The outbreak of cooperation among success-driven individuals under noisy conditions

According to Thomas Hobbes' Leviathan [1651; 2008 (Touchstone, New York), English Ed], “the life of man [is] solitary, poor, nasty, brutish, and short,” and it would need powerful social institutions to establish social order. In reality, however, social cooperation can also arise spontaneously, based on local interactions rather than centralized control. The self-organization of cooperative behavior is particularly puzzling for social dilemmas related to sharing natural resources or creating common goods. Such situations are often described by the prisoner's dilemma. Here, we report the sudden outbreak of predominant cooperation in a noisy world dominated by selfishness and defection, when individuals imitate superior strategies and show success-driven migration. In our model, individuals are unrelated, and do not inherit behavioral traits. They defect or cooperate selfishly when the opportunity arises, and they do not know how often they will interact or have interacted with someone else. Moreover, our individuals have no reputation mechanism to form friendship networks, nor do they have the option of voluntary interaction or costly punishment. Therefore, the outbreak of prevailing cooperation, when directed motion is integrated in a game-theoretical model, is remarkable, particularly when random strategy mutations and random relocations challenge the formation and survival of cooperative clusters. Our results suggest that mobility is significant for the evolution of social order, and essential for its stabilization and maintenance.

[1]  Joshua M. Epstein,et al.  Zones of cooperation in demographic prisoner's dilemma , 1997, Complex..

[2]  E. Rowland Theory of Games and Economic Behavior , 1946, Nature.

[3]  H. Peyton Young,et al.  Individual Strategy and Social Structure , 2020 .

[4]  Ulf Dieckmann,et al.  Adaptive Evolution of Social Traits: Origin, Trajectories, and Correlations of Altruism and Mobility , 2004, The American Naturalist.

[5]  Thomas C. Schelling,et al.  Dynamic models of segregation , 1971 .

[6]  Bettina Rockenbach,et al.  The efficient interaction of indirect reciprocity and costly punishment , 2006, Nature.

[7]  Michael Doebeli,et al.  Spatial structure often inhibits the evolution of cooperation in the snowdrift game , 2004, Nature.

[8]  C Athena Aktipis,et al.  Know when to walk away: contingent movement and the evolution of cooperation. , 2004, Journal of theoretical biology.

[9]  O. Leimar,et al.  The evolution of cooperation in mobile organisms , 1993, Animal Behaviour.

[10]  György Szabó,et al.  Phase transitions and volunteering in spatial public goods games. , 2002, Physical review letters.

[11]  M. Milinski,et al.  Reputation helps solve the ‘tragedy of the commons’ , 2002, Nature.

[12]  J. J. Arenzon,et al.  Does mobility decrease cooperation? , 2006, Journal of theoretical biology.

[13]  G. Hardin,et al.  The Tragedy of the Commons , 1968, Green Planet Blues.

[14]  M. Nowak Five Rules for the Evolution of Cooperation , 2006, Science.

[15]  J. Deneubourg,et al.  Dynamics of Aggregation and Emergence of Cooperation , 2002, The Biological Bulletin.

[16]  B. Huberman,et al.  The outbreak of cooperation , 1993 .

[17]  E. Fehr,et al.  Altruistic punishment in humans , 2002, Nature.

[18]  L. Dugatkin,et al.  Rover: A Strategy for Exploiting Cooperators in a Patchy Environment , 1991, The American Naturalist.

[19]  Wenjian Yu,et al.  Migration as a Mechanism to Promote Cooperation , 2008, Adv. Complex Syst..

[20]  T. Reichenbach,et al.  Mobility promotes and jeopardizes biodiversity in rock–paper–scissors games , 2007, Nature.

[21]  W. Hamilton,et al.  The Evolution of Cooperation , 1984 .

[22]  M. Nowak,et al.  Evolutionary games and spatial chaos , 1992, Nature.

[23]  G. Haag Book review: Sociodynamics–A systematic approach to mathematical modelling in the social sciences, by Wolfgang Weidlich , 2000 .

[24]  Albert-László Barabási,et al.  Understanding individual human mobility patterns , 2008, Nature.

[25]  M H Vainstein,et al.  Disordered environments in spatial games. , 2001, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[26]  M. Nowak,et al.  Evolution of cooperation by multilevel selection. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[27]  C. Hauert Fundamental clusters in spatial 2×2 games , 2001, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[28]  R. Boyd,et al.  The evolution of altruistic punishment , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[29]  A. Faludi,et al.  Cities and complexity: , 2021, Cities in the Anthropocene.

[30]  M. Nowak,et al.  Evolution of indirect reciprocity by image scoring , 1998, Nature.

[31]  Denise Pumain,et al.  Spatial analysis and population dynamics , 1991 .

[32]  B. Skyrms Evolution of the social contract , 1996 .

[33]  Andreas Flache,et al.  Do Irregular Grids make a Difference? Relaxing the Spatial Regularity Assumption in Cellular Models of Social Dynamics , 2001, J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul..

[34]  T. Geisel,et al.  The scaling laws of human travel , 2006, Nature.

[35]  Wolfgang Weidlich,et al.  Sociodynamics: a Systematic Approach to Mathematical Modelling in the Social Sciences , 2000 .