Learning by teaching with virtual peers and the effects of technological design choices on learning

Advancements in technology have brought about new forms of learning and online instruction that allow communication through virtual representations without physically meeting in person. This study builds on previous work involving recursive feedback that tests the hypothesis that an important facet of learning-by-teaching is the opportunity to watch one's pupil perform. Sixty graduate students examined the value of recursive feedback that occurred when tutors observed their pupil subsequently apply what they had been taught. The study took place in the virtual environment Second Life where adults tutored another adult about human biology through their virtual representations. The tutors who observed their pupil avatar interact with an examiner exhibited superior learning relative to several control conditions that included learning-by-teaching elements but not recursive feedback. The second study examined the effect of popular design choices on recursive feedback during learning-by-teaching (e.g., customization, look-alike features). The customization condition involved tutoring a pupil avatar that the participant customized prior to the study and observing the pupil avatar answer questions. The doppelganger look-alike condition involved tutoring a pupil avatar that looked like the participant and observing the pupil avatar answer questions. Results showed that conscious awareness of look-alike features and the extent to which one customizes the pupil avatar influences learning.

[1]  D. Schoen,et al.  The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action , 1985 .

[2]  D. Nicol,et al.  Formative assessment and self‐regulated learning: a model and seven principles of good feedback practice , 2006 .

[3]  A. Bandura.  Social Cognitive Theory of Mass Communication , 2001 .

[4]  Hans Christian Arnseth,et al.  Approaching institutional contexts: systemic versus dialogic research in CSCL , 2006, Int. J. Comput. Support. Collab. Learn..

[5]  M. Chi,et al.  Eliciting Self‐Explanations Improves Understanding , 1994 .

[6]  J. Bailenson,et al.  The Use of Immersive Virtual Reality in the Learning Sciences: Digital Transformations of Teachers, Students, and Social Context , 2008 .

[7]  M. Lepper,et al.  Rethinking the value of choice: a cultural perspective on intrinsic motivation. , 1999, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[8]  J. Bailenson,et al.  The Effect of Interactivity on Learning Physical Actions in Virtual Reality , 2008 .

[9]  R. Ploetzner,et al.  Learning by explaining to oneself and to others. , 1999 .

[10]  John D. Bransford,et al.  Online Learning Based on Essential Concepts and Formative Assessment , 2012 .

[11]  J. Garbarino.  The Impact of Anticipated Reward upon Cross-Age Tutoring , 1975 .

[12]  Todd Bowerly,et al.  A Virtual Reality Scenario for All Seasons: The Virtual Classroom , 2009, CNS Spectrums.

[13]  K. Rittschof,et al.  Reciprocal Peer Tutoring: Re-examining the value of a co-operative learning technique to college students and instructors , 2001 .

[14]  M. Lerner,et al.  The consequences of perceived similarity: Attraction and rejection, approach and avoidance. , 1972 .

[15]  Daniel L. Schwartz,et al.  The Mere Belief of Social Interaction Improves Learning , 2007 .

[16]  S. Narciss.  Feedback Strategies for Interactive Learning Tasks , 2007 .

[17]  Suzanne K. Damarin,et al.  The second self: Computers and the human spirit , 1985 .

[18]  Gautam Biswas,et al.  Technology support for complex problem solving: from SAD environments to AI , 2001 .

[19]  Judson C King,et al.  Restructuring Engineering Education: Why, How And When? , 2011 .

[20]  Michelene T. H. Chi,et al.  Eliciting Self-Explanations Improves Understanding , 1994, Cogn. Sci..

[21]  Paul D. Bolls,et al.  How Avatar Customizability Affects Children's Arousal and Subjective Presence During Junk Food-Sponsored Online Video Games , 2009, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[22]  Robert F. Morgan,et al.  Learning by Teaching: A Student-to-Student Compensatory Tutoring Program in a Rural School System and its Relevance to the Educational Cooperative , 1970 .

[23]  Rosa María Baños,et al.  Using augmented reality to treat phobias , 2005, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications.

[24]  A. Kluger,et al.  Feedback Interventions , 1998 .

[25]  Donald MacKenzie,et al.  The social shaping of technology : how the refrigerator got its hum , 1985 .

[26]  E. Deci,et al.  Quality of Learning With an Active Versus Passive Motivational Set , 1984 .

