Prescribing Cartesian Stiffness of Soft Robots by Co-Optimization of Shape and Segment-Level Stiffness.

Soft robots aim to revolutionize how robotic systems interact with the environment thanks to their inherent compliance. Some of these systems are even able to modulate their physical softness. However, simply equipping a robot with softness will not generate intelligent behaviors. Indeed, most interaction tasks require careful specification of the compliance at the interaction point; some directions must be soft and others firm (e.g., while drawing, entering a hole, tracing a surface, assembling components). On the contrary, without careful planning, the preferential directions of deformation of a soft robot are not aligned with the task. With this work, we propose a strategy to prescribe variations of the physical stiffness and the robot's posture so to implement a desired Cartesian stiffness and location of the contact point. We validate the algorithm in simulation and with experiments. To perform the latter, we also present a new tendon-driven soft manipulator, equipped with variable-stiffness segments and proprioceptive sensing and capable to move in three dimensional. We show that, combining the intelligent hardware with the proposed algorithm, we can obtain the desired stiffness at the end-effector over the workspace.

[1]  Tingting Su,et al.  Coordinated variable impedance control for multi-segment cable-driven continuum manipulators , 2020 .

[2]  Kyu-Jin Cho,et al.  Tendon-Driven Jamming Mechanism for Configurable Variable Stiffness. , 2020, Soft robotics.

[3]  Marc D. Killpack,et al.  Comparing model-based control methods for simultaneous stiffness and position control of inflatable soft robots , 2020, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[4]  Andrew L. Orekhov,et al.  Directional Stiffness Modulation of Parallel Robots With Kinematic Redundancy and Variable Stiffness Joints , 2019, Journal of Mechanisms and Robotics.

[5]  Lydia E. Kavraki,et al.  Exploring implicit spaces for constrained sampling-based planning , 2019, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[6]  Joseph M. Schimmels,et al.  Passive Compliance Control of Redundant Serial Manipulators , 2018, Journal of Mechanisms and Robotics.

[7]  A Menciassi,et al.  A bioinspired soft manipulator for minimally invasive surgery , 2015, Bioinspiration & biomimetics.

[8]  K. Iagnemma,et al.  Thermally Tunable, Self-Healing Composites for Soft Robotic Applications , 2014 .

[9]  Carmel Majidi,et al.  Soft-matter composites with electrically tunable elastic rigidity , 2013 .

[10]  Cecilia Laschi,et al.  Soft robotics: a bioinspired evolution in robotics. , 2013, Trends in biotechnology.

[11]  Oliver M. O’Reilly,et al.  On Cartesian stiffness matrices in rigid body dynamics: an energetic perspective , 2010 .

[12]  Robert J. Webster,et al.  Design and Kinematic Modeling of Constant Curvature Continuum Robots: A Review , 2010, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[13]  Ian D. Walker,et al.  Kinematics and the Implementation of an Elephant's Trunk Manipulator and Other Continuum Style Robots , 2003, J. Field Robotics.

[14]  Neville Hogan,et al.  Impedance Control: An Approach to Manipulation: Part II—Implementation , 1985 .

[15]  Ingo Müller,et al.  Rubber and rubber balloons , 2004 .