An Empirical Approach to Workload and Human Capability Assessment in a Manufacturing Plant

The Human Factors contribution in the scope of the industrial process optimization presented in this case study had to deal with considerations regarding the physical and mental workload requirements of different workstations and the capabilities of the operators assigned to them. The scope was to provide the industrial management with a better way to allocate human resources to tasks requiring different operational skills. The model developed and customised showed promises results for the case study in which it was applied but offers also a generalizable feature that can extend to other contexts and situations. The assessment performed can contribute to consider necessary areas of improvement in terms of technical measures, procedure optimizations and improved work organization, to reduce defects and waste generation. The paper presents a brief description of the theoretical and empirical approach used to assess the workload of complex tasks in assembly lines and the matching operators’ skillsets; furthermore, it also discusses some of the preliminary results of its application.

[1]  Georg Rasch,et al.  Probabilistic Models for Some Intelligence and Attainment Tests , 1981, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[2]  S. Iliffe,et al.  Bmc Medical Research Methodology Open Access the Hawthorne Effect: a Randomised, Controlled Trial , 2007 .

[3]  Christopher D. Wickens,et al.  Mental Workload: Assessment, Prediction and Consequences , 2017, H-WORKLOAD.

[4]  D. Greenwood,et al.  Introduction to Action Research: Social Research for Social Change , 1998 .

[5]  W. Ziemba,et al.  Growth-optimal investments and numeraire portfolios under transactions costs , 2013 .

[6]  Gabriele Baldissone,et al.  Comparison of two methodologies for occupational accidents pre-cursors data collection , 2015 .

[7]  D B Chaffin,et al.  Shoulder disorders and postural stress in automobile assembly work. , 2000, Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health.

[8]  Tim Baines,et al.  Modelling human performance within manufacturing systems design: from a theoretical towards a practical framework , 2007 .

[9]  Luca Longo,et al.  Human Mental Workload: Models and Applications , 2017, Communications in Computer and Information Science.

[10]  Hyung-Shik Jung,et al.  Establishment of overall workload assessment technique for various tasks and workplaces , 2001 .

[11]  Colin G. Drury,et al.  Ergonomics and quality in paced assembly lines , 2001 .

[12]  Micaela Demichela,et al.  A combined approach for the analysis of large occupational accident databases to support accident-prevention decision making , 2018 .

[13]  J Eklund,et al.  Ergonomics, quality and continuous improvement--conceptual and empirical relationships in an industrial context. , 1997, Ergonomics.

[14]  H. Madadi Kojabadi,et al.  Simulation and experimental studies of model reference adaptive system for sensorless induction motor drive , 2005, Simul. Model. Pract. Theory.

[15]  Ali Mosleh,et al.  A data-informed PIF hierarchy for model-based Human Reliability Analysis , 2012, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[16]  Paul H.P. Yeow,et al.  Proving external validity of ergonomics and quality relationship through review of real-world case studies , 2011 .

[17]  Milos Milovanovic,et al.  Neuroergonomics Method for Measuring the Influence of Mental Workload Modulation on Cognitive State of Manual Assembly Worker , 2017, H-WORKLOAD.

[18]  Herbert Ugrinowitsch,et al.  Task engagement and mental workload involved in variation and repetition of a motor skill , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[19]  A. Kramer,et al.  Physiological metrics of mental workload: A review of recent progress , 1990, Multiple-task performance.

[20]  Pio G. Iovenitti,et al.  A sociotechnical approach to achieve zero defect manufacturing of complex manual assemblies , 2007 .

[21]  Sarah Fletcher,et al.  Towards a theoretical framework for human performance modelling within manufacturing systems design , 2005, Simul. Model. Pract. Theory.

[22]  A. Tversky,et al.  Prospect Theory : An Analysis of Decision under Risk Author ( s ) : , 2007 .

[23]  Angela Didomenico,et al.  Interactive effects of physical and mental workload on subjective workload assessment , 2008 .

[24]  Gabriele Baldissone,et al.  The analysis and management of unsafe acts and unsafe conditions. Data collection and analysis , 2019, Safety Science.

[25]  Neville A Stanton,et al.  Hierarchical task analysis: developments, applications, and extensions. , 2006, Applied ergonomics.

[26]  S. Miyake.  Multivariate workload evaluation combining physiological and subjective measures. , 2001, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[27]  Maria Chiara Leva,et al.  The Benefits of Task and Cognitive Workload Support for Operators in Ground Handling , 2017, H-WORKLOAD.

[28]  D. Greenwood,et al.  Introduction to Action Research , 2007 .

[29]  Christopher D. Wickens,et al.  Multiple Resources and Mental Workload , 2008, Hum. Factors.

[30]  Miloš Milovanović,et al.  Communicating the user state: Introducing cognition-aware computing in industrial settings , 2019, Safety Science.

[31]  Ann-Christine Falck,et al.  Assembly failures and action cost in relation to complexity level and assembly ergonomics in manual assembly (part 2) , 2014 .