[27]  J. Michael Spector,et al.  Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology, 3rd Edition , 2012 .

[28]  John R. Chambers,et al.  Biases in social comparative judgments: the role of nonmotivated factors in above-average and comparative-optimism effects. , 2004, Psychological bulletin.

[29]  E. Mory.  Feedback research revisited. , 2004 .

[30]  Albert A. Rizzo,et al.  VR PTSD Exposure Therapy Results with Active Duty OIF/OEF Combatants , 2009, MMVR.

[31]  Jeremy N. Bailenson,et al.  Effects of facial similarity on user responses to embodied agents , 2010, TCHI.

[32]  G. Riva,et al.  Virtual reality based experiential cognitive treatment of anorexia nervosa. , 1999, Journal of behavior therapy and experimental psychiatry.

[33]  U. Staudinger,et al.  Interactive minds : life-span perspectives on the social foundation of cognition , 1996 .

[34]  Richard Lowe,et al.  Learning with Animation: Research Implications for Design , 2007 .

[35]  L. DeBruine.  Facial resemblance enhances trust , 2002, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[36]  Ronald E. Riggio,et al.  Effects of Reciprocal Peer Tutoring on Academic Achievement and Psychological Adjustment: A Component Analysis. , 1989 .

[37]  Grigore C. Burdea,et al.  Treating Psychological and Physical Disorders with VR , 2022 .

[38]  M. Azmitia,et al.  Peer interactive minds: Developmental, theoretical, and methodological issues , 1996 .

[39]  P. Kirschner,et al.  Social and Cognitive Factors Driving Teamwork in Collaborative Learning Environments , 2006 .

[40]  N. Webb.  Peer interaction and learning in small groups , 1989 .

[41]  R. J. Bogumil,et al.  The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action , 1985, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[42]  K. Blair.  Pedagogical agents for learning by teaching: Teachable agents , 2007 .

[43]  Robert Hanna.  What is the self? , 2011, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[44]  Yaacov Schul,et al.  On the Cognitive Benefits of Teaching , 1980 .

[45]  M. Lepper,et al.  Intrinsic motivation and the process of learning: Beneficial effects of contextualization, personalization, and choice. , 1996 .

[46]  R. Siegler,et al.  How Does Change Occur: A Microgenetic Study of Number Conservation , 1995, Cognitive Psychology.

[47]  Sasha A. Barab,et al.  Design-Based Research: A Methodological Toolkit for the Learning Scientist. , 2006 .

[48]  Brad A. Dufrene,et al.  Monitoring Implementation of Reciprocal Peer Tutoring: Identifying and Intervening With Students Who Do Not Maintain Accurate Implementation , 2005 .

[49]  Larry Ambrose,et al.  The power of feedback. , 2002, Healthcare executive.

[50]  S. Fiske,et al.  The Handbook of Social Psychology , 1935 .

[51]  Rod D. Roscoe,et al.  Understanding Tutor Learning: Knowledge-Building and Knowledge-Telling in Peer Tutors’ Explanations and Questions , 2007 .

[52]  R. Glaser.  Advances in Instructional Psychology , 1978 .

[53]  Selen Turkay,et al.  Free to be me: a survey study on customization with World of Warcraft and City Of Heroes/Villains players , 2010 .

[54]  Julie L. Andsager,et al.  Perceived Similarity of Exemplar Traits and Behavior Effects on Message Evaluation , 2005 .

[55]  Albert Bandura,et al.  Role of Symbolic Coding and Rehearsal Processes in Observational Learning. , 1973 .

[56]  Daniel L. Schwartz,et al.  Teachable Agents and the Protégé Effect: Increasing the Effort Towards Learning , 2009 .

[57]  Ann L. Brown,et al.  Reciprocal Teaching of Comprehension-Fostering and Comprehension-Monitoring Activities , 1984 .

[58]  R. Siegler.  Microgenetic Studies of Self-Explanation , 2002 .

[59]  Jorge Adolfo Ramírez Uresti,et al.  Should I Teach My Computer Peer? Some Issues in Teaching a Learning Companion , 2000, Intelligent Tutoring Systems.

[60]  Miriam Gamoran Sherin,et al.  When Teaching Becomes Learning , 2002 .

