al.  A fast recursive algorithm for molecular dynamics simulation , 1993 .

[9]  D. van der Spoel,et al.  GROMACS: A message-passing parallel molecular dynamics implementation , 1995 .

[10]  S L Delp,et al.  A graphics-based software system to develop and analyze models of musculoskeletal structures. , 1995, Computers in biology and medicine.

[11]  C. Kundrot,et al.  Crystal Structure of a Group I Ribozyme Domain: Principles of RNA Packing , 1996, Science.

[12]  Abhinandan Jain,et al.  Constant temperature constrained molecular dynamics: The Newton-Euler inverse mass operator method , 1996 .

[13]  A. Hindmarsh,et al.  CVODE, a stiff/nonstiff ODE solver in C , 1996 .

[14]  B. Tidor Molecular dynamics simulations , 1997, Current Biology.

[15]  J. Ponder,et al.  Calculation of the reaction field due to off-center point multipoles , 1997 .

[16]  T. Cech,et al.  A preorganized active site in the crystal structure of the Tetrahymena ribozyme. , 1998, Science.

[17]  C. Keasar,et al.  Empirical modifications to the Amber/OPLS potential for predicting the solution conformations of cyclic peptides by vacuum calculations. , 1998, Folding & design.

[18]  Jay W. Ponder,et al.  Analysis and Application of Potential Energy Smoothing and Search Methods for Global Optimization , 1998 .

[19]  C. Cramer,et al.  Implicit Solvation Models: Equilibria, Structure, Spectra, and Dynamics. , 1999, Chemical reviews.

[20]  Oussama Khatib,et al.  Efficient algorithm for extended operational space inertia matrix , 1999, Proceedings 1999 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. Human and Environment Friendly Robots with High Intelligence and Emotional Quotients (Cat. No.99CH36289).

[21]  D. E. Clark Rapid calculation of polar molecular surface area and its application to the prediction of transport phenomena. 1. Prediction of intestinal absorption. , 1999, Journal of pharmaceutical sciences.

[22]  Vijay S. Pande,et al.  Screen Savers of the World Unite! , 2000, Science.

[23]  T. Steitz,et al.  The complete atomic structure of the large ribosomal subunit at 2.4 A resolution. , 2000, Science.

[24]  C. Vonrhein,et al.  Structure of the 30S ribosomal subunit , 2000, Nature.

[25]  A. Houdusse,et al.  Three conformational states of scallop myosin S1. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[26]  D. Herschlag,et al.  Probing the folding landscape of the Tetrahymena ribozyme: commitment to form the native conformation is late in the folding pathway. , 2001, Journal of molecular biology.

[27]  C D Schwieters,et al.  Internal coordinates for molecular dynamics and minimization in structure determination and refinement. , 2001, Journal of magnetic resonance.

[28]  M. Tomita Whole-cell simulation: a grand challenge of the 21st century. , 2001, Trends in biotechnology.

[29]  M. Pandy,et al.  Dynamic optimization of human walking. , 2001, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[30]  T. Earnest,et al.  Crystal Structure of the Ribosome at 5.5 Å Resolution , 2001, Science.

[31]  Berk Hess,et al.  GROMACS 3.0: a package for molecular simulation and trajectory analysis , 2001 .

[32]  J. Irwin,et al.  Lead discovery using molecular docking. , 2002, Current opinion in chemical biology.

[33]  J. Berg,et al.  Molecular dynamics simulations of biomolecules , 2002, Nature Structural Biology.

[34]  V. Pande,et al.  Absolute comparison of simulated and experimental protein-folding dynamics , 2002, Nature.

[35]  Scott L Delp,et al.  Generating dynamic simulations of movement using computed muscle control. , 2003, Journal of biomechanics.

[36]  L. Wood,et al.  From the Authors , 2003, European Respiratory Journal.

[37]  Pengyu Y. Ren,et al.  Polarizable Atomic Multipole Water Model for Molecular Mechanics Simulation , 2003 .

[38]  윤창노,et al.  Molecular Dynamics Simulations for Biomolecules , 2004 .

[39]  Charles Taylor,et al.  EXPERIMENTAL AND COMPUTATIONAL METHODS IN CARDIOVASCULAR FLUID MECHANICS , 2004 .

[40]  D. Thirumalai,et al.  RNA and protein folding: common themes and variations. , 2005, Biochemistry.

[41]  R. Breaker,et al.  Riboswitches as versatile gene control elements. , 2005, Current opinion in structural biology.

[42]  R. Altman,et al.  SAFA: semi-automated footprinting analysis software for high-throughput quantification of nucleic acid footprinting experiments. , 2005, RNA.

[43]  Mike P. Liang,et al.  Local kinetic measures of macromolecular structure reveal partitioning among multiple parallel pathways from the earliest steps in the folding of a large RNA molecule. , 2006, Journal of molecular biology.

[44]  Eric Darve,et al.  N-Body simulation on GPUs , 2006, SC.

[45]  Pengyu Y. Ren,et al.  Generalized coarse-grained model based on point multipole and Gay-Berne potentials. , 2006, The Journal of chemical physics.

[46]  Ayman Habib,et al.  OpenSim: Open-Source Software to Create and Analyze Dynamic Simulations of Movement , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[47]  A. Lew,et al.  A microstructurally informed model for the mechanical response of three-dimensional actin networks , 2008, Computer methods in biomechanics and biomedical engineering.