[61]  Jiska Cohen,et al.  Theoretical considerations of peer tutoring , 1986 .

[62]  Roger Säljö.  Learning and technologies, people and tools in co-ordinated activities , 2004 .

[63]  Sandra Y. Okita,et al.  When Observation Beats Doing: Learning by Teaching , 2006, ICLS.

[64]  D. Dunning.  A newer look: Motivated social cognition and the schematic representation of social concepts. , 1999 .

[65]  A. Bandura,et al.  Identification as a process of incidental learning. , 1961, Journal of abnormal and social psychology.

[66]  Kathryn Y. Segovia,et al.  Virtually True: Children's Acquisition of False Memories in Virtual Reality , 2009 .

[67]  R. Moreno,et al.  Students' choice of animated pedagogical agents in science learning: A test of the similarity-attraction hypothesis on gender and ethnicity , 2006 .

[68]  Jennifer A. Mangels,et al.  Why do beliefs about intelligence influence learning success? A social cognitive neuroscience model. , 2006, Social cognitive and affective neuroscience.

[69]  Jeremy N. Bailenson,et al.  Facial Similarity Between Voters and Candidates Causes Influence , 2008 .

[70]  R. Zajonc.  SOCIAL FACILITATION. , 1965, Science.

[71]  Edward L. Deci,et al.  The Empirical Exploration of Intrinsic Motivational Processes1 , 1980 .

[72]  Xiaohui Liu,et al.  Editorial: Data mining for understanding user needs , 2010, TCHI.

[73]  Takashi Yamauchi,et al.  Learning from human tutoring , 2001, Cogn. Sci..

[74]  Charles R. Greenwood,et al.  The use of peer tutoring strategies in classroom management and educational instruction. , 1988 .

[75]  Charles K. Crook,et al.  Deferring to resources: collaborations around traditional vs computer-based notes , 2002, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[76]  Alexander Renkl,et al.  Learning for later teaching: An exploration of mediational links between teaching expectancy and learning results. , 1995 .

[77]  J. Bailenson,et al.  Virtual Self-Modeling: The Effects of Vicarious Reinforcement and Identification on Exercise Behaviors , 2009 .

[78]  Nicholas Epley,et al.  Mirror, Mirror on the Wall: Enhancement in Self-Recognition , 2008, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[79]  Rod D. Roscoe,et al.  Tutor learning: the role of explaining and responding to questions , 2008 .

[80]  Sun Joo Grace Ahn,et al.  Self-Endorsing Versus Other-Endorsing in Virtual Environments , 2011 .

[81]  A. Kluger,et al.  The effects of feedback interventions on performance: A historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. , 1996 .

[82]  F. Hesse,et al.  ijCSCL—a journal for research in CSCL , 2006 .

[83]  N. J. Slamecka,et al.  The Generation Effect: Delineation of a Phenomenon , 1978 .

[84]  Clifford Nass,et al.  The media equation - how people treat computers, television, and new media like real people and places , 1996 .

[85]  J. Bailenson,et al.  The Proteus Effect: The Effect of Transformed Self-Representation on Behavior , 2007 .

[86]  Carolyn Penstein Rosé,et al.  Tutorial Dialogue as Adaptive Collaborative Learning Support , 2007, AIED.

[87]  Charalambos Vrasidas,et al.  Distance Education and Distributed Learning. Current Perspectives on Applied Information Technologies. , 2002 .

[88]  Miguel A. Vadillo,et al.  Illusion of Control , 2013, Experimental psychology.

[89]  Catherine A. Brown,et al.  Learning to Teach Hard Mathematics: Do Novice Teachers and Their Instructors Give Up Too Easily? , 1992 .

[90]  Url PubMed.  Retrieval Practice Produces More Learning than Elaborative Studying with Concept Mapping , 2012 .

[91]  Justine Cassell,et al.  Literacy learning by storytelling with a virtual peer , 2002, CSCL.

[92]  Jeremy N. Bailenson,et al.  Virtual Experiences, Physical Behaviors: The Effect of Presence on Imitation of an Eating Avatar , 2009, PRESENCE: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments.

[93]  Mel Slater,et al.  The impact of avatar realism and eye gaze control on perceived quality of communication in a shared immersive virtual environment , 2003, CHI '03.